Cargando…

Best cutoff score of cervical-pedicle thickness as a morphological parameter for predicting cervical central stenosis

There are various factors for the cause of cervical central stenosis (CCS), such as osteophyte, cervical-disc degeneration, and cervical ligamentum flavum hypertrophy. However, the pedicle of the cervical vertebra has not yet been analyzed for its relationship with CCS. We created a new morphologic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Choi, Jungho, Park, Hyung-Bok, Lim, Taeha, Yi, Shin Wook, Lee, Sooho, Park, Sukhee, Park, SoYoon, Yi, Jungmin, Kim, Young Uk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9388033/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35984177
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000030014
_version_ 1784770133597618176
author Choi, Jungho
Park, Hyung-Bok
Lim, Taeha
Yi, Shin Wook
Lee, Sooho
Park, Sukhee
Park, SoYoon
Yi, Jungmin
Kim, Young Uk
author_facet Choi, Jungho
Park, Hyung-Bok
Lim, Taeha
Yi, Shin Wook
Lee, Sooho
Park, Sukhee
Park, SoYoon
Yi, Jungmin
Kim, Young Uk
author_sort Choi, Jungho
collection PubMed
description There are various factors for the cause of cervical central stenosis (CCS), such as osteophyte, cervical-disc degeneration, and cervical ligamentum flavum hypertrophy. However, the pedicle of the cervical vertebra has not yet been analyzed for its relationship with CCS. We created a new morphologic parameter called the cervical-pedicle thickness (CPT) to assess the association between CCS and the cervical pedicle. We obtained morphological cases involving the CPT from 82 patients with CCS. There were also 84 in the normal group who underwent cervical spine magnetic resonance imaging (CS-MR) as part of routine health screening. We obtained the T2-weighted CS-MR axial images from group members, and assessed the CPT at the level of the C6 vertebra on CS-MR. The mean CPT was 3.46 ± 0.57 mm in the normal group, 4.97 ± 0.75 mm in the CCS group, which thus had a significantly higher CPT (P < .01) than did the normal group. For the prognostic value of the CPT as a predictor of CCS, ROC analysis indicated that the best cutoff score for the CPT was 4.18 mm, with 93.9% sensitivity, 92.9% specificity, and AUC 0.97. Greater CPT was highly associated with a possibility of CCS. This conclusion will be helpful for assessing the CCS patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9388033
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93880332022-08-23 Best cutoff score of cervical-pedicle thickness as a morphological parameter for predicting cervical central stenosis Choi, Jungho Park, Hyung-Bok Lim, Taeha Yi, Shin Wook Lee, Sooho Park, Sukhee Park, SoYoon Yi, Jungmin Kim, Young Uk Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article There are various factors for the cause of cervical central stenosis (CCS), such as osteophyte, cervical-disc degeneration, and cervical ligamentum flavum hypertrophy. However, the pedicle of the cervical vertebra has not yet been analyzed for its relationship with CCS. We created a new morphologic parameter called the cervical-pedicle thickness (CPT) to assess the association between CCS and the cervical pedicle. We obtained morphological cases involving the CPT from 82 patients with CCS. There were also 84 in the normal group who underwent cervical spine magnetic resonance imaging (CS-MR) as part of routine health screening. We obtained the T2-weighted CS-MR axial images from group members, and assessed the CPT at the level of the C6 vertebra on CS-MR. The mean CPT was 3.46 ± 0.57 mm in the normal group, 4.97 ± 0.75 mm in the CCS group, which thus had a significantly higher CPT (P < .01) than did the normal group. For the prognostic value of the CPT as a predictor of CCS, ROC analysis indicated that the best cutoff score for the CPT was 4.18 mm, with 93.9% sensitivity, 92.9% specificity, and AUC 0.97. Greater CPT was highly associated with a possibility of CCS. This conclusion will be helpful for assessing the CCS patients. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9388033/ /pubmed/35984177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000030014 Text en Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Research Article
Choi, Jungho
Park, Hyung-Bok
Lim, Taeha
Yi, Shin Wook
Lee, Sooho
Park, Sukhee
Park, SoYoon
Yi, Jungmin
Kim, Young Uk
Best cutoff score of cervical-pedicle thickness as a morphological parameter for predicting cervical central stenosis
title Best cutoff score of cervical-pedicle thickness as a morphological parameter for predicting cervical central stenosis
title_full Best cutoff score of cervical-pedicle thickness as a morphological parameter for predicting cervical central stenosis
title_fullStr Best cutoff score of cervical-pedicle thickness as a morphological parameter for predicting cervical central stenosis
title_full_unstemmed Best cutoff score of cervical-pedicle thickness as a morphological parameter for predicting cervical central stenosis
title_short Best cutoff score of cervical-pedicle thickness as a morphological parameter for predicting cervical central stenosis
title_sort best cutoff score of cervical-pedicle thickness as a morphological parameter for predicting cervical central stenosis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9388033/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35984177
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000030014
work_keys_str_mv AT choijungho bestcutoffscoreofcervicalpediclethicknessasamorphologicalparameterforpredictingcervicalcentralstenosis
AT parkhyungbok bestcutoffscoreofcervicalpediclethicknessasamorphologicalparameterforpredictingcervicalcentralstenosis
AT limtaeha bestcutoffscoreofcervicalpediclethicknessasamorphologicalparameterforpredictingcervicalcentralstenosis
AT yishinwook bestcutoffscoreofcervicalpediclethicknessasamorphologicalparameterforpredictingcervicalcentralstenosis
AT leesooho bestcutoffscoreofcervicalpediclethicknessasamorphologicalparameterforpredictingcervicalcentralstenosis
AT parksukhee bestcutoffscoreofcervicalpediclethicknessasamorphologicalparameterforpredictingcervicalcentralstenosis
AT parksoyoon bestcutoffscoreofcervicalpediclethicknessasamorphologicalparameterforpredictingcervicalcentralstenosis
AT yijungmin bestcutoffscoreofcervicalpediclethicknessasamorphologicalparameterforpredictingcervicalcentralstenosis
AT kimyounguk bestcutoffscoreofcervicalpediclethicknessasamorphologicalparameterforpredictingcervicalcentralstenosis