Cargando…

Scenarios for modeling solar radiation modification

Making informed future decisions about solar radiation modification (SRM; also known as solar geoengineering)—approaches such as stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI) that would cool the climate by reflecting sunlight—requires projections of the climate response and associated human and ecosystem im...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: MacMartin, D. G., Visioni, D., Kravitz, B., Richter, J.H., Felgenhauer, T., Lee, W. R., Morrow, D. R., Parson, E. A., Sugiyama, M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: National Academy of Sciences 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9388149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35939702
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2202230119
_version_ 1784770160812359680
author MacMartin, D. G.
Visioni, D.
Kravitz, B.
Richter, J.H.
Felgenhauer, T.
Lee, W. R.
Morrow, D. R.
Parson, E. A.
Sugiyama, M.
author_facet MacMartin, D. G.
Visioni, D.
Kravitz, B.
Richter, J.H.
Felgenhauer, T.
Lee, W. R.
Morrow, D. R.
Parson, E. A.
Sugiyama, M.
author_sort MacMartin, D. G.
collection PubMed
description Making informed future decisions about solar radiation modification (SRM; also known as solar geoengineering)—approaches such as stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI) that would cool the climate by reflecting sunlight—requires projections of the climate response and associated human and ecosystem impacts. These projections, in turn, will rely on simulations with global climate models. As with climate-change projections, these simulations need to adequately span a range of possible futures, describing different choices, such as start date and temperature target, as well as risks, such as termination or interruptions. SRM modeling simulations to date typically consider only a single scenario, often with some unrealistic or arbitrarily chosen elements (such as starting deployment in 2020), and have often been chosen based on scientific rather than policy-relevant considerations (e.g., choosing quite substantial cooling specifically to achieve a bigger response). This limits the ability to compare risks both between SRM and non-SRM scenarios and between different SRM scenarios. To address this gap, we begin by outlining some general considerations on scenario design for SRM. We then describe a specific set of scenarios to capture a range of possible policy choices and uncertainties and present corresponding SAI simulations intended for broad community use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9388149
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher National Academy of Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93881492022-08-19 Scenarios for modeling solar radiation modification MacMartin, D. G. Visioni, D. Kravitz, B. Richter, J.H. Felgenhauer, T. Lee, W. R. Morrow, D. R. Parson, E. A. Sugiyama, M. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Physical Sciences Making informed future decisions about solar radiation modification (SRM; also known as solar geoengineering)—approaches such as stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI) that would cool the climate by reflecting sunlight—requires projections of the climate response and associated human and ecosystem impacts. These projections, in turn, will rely on simulations with global climate models. As with climate-change projections, these simulations need to adequately span a range of possible futures, describing different choices, such as start date and temperature target, as well as risks, such as termination or interruptions. SRM modeling simulations to date typically consider only a single scenario, often with some unrealistic or arbitrarily chosen elements (such as starting deployment in 2020), and have often been chosen based on scientific rather than policy-relevant considerations (e.g., choosing quite substantial cooling specifically to achieve a bigger response). This limits the ability to compare risks both between SRM and non-SRM scenarios and between different SRM scenarios. To address this gap, we begin by outlining some general considerations on scenario design for SRM. We then describe a specific set of scenarios to capture a range of possible policy choices and uncertainties and present corresponding SAI simulations intended for broad community use. National Academy of Sciences 2022-08-08 2022-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9388149/ /pubmed/35939702 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2202230119 Text en Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by PNAS. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Physical Sciences
MacMartin, D. G.
Visioni, D.
Kravitz, B.
Richter, J.H.
Felgenhauer, T.
Lee, W. R.
Morrow, D. R.
Parson, E. A.
Sugiyama, M.
Scenarios for modeling solar radiation modification
title Scenarios for modeling solar radiation modification
title_full Scenarios for modeling solar radiation modification
title_fullStr Scenarios for modeling solar radiation modification
title_full_unstemmed Scenarios for modeling solar radiation modification
title_short Scenarios for modeling solar radiation modification
title_sort scenarios for modeling solar radiation modification
topic Physical Sciences
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9388149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35939702
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2202230119
work_keys_str_mv AT macmartindg scenariosformodelingsolarradiationmodification
AT visionid scenariosformodelingsolarradiationmodification
AT kravitzb scenariosformodelingsolarradiationmodification
AT richterjh scenariosformodelingsolarradiationmodification
AT felgenhauert scenariosformodelingsolarradiationmodification
AT leewr scenariosformodelingsolarradiationmodification
AT morrowdr scenariosformodelingsolarradiationmodification
AT parsonea scenariosformodelingsolarradiationmodification
AT sugiyamam scenariosformodelingsolarradiationmodification