Cargando…

Comparison of 3DCRT and IMRT out-of-field doses in pediatric patients using Monte Carlo simulations with treatment planning system calculations and measurements

3DCRT and IMRT out-of-field doses in pediatric patients were compared using Monte Carlo simulations with treatment planning system calculations and measurements. PURPOSE: Out-of-field doses are given to healthy tissues, which may allow the development of second tumors. The use of IMRT in pediatric p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sá, Ana Cravo, Barateiro, Andreia, Bednarz, Bryan P., Almeida, Pedro, Vaz, Pedro, Madaleno, Tiago
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9388939/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35992845
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.879167
_version_ 1784770325006778368
author Sá, Ana Cravo
Barateiro, Andreia
Bednarz, Bryan P.
Almeida, Pedro
Vaz, Pedro
Madaleno, Tiago
author_facet Sá, Ana Cravo
Barateiro, Andreia
Bednarz, Bryan P.
Almeida, Pedro
Vaz, Pedro
Madaleno, Tiago
author_sort Sá, Ana Cravo
collection PubMed
description 3DCRT and IMRT out-of-field doses in pediatric patients were compared using Monte Carlo simulations with treatment planning system calculations and measurements. PURPOSE: Out-of-field doses are given to healthy tissues, which may allow the development of second tumors. The use of IMRT in pediatric patients has been discussed, as it leads to a “bath” of low doses to large volumes of out-of-field organs and tissues. This study aims to compare out-of-field doses in pediatric patients comparing IMRT and 3DCRT techniques using measurements, Monte Carlo (MC) simulations, and treatment planning system (TPS) calculations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total dose of 54 Gy was prescribed to a PTV in the brain of a pediatric anthropomorphic phantom, for both techniques. To assess the out-of-field organ doses for both techniques, two treatment plans were performed with the 3DCRT and IMRT techniques in TPS. Measurements were carried out in a LINAC using a pediatric anthropomorphic phantom and thermoluminescent dosimeters to recreate the treatment plans, previously performed in the TPS. A computational model of a LINAC, the associated multileaf collimators, and a voxelized pediatric phantom implemented in the Monte Carlo N-Particle 6.1 computer program were also used to perform MC simulations of the out-of-field organ doses, for both techniques. RESULTS: The results obtained by measurements and MC simulations indicate a significant increase in dose using the IMRT technique when compared to the 3DCRT technique. More specifically, measurements show higher doses with IMRT, namely, in right eye (13,041 vs. 593 mGy), left eye (6,525 vs. 475 mGy), thyroid (79 vs. 70 mGy), right lung (37 vs. 28 mGy), left lung (27 vs. 20 mGy), and heart (31 vs. 25 mGy). The obtained results indicate that out-of-field doses can be seriously underestimated by TPS. DISCUSSION: This study presents, for the first time, out-of-field dose measurements in a realistic scenario and calculations for IMRT, centered on a voxelized pediatric phantom and an MC model of a medical LINAC, including MLC with log file-based simulations. The results pinpoint significant discrepancies in out-of-field doses for the two techniques and are a cause of concern because TPS calculations cannot accurately predict such doses. The obtained doses may presumably increase the risk of development of second tumors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9388939
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93889392022-08-20 Comparison of 3DCRT and IMRT out-of-field doses in pediatric patients using Monte Carlo simulations with treatment planning system calculations and measurements Sá, Ana Cravo Barateiro, Andreia Bednarz, Bryan P. Almeida, Pedro Vaz, Pedro Madaleno, Tiago Front Oncol Oncology 3DCRT and IMRT out-of-field doses in pediatric patients were compared using Monte Carlo simulations with treatment planning system calculations and measurements. PURPOSE: Out-of-field doses are given to healthy tissues, which may allow the development of second tumors. The use of IMRT in pediatric patients has been discussed, as it leads to a “bath” of low doses to large volumes of out-of-field organs and tissues. This study aims to compare out-of-field doses in pediatric patients comparing IMRT and 3DCRT techniques using measurements, Monte Carlo (MC) simulations, and treatment planning system (TPS) calculations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total dose of 54 Gy was prescribed to a PTV in the brain of a pediatric anthropomorphic phantom, for both techniques. To assess the out-of-field organ doses for both techniques, two treatment plans were performed with the 3DCRT and IMRT techniques in TPS. Measurements were carried out in a LINAC using a pediatric anthropomorphic phantom and thermoluminescent dosimeters to recreate the treatment plans, previously performed in the TPS. A computational model of a LINAC, the associated multileaf collimators, and a voxelized pediatric phantom implemented in the Monte Carlo N-Particle 6.1 computer program were also used to perform MC simulations of the out-of-field organ doses, for both techniques. RESULTS: The results obtained by measurements and MC simulations indicate a significant increase in dose using the IMRT technique when compared to the 3DCRT technique. More specifically, measurements show higher doses with IMRT, namely, in right eye (13,041 vs. 593 mGy), left eye (6,525 vs. 475 mGy), thyroid (79 vs. 70 mGy), right lung (37 vs. 28 mGy), left lung (27 vs. 20 mGy), and heart (31 vs. 25 mGy). The obtained results indicate that out-of-field doses can be seriously underestimated by TPS. DISCUSSION: This study presents, for the first time, out-of-field dose measurements in a realistic scenario and calculations for IMRT, centered on a voxelized pediatric phantom and an MC model of a medical LINAC, including MLC with log file-based simulations. The results pinpoint significant discrepancies in out-of-field doses for the two techniques and are a cause of concern because TPS calculations cannot accurately predict such doses. The obtained doses may presumably increase the risk of development of second tumors. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9388939/ /pubmed/35992845 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.879167 Text en Copyright © 2022 Sá, Barateiro, Bednarz, Almeida, Vaz and Madaleno https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Sá, Ana Cravo
Barateiro, Andreia
Bednarz, Bryan P.
Almeida, Pedro
Vaz, Pedro
Madaleno, Tiago
Comparison of 3DCRT and IMRT out-of-field doses in pediatric patients using Monte Carlo simulations with treatment planning system calculations and measurements
title Comparison of 3DCRT and IMRT out-of-field doses in pediatric patients using Monte Carlo simulations with treatment planning system calculations and measurements
title_full Comparison of 3DCRT and IMRT out-of-field doses in pediatric patients using Monte Carlo simulations with treatment planning system calculations and measurements
title_fullStr Comparison of 3DCRT and IMRT out-of-field doses in pediatric patients using Monte Carlo simulations with treatment planning system calculations and measurements
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of 3DCRT and IMRT out-of-field doses in pediatric patients using Monte Carlo simulations with treatment planning system calculations and measurements
title_short Comparison of 3DCRT and IMRT out-of-field doses in pediatric patients using Monte Carlo simulations with treatment planning system calculations and measurements
title_sort comparison of 3dcrt and imrt out-of-field doses in pediatric patients using monte carlo simulations with treatment planning system calculations and measurements
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9388939/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35992845
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.879167
work_keys_str_mv AT saanacravo comparisonof3dcrtandimrtoutoffielddosesinpediatricpatientsusingmontecarlosimulationswithtreatmentplanningsystemcalculationsandmeasurements
AT barateiroandreia comparisonof3dcrtandimrtoutoffielddosesinpediatricpatientsusingmontecarlosimulationswithtreatmentplanningsystemcalculationsandmeasurements
AT bednarzbryanp comparisonof3dcrtandimrtoutoffielddosesinpediatricpatientsusingmontecarlosimulationswithtreatmentplanningsystemcalculationsandmeasurements
AT almeidapedro comparisonof3dcrtandimrtoutoffielddosesinpediatricpatientsusingmontecarlosimulationswithtreatmentplanningsystemcalculationsandmeasurements
AT vazpedro comparisonof3dcrtandimrtoutoffielddosesinpediatricpatientsusingmontecarlosimulationswithtreatmentplanningsystemcalculationsandmeasurements
AT madalenotiago comparisonof3dcrtandimrtoutoffielddosesinpediatricpatientsusingmontecarlosimulationswithtreatmentplanningsystemcalculationsandmeasurements