Cargando…

DenseUNets with feedback non-local attention for the segmentation of specular microscopy images of the corneal endothelium with guttae

Corneal guttae, which are the abnormal growth of extracellular matrix in the corneal endothelium, are observed in specular images as black droplets that occlude the endothelial cells. To estimate the corneal parameters (endothelial cell density [ECD], coefficient of variation [CV], and hexagonality...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vigueras-Guillén, Juan P., van Rooij, Jeroen, van Dooren, Bart T. H., Lemij, Hans G., Islamaj, Esma, van Vliet, Lucas J., Vermeer, Koenraad A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9388684/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35982194
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-18180-1
_version_ 1784770266695467008
author Vigueras-Guillén, Juan P.
van Rooij, Jeroen
van Dooren, Bart T. H.
Lemij, Hans G.
Islamaj, Esma
van Vliet, Lucas J.
Vermeer, Koenraad A.
author_facet Vigueras-Guillén, Juan P.
van Rooij, Jeroen
van Dooren, Bart T. H.
Lemij, Hans G.
Islamaj, Esma
van Vliet, Lucas J.
Vermeer, Koenraad A.
author_sort Vigueras-Guillén, Juan P.
collection PubMed
description Corneal guttae, which are the abnormal growth of extracellular matrix in the corneal endothelium, are observed in specular images as black droplets that occlude the endothelial cells. To estimate the corneal parameters (endothelial cell density [ECD], coefficient of variation [CV], and hexagonality [HEX]), we propose a new deep learning method that includes a novel attention mechanism (named fNLA), which helps to infer the cell edges in the occluded areas. The approach first derives the cell edges, then infers the well-detected cells, and finally employs a postprocessing method to fix mistakes. This results in a binary segmentation from which the corneal parameters are estimated. We analyzed 1203 images (500 contained guttae) obtained with a Topcon SP-1P microscope. To generate the ground truth, we performed manual segmentation in all images. Several networks were evaluated (UNet, ResUNeXt, DenseUNets, UNet++, etc.) and we found that DenseUNets with fNLA provided the lowest error: a mean absolute error of 23.16 [cells/mm[Formula: see text] ] in ECD, 1.28 [%] in CV, and 3.13 [%] in HEX. Compared with Topcon’s built-in software, our error was 3–6 times smaller. Overall, our approach handled notably well the cells affected by guttae, detecting cell edges partially occluded by small guttae and discarding large areas covered by extensive guttae.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9388684
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93886842022-08-20 DenseUNets with feedback non-local attention for the segmentation of specular microscopy images of the corneal endothelium with guttae Vigueras-Guillén, Juan P. van Rooij, Jeroen van Dooren, Bart T. H. Lemij, Hans G. Islamaj, Esma van Vliet, Lucas J. Vermeer, Koenraad A. Sci Rep Article Corneal guttae, which are the abnormal growth of extracellular matrix in the corneal endothelium, are observed in specular images as black droplets that occlude the endothelial cells. To estimate the corneal parameters (endothelial cell density [ECD], coefficient of variation [CV], and hexagonality [HEX]), we propose a new deep learning method that includes a novel attention mechanism (named fNLA), which helps to infer the cell edges in the occluded areas. The approach first derives the cell edges, then infers the well-detected cells, and finally employs a postprocessing method to fix mistakes. This results in a binary segmentation from which the corneal parameters are estimated. We analyzed 1203 images (500 contained guttae) obtained with a Topcon SP-1P microscope. To generate the ground truth, we performed manual segmentation in all images. Several networks were evaluated (UNet, ResUNeXt, DenseUNets, UNet++, etc.) and we found that DenseUNets with fNLA provided the lowest error: a mean absolute error of 23.16 [cells/mm[Formula: see text] ] in ECD, 1.28 [%] in CV, and 3.13 [%] in HEX. Compared with Topcon’s built-in software, our error was 3–6 times smaller. Overall, our approach handled notably well the cells affected by guttae, detecting cell edges partially occluded by small guttae and discarding large areas covered by extensive guttae. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9388684/ /pubmed/35982194 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-18180-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Vigueras-Guillén, Juan P.
van Rooij, Jeroen
van Dooren, Bart T. H.
Lemij, Hans G.
Islamaj, Esma
van Vliet, Lucas J.
Vermeer, Koenraad A.
DenseUNets with feedback non-local attention for the segmentation of specular microscopy images of the corneal endothelium with guttae
title DenseUNets with feedback non-local attention for the segmentation of specular microscopy images of the corneal endothelium with guttae
title_full DenseUNets with feedback non-local attention for the segmentation of specular microscopy images of the corneal endothelium with guttae
title_fullStr DenseUNets with feedback non-local attention for the segmentation of specular microscopy images of the corneal endothelium with guttae
title_full_unstemmed DenseUNets with feedback non-local attention for the segmentation of specular microscopy images of the corneal endothelium with guttae
title_short DenseUNets with feedback non-local attention for the segmentation of specular microscopy images of the corneal endothelium with guttae
title_sort denseunets with feedback non-local attention for the segmentation of specular microscopy images of the corneal endothelium with guttae
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9388684/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35982194
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-18180-1
work_keys_str_mv AT viguerasguillenjuanp denseunetswithfeedbacknonlocalattentionforthesegmentationofspecularmicroscopyimagesofthecornealendotheliumwithguttae
AT vanrooijjeroen denseunetswithfeedbacknonlocalattentionforthesegmentationofspecularmicroscopyimagesofthecornealendotheliumwithguttae
AT vandoorenbartth denseunetswithfeedbacknonlocalattentionforthesegmentationofspecularmicroscopyimagesofthecornealendotheliumwithguttae
AT lemijhansg denseunetswithfeedbacknonlocalattentionforthesegmentationofspecularmicroscopyimagesofthecornealendotheliumwithguttae
AT islamajesma denseunetswithfeedbacknonlocalattentionforthesegmentationofspecularmicroscopyimagesofthecornealendotheliumwithguttae
AT vanvlietlucasj denseunetswithfeedbacknonlocalattentionforthesegmentationofspecularmicroscopyimagesofthecornealendotheliumwithguttae
AT vermeerkoenraada denseunetswithfeedbacknonlocalattentionforthesegmentationofspecularmicroscopyimagesofthecornealendotheliumwithguttae