Cargando…
Quantitative CT perfusion imaging in patients with pancreatic cancer: a systematic review
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related death with a 5-year survival rate of 10%. Quantitative CT perfusion (CTP) can provide additional diagnostic information compared to the limited accuracy of the current standard, contrast-enhanced CT (CECT). This sys...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9388409/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34223961 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-021-03190-w |
_version_ | 1784770219306123264 |
---|---|
author | Perik, T. H. van Genugten, E. A. J. Aarntzen, E. H. J. G. Smit, E. J. Huisman, H. J. Hermans, J. J. |
author_facet | Perik, T. H. van Genugten, E. A. J. Aarntzen, E. H. J. G. Smit, E. J. Huisman, H. J. Hermans, J. J. |
author_sort | Perik, T. H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related death with a 5-year survival rate of 10%. Quantitative CT perfusion (CTP) can provide additional diagnostic information compared to the limited accuracy of the current standard, contrast-enhanced CT (CECT). This systematic review evaluates CTP for diagnosis, grading, and treatment assessment of PDAC. The secondary goal is to provide an overview of scan protocols and perfusion models used for CTP in PDAC. The search strategy combined synonyms for ‘CTP’ and ‘PDAC.’ Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science were systematically searched from January 2000 to December 2020 for studies using CTP to evaluate PDAC. The risk of bias was assessed using QUADAS-2. 607 abstracts were screened, of which 29 were selected for full-text eligibility. 21 studies were included in the final analysis with a total of 760 patients. All studies comparing PDAC with non-tumorous parenchyma found significant CTP-based differences in blood flow (BF) and blood volume (BV). Two studies found significant differences between pathological grades. Two other studies showed that BF could predict neoadjuvant treatment response. A wide variety in kinetic models and acquisition protocol was found among included studies. Quantitative CTP shows a potential benefit in PDAC diagnosis and can serve as a tool for pathological grading and treatment assessment; however, clinical evidence is still limited. To improve clinical use, standardized acquisition and reconstruction parameters are necessary for interchangeability of the perfusion parameters. GRAPHIC ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00261-021-03190-w. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9388409 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93884092022-08-20 Quantitative CT perfusion imaging in patients with pancreatic cancer: a systematic review Perik, T. H. van Genugten, E. A. J. Aarntzen, E. H. J. G. Smit, E. J. Huisman, H. J. Hermans, J. J. Abdom Radiol (NY) Special Section: Quantitative Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related death with a 5-year survival rate of 10%. Quantitative CT perfusion (CTP) can provide additional diagnostic information compared to the limited accuracy of the current standard, contrast-enhanced CT (CECT). This systematic review evaluates CTP for diagnosis, grading, and treatment assessment of PDAC. The secondary goal is to provide an overview of scan protocols and perfusion models used for CTP in PDAC. The search strategy combined synonyms for ‘CTP’ and ‘PDAC.’ Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science were systematically searched from January 2000 to December 2020 for studies using CTP to evaluate PDAC. The risk of bias was assessed using QUADAS-2. 607 abstracts were screened, of which 29 were selected for full-text eligibility. 21 studies were included in the final analysis with a total of 760 patients. All studies comparing PDAC with non-tumorous parenchyma found significant CTP-based differences in blood flow (BF) and blood volume (BV). Two studies found significant differences between pathological grades. Two other studies showed that BF could predict neoadjuvant treatment response. A wide variety in kinetic models and acquisition protocol was found among included studies. Quantitative CTP shows a potential benefit in PDAC diagnosis and can serve as a tool for pathological grading and treatment assessment; however, clinical evidence is still limited. To improve clinical use, standardized acquisition and reconstruction parameters are necessary for interchangeability of the perfusion parameters. GRAPHIC ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00261-021-03190-w. Springer US 2021-07-05 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9388409/ /pubmed/34223961 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-021-03190-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Special Section: Quantitative Perik, T. H. van Genugten, E. A. J. Aarntzen, E. H. J. G. Smit, E. J. Huisman, H. J. Hermans, J. J. Quantitative CT perfusion imaging in patients with pancreatic cancer: a systematic review |
title | Quantitative CT perfusion imaging in patients with pancreatic cancer: a systematic review |
title_full | Quantitative CT perfusion imaging in patients with pancreatic cancer: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Quantitative CT perfusion imaging in patients with pancreatic cancer: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantitative CT perfusion imaging in patients with pancreatic cancer: a systematic review |
title_short | Quantitative CT perfusion imaging in patients with pancreatic cancer: a systematic review |
title_sort | quantitative ct perfusion imaging in patients with pancreatic cancer: a systematic review |
topic | Special Section: Quantitative |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9388409/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34223961 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-021-03190-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT perikth quantitativectperfusionimaginginpatientswithpancreaticcancerasystematicreview AT vangenugteneaj quantitativectperfusionimaginginpatientswithpancreaticcancerasystematicreview AT aarntzenehjg quantitativectperfusionimaginginpatientswithpancreaticcancerasystematicreview AT smitej quantitativectperfusionimaginginpatientswithpancreaticcancerasystematicreview AT huismanhj quantitativectperfusionimaginginpatientswithpancreaticcancerasystematicreview AT hermansjj quantitativectperfusionimaginginpatientswithpancreaticcancerasystematicreview |