Cargando…

Comparison of Anterior Segment Measurements with a New Multifunctional Unit and Five Other Devices

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical availability of a multifunctional ocular biometric unit, MR-6000, for simultaneous keratometry, tonometry, topography, and pachymetry evaluation, and compare anterior segment measurements with five other devices: autokeratometer (KR-1), Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Bo Yi, Jun, Ikhyun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Ophthalmological Society 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9388890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35766048
http://dx.doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2022.0025
_version_ 1784770313047769088
author Kim, Bo Yi
Jun, Ikhyun
author_facet Kim, Bo Yi
Jun, Ikhyun
author_sort Kim, Bo Yi
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical availability of a multifunctional ocular biometric unit, MR-6000, for simultaneous keratometry, tonometry, topography, and pachymetry evaluation, and compare anterior segment measurements with five other devices: autokeratometer (KR-1), Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam HR), swept-source optical coherence tomography (IOLMaster 700), Placido disk scanning-slit topography (Orbscan II), and noncontact tonometry (FT-1000). METHODS: Thirty eyes from thirty patients who visited Severance Hospital for cataract surgery were examined using MR-6000 and the other devices. The mean keratometry, central corneal thickness (CCT), white-to-white (WTW) distance, and intraocular pressure (IOP) values were compared. Repeated measures analysis of variance, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and Bland-Altman plot were used to assess the correlation and agreement between devices. RESULTS: Thirty eyes of thirty patients were evaluated. Statistically significant differences in mean keratometry between MR-6000, KR-1, Pentacam HR, and IOLMaster 700 were not observed (p > 0.05). All five devices, including Orbscan II, had almost perfect agreement in measuring keratometry (ICC > 0.80, p < 0.05). CCT measured by MR-6000 was significantly different from that of Pentacam HR and Orbscan II measurements (p < 0.05) but correlated with that of Pentacam HR and Orbscan II measurements (ICC > 0.60, p < 0.05). The WTW distance measured by MR-6000 was not significantly different from that measured by IOLMaster 700 but was different from that measured by Orbscan II. IOP measured by MR-6000 was not correlated with FT-1000. CONCLUSIONS: Keratometric values obtained through MR-6000 can be used interchangeably with other devices based on good correlation and agreement. However, the CCT, WTW, and IOP values were not interchangeable with a single multifunctional unit for cataract surgery preoperative examination.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9388890
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Korean Ophthalmological Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93888902022-08-22 Comparison of Anterior Segment Measurements with a New Multifunctional Unit and Five Other Devices Kim, Bo Yi Jun, Ikhyun Korean J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical availability of a multifunctional ocular biometric unit, MR-6000, for simultaneous keratometry, tonometry, topography, and pachymetry evaluation, and compare anterior segment measurements with five other devices: autokeratometer (KR-1), Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam HR), swept-source optical coherence tomography (IOLMaster 700), Placido disk scanning-slit topography (Orbscan II), and noncontact tonometry (FT-1000). METHODS: Thirty eyes from thirty patients who visited Severance Hospital for cataract surgery were examined using MR-6000 and the other devices. The mean keratometry, central corneal thickness (CCT), white-to-white (WTW) distance, and intraocular pressure (IOP) values were compared. Repeated measures analysis of variance, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and Bland-Altman plot were used to assess the correlation and agreement between devices. RESULTS: Thirty eyes of thirty patients were evaluated. Statistically significant differences in mean keratometry between MR-6000, KR-1, Pentacam HR, and IOLMaster 700 were not observed (p > 0.05). All five devices, including Orbscan II, had almost perfect agreement in measuring keratometry (ICC > 0.80, p < 0.05). CCT measured by MR-6000 was significantly different from that of Pentacam HR and Orbscan II measurements (p < 0.05) but correlated with that of Pentacam HR and Orbscan II measurements (ICC > 0.60, p < 0.05). The WTW distance measured by MR-6000 was not significantly different from that measured by IOLMaster 700 but was different from that measured by Orbscan II. IOP measured by MR-6000 was not correlated with FT-1000. CONCLUSIONS: Keratometric values obtained through MR-6000 can be used interchangeably with other devices based on good correlation and agreement. However, the CCT, WTW, and IOP values were not interchangeable with a single multifunctional unit for cataract surgery preoperative examination. Korean Ophthalmological Society 2022-08 2022-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9388890/ /pubmed/35766048 http://dx.doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2022.0025 Text en © 2022 The Korean Ophthalmological Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access journal distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Bo Yi
Jun, Ikhyun
Comparison of Anterior Segment Measurements with a New Multifunctional Unit and Five Other Devices
title Comparison of Anterior Segment Measurements with a New Multifunctional Unit and Five Other Devices
title_full Comparison of Anterior Segment Measurements with a New Multifunctional Unit and Five Other Devices
title_fullStr Comparison of Anterior Segment Measurements with a New Multifunctional Unit and Five Other Devices
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Anterior Segment Measurements with a New Multifunctional Unit and Five Other Devices
title_short Comparison of Anterior Segment Measurements with a New Multifunctional Unit and Five Other Devices
title_sort comparison of anterior segment measurements with a new multifunctional unit and five other devices
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9388890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35766048
http://dx.doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2022.0025
work_keys_str_mv AT kimboyi comparisonofanteriorsegmentmeasurementswithanewmultifunctionalunitandfiveotherdevices
AT junikhyun comparisonofanteriorsegmentmeasurementswithanewmultifunctionalunitandfiveotherdevices