Cargando…

Insertions and deletions as phylogenetic signal in an alignment-free context

Most methods for phylogenetic tree reconstruction are based on sequence alignments; they infer phylogenies from substitutions that may have occurred at the aligned sequence positions. Gaps in alignments are usually not employed as phylogenetic signal. In this paper, we explore an alignment-free appr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Birth, Niklas, Dencker, Thomas, Morgenstern, Burkhard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9387925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35939516
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010303
_version_ 1784770109381804032
author Birth, Niklas
Dencker, Thomas
Morgenstern, Burkhard
author_facet Birth, Niklas
Dencker, Thomas
Morgenstern, Burkhard
author_sort Birth, Niklas
collection PubMed
description Most methods for phylogenetic tree reconstruction are based on sequence alignments; they infer phylogenies from substitutions that may have occurred at the aligned sequence positions. Gaps in alignments are usually not employed as phylogenetic signal. In this paper, we explore an alignment-free approach that uses insertions and deletions (indels) as an additional source of information for phylogeny inference. For a set of four or more input sequences, we generate so-called quartet blocks of four putative homologous segments each. For pairs of such quartet blocks involving the same four sequences, we compare the distances between the two blocks in these sequences, to obtain hints about indels that may have happened between the blocks since the respective four sequences have evolved from their last common ancestor. A prototype implementation that we call Gap-SpaM is presented to infer phylogenetic trees from these data, using a quartet-tree approach or, alternatively, under the maximum-parsimony paradigm. This approach should not be regarded as an alternative to established methods, but rather as a complementary source of phylogenetic information. Interestingly, however, our software is able to produce phylogenetic trees from putative indels alone that are comparable to trees obtained with existing alignment-free methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9387925
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93879252022-08-19 Insertions and deletions as phylogenetic signal in an alignment-free context Birth, Niklas Dencker, Thomas Morgenstern, Burkhard PLoS Comput Biol Research Article Most methods for phylogenetic tree reconstruction are based on sequence alignments; they infer phylogenies from substitutions that may have occurred at the aligned sequence positions. Gaps in alignments are usually not employed as phylogenetic signal. In this paper, we explore an alignment-free approach that uses insertions and deletions (indels) as an additional source of information for phylogeny inference. For a set of four or more input sequences, we generate so-called quartet blocks of four putative homologous segments each. For pairs of such quartet blocks involving the same four sequences, we compare the distances between the two blocks in these sequences, to obtain hints about indels that may have happened between the blocks since the respective four sequences have evolved from their last common ancestor. A prototype implementation that we call Gap-SpaM is presented to infer phylogenetic trees from these data, using a quartet-tree approach or, alternatively, under the maximum-parsimony paradigm. This approach should not be regarded as an alternative to established methods, but rather as a complementary source of phylogenetic information. Interestingly, however, our software is able to produce phylogenetic trees from putative indels alone that are comparable to trees obtained with existing alignment-free methods. Public Library of Science 2022-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9387925/ /pubmed/35939516 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010303 Text en © 2022 Birth et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Birth, Niklas
Dencker, Thomas
Morgenstern, Burkhard
Insertions and deletions as phylogenetic signal in an alignment-free context
title Insertions and deletions as phylogenetic signal in an alignment-free context
title_full Insertions and deletions as phylogenetic signal in an alignment-free context
title_fullStr Insertions and deletions as phylogenetic signal in an alignment-free context
title_full_unstemmed Insertions and deletions as phylogenetic signal in an alignment-free context
title_short Insertions and deletions as phylogenetic signal in an alignment-free context
title_sort insertions and deletions as phylogenetic signal in an alignment-free context
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9387925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35939516
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010303
work_keys_str_mv AT birthniklas insertionsanddeletionsasphylogeneticsignalinanalignmentfreecontext
AT denckerthomas insertionsanddeletionsasphylogeneticsignalinanalignmentfreecontext
AT morgensternburkhard insertionsanddeletionsasphylogeneticsignalinanalignmentfreecontext