Diagnostic Value and Prognostic Significance of Procalcitonin Combined with C-Reactive Protein in Patients with Bacterial Bloodstream Infection

OBJECTIVE: To study the clinical values and implications for the prognosis of procalcitonin (PCT) combined with C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) in patients with bacterial bloodstream infection. METHODS: One hundred and twenty patients with infection hospitalized from Mar. 2020 to Jun. 2021 were chosen as subjects. All participants were tested for serum PCT, hs-CRP, and blood culture. According to the types of pathogenic bacteria, they were divided into the gram-negative bacteria bloodstream infection group (n = 53) and the gram-positive bacteria bloodstream infection group (n = 31). Depending on the prognostic outcome of the participants after 28 days, they were categorized into survival and fatality cohorts. The PCT and hs-CRP levels were compared to explore diagnostic value implications for the prognosis of the cases with bacterial bloodstream infection. RESULTS: Serum PCT and hs-CRP values in the positive cohort were higher than those in the negative cohort. The levels of serum PCT and hs-CRP in pulmonary infection were higher than those in the group with negative cases, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). There were 27 gram-positive participants and 9 gram-negative cases in the positive cohort. The serum PCT value of gram-negative bacterial infection was greater than that of gram-positive bacterial infection. The value of serum PCT in the gram-negative bacterial infection group was higher than that in the gram-positive bacterial infection group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The areas under the curve (AUCs) of PCT, combination of hs-CRP and PCT, and hs-CRP were 0.946, 0.783, and 0.991, respectively. The combined examination of PCT and hs-CRP was the largest, PCT was the second, and hs-CRP was the lowest. These results indicated that the accuracy of combined detection of PCT and hs-CRP in the diagnostic bloodstream infection was the highest (0.991), followed by PCT (0.946) and the lowest (0.783). The PCT and hs-CRP levels of the survival cohort were lower than those in the death cohort. AUCs of PCT, hs-CRP and PCT, and hs-CRP were 0.848, 0.826, and 0.934, respectively. The combined examination of PCT and hs-CRP was the largest, followed by PCT and hs-CRP. The accuracy of the combination of PCT and hs-CRP was the highest (0.934), followed by PCT (0.848), and the diagnostic accuracy of hs-CRP was the lowest (0.826). CONCLUSION: There were significant differences in the levels of PCT and CRP between the gram-positive bacteria group and the gram-positive bacteria group. PCT and CRP have high diagnostic values in predicting the short-term prognosis of patients. PCT and CRP assist clinical diagnosis and guide treatment and play a positive role in early treatment and prognosis evaluation of patients.