Cargando…
Parents’ views on accepting, declining, and expanding newborn bloodspot screening
INTRODUCTION: The goal of newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) is the early detection of treatable disorders in newborns to offer early intervention. Worldwide, the number of conditions screened for is expanding, which might affect public acceptance. In the Netherlands, participation is high (>99%),...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9387838/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35980961 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272585 |
_version_ | 1784770090845077504 |
---|---|
author | van der Pal, Sylvia M. Wins, Sophie Klapwijk, Jasmijn E. van Dijk, Tessa Kater-Kuipers, Adriana van der Ploeg, Catharina P. B. Jans, Suze M. P. J. Kemp, Stephan Verschoof-Puite, Rendelien K. van den Bosch, Lion J. M. Henneman, Lidewij |
author_facet | van der Pal, Sylvia M. Wins, Sophie Klapwijk, Jasmijn E. van Dijk, Tessa Kater-Kuipers, Adriana van der Ploeg, Catharina P. B. Jans, Suze M. P. J. Kemp, Stephan Verschoof-Puite, Rendelien K. van den Bosch, Lion J. M. Henneman, Lidewij |
author_sort | van der Pal, Sylvia M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The goal of newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) is the early detection of treatable disorders in newborns to offer early intervention. Worldwide, the number of conditions screened for is expanding, which might affect public acceptance. In the Netherlands, participation is high (>99%), but little is known about how parents perceive NBS. This study assessed parents’ views on accepting, declining and expanding NBS. METHODS: A total of 804 of 6051 (13%) invited parents who participated in NBS in the Netherlands during the last two weeks of December 2019, and 48 of 1162 (4%) invited parents who declined participation in NBS in 2019 and 2020, completed a questionnaire. RESULTS: The most important reason for parents to participate in NBS was to prevent health complaints, whereas the most important reason to decline NBS was parents’ viewpoint on life and the belief that the heel prick would be painful for the child. Compared to NBS participants, respondents who declined NBS were more actively religious, considered alternative medicine or lifestyle more important, were less inclined to vaccinate their child for infectious diseases, and reported more doubt about NBS participation (all differences p < .001). Informed choice was lower among respondents who declined NBS (44%) compared to participants in NBS (83%, p < .001), mostly due to insufficient knowledge. Of the NBS participants, 95% were positive about NBS expansion. Most NBS participants agreed to include conditions that could unintentionally reveal a diagnosis in the mother instead of the child (86%) or a condition that may not cause symptoms until later in the child’s life (84%). CONCLUSION: Most participants made an informed decision to participate in NBS and are positive about screening for more conditions. Insights into parents’ views on (non-)participation and expansion of NBS can help to ensure that NBS suits the population needs while safeguarding ethical principles for screening. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9387838 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93878382022-08-19 Parents’ views on accepting, declining, and expanding newborn bloodspot screening van der Pal, Sylvia M. Wins, Sophie Klapwijk, Jasmijn E. van Dijk, Tessa Kater-Kuipers, Adriana van der Ploeg, Catharina P. B. Jans, Suze M. P. J. Kemp, Stephan Verschoof-Puite, Rendelien K. van den Bosch, Lion J. M. Henneman, Lidewij PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: The goal of newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) is the early detection of treatable disorders in newborns to offer early intervention. Worldwide, the number of conditions screened for is expanding, which might affect public acceptance. In the Netherlands, participation is high (>99%), but little is known about how parents perceive NBS. This study assessed parents’ views on accepting, declining and expanding NBS. METHODS: A total of 804 of 6051 (13%) invited parents who participated in NBS in the Netherlands during the last two weeks of December 2019, and 48 of 1162 (4%) invited parents who declined participation in NBS in 2019 and 2020, completed a questionnaire. RESULTS: The most important reason for parents to participate in NBS was to prevent health complaints, whereas the most important reason to decline NBS was parents’ viewpoint on life and the belief that the heel prick would be painful for the child. Compared to NBS participants, respondents who declined NBS were more actively religious, considered alternative medicine or lifestyle more important, were less inclined to vaccinate their child for infectious diseases, and reported more doubt about NBS participation (all differences p < .001). Informed choice was lower among respondents who declined NBS (44%) compared to participants in NBS (83%, p < .001), mostly due to insufficient knowledge. Of the NBS participants, 95% were positive about NBS expansion. Most NBS participants agreed to include conditions that could unintentionally reveal a diagnosis in the mother instead of the child (86%) or a condition that may not cause symptoms until later in the child’s life (84%). CONCLUSION: Most participants made an informed decision to participate in NBS and are positive about screening for more conditions. Insights into parents’ views on (non-)participation and expansion of NBS can help to ensure that NBS suits the population needs while safeguarding ethical principles for screening. Public Library of Science 2022-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9387838/ /pubmed/35980961 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272585 Text en © 2022 van der Pal et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article van der Pal, Sylvia M. Wins, Sophie Klapwijk, Jasmijn E. van Dijk, Tessa Kater-Kuipers, Adriana van der Ploeg, Catharina P. B. Jans, Suze M. P. J. Kemp, Stephan Verschoof-Puite, Rendelien K. van den Bosch, Lion J. M. Henneman, Lidewij Parents’ views on accepting, declining, and expanding newborn bloodspot screening |
title | Parents’ views on accepting, declining, and expanding newborn bloodspot screening |
title_full | Parents’ views on accepting, declining, and expanding newborn bloodspot screening |
title_fullStr | Parents’ views on accepting, declining, and expanding newborn bloodspot screening |
title_full_unstemmed | Parents’ views on accepting, declining, and expanding newborn bloodspot screening |
title_short | Parents’ views on accepting, declining, and expanding newborn bloodspot screening |
title_sort | parents’ views on accepting, declining, and expanding newborn bloodspot screening |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9387838/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35980961 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272585 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanderpalsylviam parentsviewsonacceptingdecliningandexpandingnewbornbloodspotscreening AT winssophie parentsviewsonacceptingdecliningandexpandingnewbornbloodspotscreening AT klapwijkjasmijne parentsviewsonacceptingdecliningandexpandingnewbornbloodspotscreening AT vandijktessa parentsviewsonacceptingdecliningandexpandingnewbornbloodspotscreening AT katerkuipersadriana parentsviewsonacceptingdecliningandexpandingnewbornbloodspotscreening AT vanderploegcatharinapb parentsviewsonacceptingdecliningandexpandingnewbornbloodspotscreening AT janssuzempj parentsviewsonacceptingdecliningandexpandingnewbornbloodspotscreening AT kempstephan parentsviewsonacceptingdecliningandexpandingnewbornbloodspotscreening AT verschoofpuiterendelienk parentsviewsonacceptingdecliningandexpandingnewbornbloodspotscreening AT vandenboschlionjm parentsviewsonacceptingdecliningandexpandingnewbornbloodspotscreening AT hennemanlidewij parentsviewsonacceptingdecliningandexpandingnewbornbloodspotscreening |