Cargando…

Something Stinks! Finding Ways to Manage Noxious Odours in the Operating Room and Other Clinical Settings A Randomized Controlled Trial

Objectives: The hospital can be saturated with noxious smells. Anecdotally, medical staff apply products to surgical masks to lessen the impact of these smells. This study aimed to determine the odour-masking ability of 4 inexpensive and convenient products. Methods: A randomized, single-blinded cro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bjornson, Lindsay, Van Slyke, Aaron C., Bucevska, Marija, Courtemanche, Rebecca, Bone, Jeffrey, Knox, Aaron, Verchere, Cynthia, Boyle, James C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9389059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35990392
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/22925503211008445
_version_ 1784770354687770624
author Bjornson, Lindsay
Van Slyke, Aaron C.
Bucevska, Marija
Courtemanche, Rebecca
Bone, Jeffrey
Knox, Aaron
Verchere, Cynthia
Boyle, James C.
author_facet Bjornson, Lindsay
Van Slyke, Aaron C.
Bucevska, Marija
Courtemanche, Rebecca
Bone, Jeffrey
Knox, Aaron
Verchere, Cynthia
Boyle, James C.
author_sort Bjornson, Lindsay
collection PubMed
description Objectives: The hospital can be saturated with noxious smells. Anecdotally, medical staff apply products to surgical masks to lessen the impact of these smells. This study aimed to determine the odour-masking ability of 4 inexpensive and convenient products. Methods: A randomized, single-blinded crossover study was conducted in Vancouver, Canada. Participants, 19 to 30 years old, were invited to participate. Participants with active allergies, upper respiratory tract infection, alteration to sense of smell, or failure of olfactory screen were excluded from the study. An experimental odour was used in lieu of a noxious surgical odour. After smelling the experimental odour without barriers, participants were re-exposed to the odour using 5 surgical masks in randomized order. Each mask was lined with a test product (cherry lip balm, tincture of benzoin, Mastisol, mint toothpaste, and control [plain mask]). Participants rated the effectiveness of products at masking the experimental odour from 0 to 100 (0 = completely ineffective, 100 = completely effective). Participants also rated the pleasantness of the products, recorded if the products made them feel unwell, and identified their preferred product overall. Results: Eighty participants were included in the study (33 male, 47 female), averaging 24.2 years of age. Mean odour-masking effectiveness for cherry lip balm was 66.5 (±24.6), tincture of benzoin: 62.6 (±25.0), Mastisol: 61.3 (±23.9), mint toothpaste: 57.5 (±27.4), and control: 21.9 (±21.8). All products performed better than the control (P < .001), but there was no significant difference in performance between products. Cherry lip balm was the most preferred odour-masking product (29 participants), followed by mint toothpaste (22), Mastisol (14), tincture of benzoin (10), and control (5). Conclusions: All tested products demonstrated equivalent odour-masking abilities. If health care professionals choose to use an odour-masking product, they should consider their own olfactory preferences.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9389059
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93890592022-08-20 Something Stinks! Finding Ways to Manage Noxious Odours in the Operating Room and Other Clinical Settings A Randomized Controlled Trial Bjornson, Lindsay Van Slyke, Aaron C. Bucevska, Marija Courtemanche, Rebecca Bone, Jeffrey Knox, Aaron Verchere, Cynthia Boyle, James C. Plast Surg (Oakv) Original Articles Objectives: The hospital can be saturated with noxious smells. Anecdotally, medical staff apply products to surgical masks to lessen the impact of these smells. This study aimed to determine the odour-masking ability of 4 inexpensive and convenient products. Methods: A randomized, single-blinded crossover study was conducted in Vancouver, Canada. Participants, 19 to 30 years old, were invited to participate. Participants with active allergies, upper respiratory tract infection, alteration to sense of smell, or failure of olfactory screen were excluded from the study. An experimental odour was used in lieu of a noxious surgical odour. After smelling the experimental odour without barriers, participants were re-exposed to the odour using 5 surgical masks in randomized order. Each mask was lined with a test product (cherry lip balm, tincture of benzoin, Mastisol, mint toothpaste, and control [plain mask]). Participants rated the effectiveness of products at masking the experimental odour from 0 to 100 (0 = completely ineffective, 100 = completely effective). Participants also rated the pleasantness of the products, recorded if the products made them feel unwell, and identified their preferred product overall. Results: Eighty participants were included in the study (33 male, 47 female), averaging 24.2 years of age. Mean odour-masking effectiveness for cherry lip balm was 66.5 (±24.6), tincture of benzoin: 62.6 (±25.0), Mastisol: 61.3 (±23.9), mint toothpaste: 57.5 (±27.4), and control: 21.9 (±21.8). All products performed better than the control (P < .001), but there was no significant difference in performance between products. Cherry lip balm was the most preferred odour-masking product (29 participants), followed by mint toothpaste (22), Mastisol (14), tincture of benzoin (10), and control (5). Conclusions: All tested products demonstrated equivalent odour-masking abilities. If health care professionals choose to use an odour-masking product, they should consider their own olfactory preferences. SAGE Publications 2021-05-20 2022-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9389059/ /pubmed/35990392 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/22925503211008445 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Bjornson, Lindsay
Van Slyke, Aaron C.
Bucevska, Marija
Courtemanche, Rebecca
Bone, Jeffrey
Knox, Aaron
Verchere, Cynthia
Boyle, James C.
Something Stinks! Finding Ways to Manage Noxious Odours in the Operating Room and Other Clinical Settings A Randomized Controlled Trial
title Something Stinks! Finding Ways to Manage Noxious Odours in the Operating Room and Other Clinical Settings A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Something Stinks! Finding Ways to Manage Noxious Odours in the Operating Room and Other Clinical Settings A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Something Stinks! Finding Ways to Manage Noxious Odours in the Operating Room and Other Clinical Settings A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Something Stinks! Finding Ways to Manage Noxious Odours in the Operating Room and Other Clinical Settings A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Something Stinks! Finding Ways to Manage Noxious Odours in the Operating Room and Other Clinical Settings A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort something stinks! finding ways to manage noxious odours in the operating room and other clinical settings a randomized controlled trial
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9389059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35990392
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/22925503211008445
work_keys_str_mv AT bjornsonlindsay somethingstinksfindingwaystomanagenoxiousodoursintheoperatingroomandotherclinicalsettingsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vanslykeaaronc somethingstinksfindingwaystomanagenoxiousodoursintheoperatingroomandotherclinicalsettingsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bucevskamarija somethingstinksfindingwaystomanagenoxiousodoursintheoperatingroomandotherclinicalsettingsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT courtemancherebecca somethingstinksfindingwaystomanagenoxiousodoursintheoperatingroomandotherclinicalsettingsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bonejeffrey somethingstinksfindingwaystomanagenoxiousodoursintheoperatingroomandotherclinicalsettingsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT knoxaaron somethingstinksfindingwaystomanagenoxiousodoursintheoperatingroomandotherclinicalsettingsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vercherecynthia somethingstinksfindingwaystomanagenoxiousodoursintheoperatingroomandotherclinicalsettingsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT boylejamesc somethingstinksfindingwaystomanagenoxiousodoursintheoperatingroomandotherclinicalsettingsarandomizedcontrolledtrial