Cargando…
Primary central nervous system lymphoma: advances in MRI and PET imaging
Contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) remains the imaging modality of choice for initial workup, staging, and response assessment after therapy in patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL). While CE-MRI is a sensitive test to detect blood brain barrier (BBB) dysfu...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9387672/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35994050 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/aol-20-53 |
Sumario: | Contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) remains the imaging modality of choice for initial workup, staging, and response assessment after therapy in patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL). While CE-MRI is a sensitive test to detect blood brain barrier (BBB) dysfunction, it does not biologically represent the true tumor burden. Current response assessment criteria relies heavily on two dimensional anatomical measurements on post contrast T1-weighted (T1W) images, as well as pre-contrast T2-weighted (T2W) imaging. Additional MRI features, such as diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and perfusion weighted imaging, can be routinely obtained at most centers with MRI capabilities. Emerging evidence supports the incorporation of these data to better define tumor physiology and provide additional valuable clinical tools capable of identifying high risk subgroups as well as early predictors of response to therapies. Further, novel advanced molecular and pathophysiologic characterization of PCNSL provides insights into promising targeted therapeutic approaches. However, significant institutional imaging variation and inconsistent clinical trial reporting diminishes the reliability, reproducibility and eventual translation in day to day management of patients with PCNSL. Here we review established neuroimaging concepts and provide an overview of published literature about novel imaging techniques that may improve diagnosis and response assessments. Finally, we highlight the need for standardization of image acquisition, post-processing, and incorporation of novel imaging biomarkers in early phase PCNSL clinical trials. |
---|