Cargando…

Reporting of data on participant ethnicity and socioeconomic status in high-impact medical journals: a targeted literature review

OBJECTIVES: To assess the frequency of reporting of ethnicity (or ‘race’) and socioeconomic status (SES) indicators in high-impact journals. DESIGN: Targeted literature review. DATA SOURCES: The 10 highest ranked general medical journals using Google scholar h5 index. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Inclusion...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Buttery, Sara C, Philip, Keir E J, Alghamdi, Saeed M, Williams, Parris J, Quint, Jennifer K, Hopkinson, Nicholas S
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:	Medical Publishing and Peer Review
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9389090/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35977760 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064276

Ejemplares similares

Conflict-of-interest disclosure at medical journals in Japan: a nationwide survey of the practices of journal secretariats
por: Kojima, Takako, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Open access policies of leading medical journals: a cross-sectional study
por: Ellison, Tim S, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Journal editors’ perspectives on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in biomedical journals: a qualitative study
por: Glonti, Ketevan, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Data-sharing recommendations in biomedical journals and randomised controlled trials: an audit of journals following the ICMJE recommendations
por: Siebert, Maximilian, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Editors’ and authors’ individual conflicts of interest disclosure and journal transparency. A cross-sectional study of high-impact medical specialty journals
por: Dal-Ré, Rafael, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Cross-sectional study of the relationship between women’s representation among editors and peer reviewers in journals of the British Medical Journal Publishing Group
por: Pinho-Gomes, Ana-Catarina, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Plagiarism in research: a survey of African medical journals
por: Rohwer, Anke, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Non-inferiority trials: are they inferior? A systematic review of reporting in major medical journals
por: Rehal, Sunita, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Knowledge and motivations of researchers publishing in presumed predatory journals: a survey
por: Cobey, Kelly D, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Has open data arrived at the British Medical Journal (BMJ)? An observational study
por: Rowhani-Farid, Anisa, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Role of supplementary material in biomedical journal articles: surveys of authors, reviewers and readers
por: Price, Amy, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Editors’ perspectives on the peer-review process in biomedical journals: protocol for a qualitative study
por: Glonti, Ketevan, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Cross-sectional study of preprints and final journal publications from COVID-19 studies: discrepancies in results reporting and spin in interpretation
por: Bero, Lisa, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Assessing the impact of predatory journals on policy and guidance documents: a cross-sectional study protocol
por: Brandts-Longtin, Olivier, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

A scoping review protocol on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals
por: Glonti, Ketevan, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Gender and ethnic differences in publication of BMJ letters to the editor: an observational study using machine learning
por: Zeina, Mohamad, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Fate of manuscripts rejected by a non-English-language general medical journal: a retrospective cohort study
por: Vinther, Siri, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Reporting quality of abstracts of trials published in top five pain journals: a protocol for a systematic survey
por: Sriganesh, Kamath, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Characteristics of scholars who review for predatory and legitimate journals: linkage study of Cabells Scholarly Analytics and Publons data
por: Severin, Anna, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Reporting quality of randomised controlled trial abstracts among high-impact general medical journals: a review and analysis
por: Hays, Meredith, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

How are risk ratios reported in orthopaedic surgery journals? A descriptive study of formats used to report absolute risks
por: Petrova, Dafina, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Quantifying gender disparity in physician authorship among commentary articles in three high-impact medical journals: an observational study
por: Mamtani, Mira, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Gender disparity between authors in leading medical journals during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional review
por: Misra, Vaidehi, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Protocol for a meta-research study of protocols for diet or nutrition-related trials published in indexed journals: general aspects of study design, rationale and reporting limitations
por: Silva, Flávia Moraes, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Bibliometric analysis of scientific publications in transplantation journals from Mainland China, Japan, South Korea and Taiwan between 2006 and 2015
por: Pu, Qiang-Hong, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Survey of quality and clarity of methods and results reporting in 1 year of intervention studies published in high-impact medical and psychiatric journals
por: Ravichandran, Caitlin, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Peer review comments on drug trials submitted to medical journals differ depending on sponsorship, results and acceptance: a retrospective cohort study
por: van Lent, Marlies, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Authorship inequality: a bibliometric study of the concentration of authorship among a diminishing number of individuals in high-impact medical journals, 2008–2019
por: Hart, Kamber L, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Differences in reporting serious adverse events in industry sponsored clinical trial registries and journal articles on antidepressant and antipsychotic drugs: a cross-sectional study
por: Hughes, Shannon, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Perception of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement of authors publishing reviews in nursing journals: a cross-sectional online survey
por: Tam, Wilson W S, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Impact of a short version of the CONSORT checklist for peer reviewers to improve the reporting of randomised controlled trials published in biomedical journals: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
por: Speich, Benjamin, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The impact of a streamlined funding application process on application time: two cross-sectional surveys of Australian researchers
por: Barnett, Adrian G, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Using simplified peer review processes to fund research: a prospective study
por: Herbert, Danielle L, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Time to publication for publicly funded clinical trials in Australia: an observational study
por: Strand, Linn Beate, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Strategies to deliver smoking cessation interventions during targeted lung health screening - a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Williams, Parris J, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Smoking and socioeconomic factors linked to acute exacerbations of COPD: analysis from an Asthma + Lung UK survey
por: Williams, Parris J, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Guidance for reporting outcomes in clinical trials: scoping review protocol
por: Butcher, Nancy J, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Relationship between maternal hypoglycaemia and small-for-gestational-age infants according to maternal weight status: a retrospective cohort study in two hospitals
por: Shinohara, Satoshi, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Results availability and timeliness of registered COVID-19 clinical trials: interim cross-sectional results from the DIRECCT study
por: Salholz-Hillel, Maia, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Bias in dissemination of clinical research findings: structured OPEN framework of what, who and why, based on literature review and expert consensus
por: Bassler, Dirk, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_tfeouchpfqqtiit04h4328n6ad