Cargando…
Incorporating productivity loss in health economic evaluations: a review of guidelines and practices worldwide for research agenda in China
INTRODUCTION: Productivity loss may contribute to a large proportion of costs of health conditions in an economic evaluation from a societal perspective, but there is currently a lack of methodological consensus on how productivity loss should be measured and valued. Despite the research progress su...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9389102/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35977755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009777 |
_version_ | 1784770365443014656 |
---|---|
author | Jiang, Shan Wang, Yitong Si, Lei Zang, Xiao Gu, Yuan-Yuan Jiang, Yawen Liu, Gordon G Wu, Jing |
author_facet | Jiang, Shan Wang, Yitong Si, Lei Zang, Xiao Gu, Yuan-Yuan Jiang, Yawen Liu, Gordon G Wu, Jing |
author_sort | Jiang, Shan |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Productivity loss may contribute to a large proportion of costs of health conditions in an economic evaluation from a societal perspective, but there is currently a lack of methodological consensus on how productivity loss should be measured and valued. Despite the research progress surrounding this issue in other countries, it has been rarely discussed in China. METHODS: We reviewed the official guidelines on economic evaluations in different countries and regions and screened the literature to summarise the extent to which productivity loss was incorporated in economic evaluations and the underlying methodological challenges. RESULTS: A total of 48 guidelines from 46 countries/regions were included. Although 32 (67%) guidelines recommend excluding productivity loss in the base case analysis, 23 (48%) guidelines recommend including productivity loss in the base case or additional analyses. Through a review of systematic reviews and the economic evaluation studies included in these reviews, we found that the average probability of incorporating productivity loss in an economic evaluation was 10.2%. Among the economic evaluations (n=478) that explicitly considered productivity loss, most (n=455) considered losses from paid work, while only a few studies (n=23) considered unpaid work losses. Recognising the existing methodological challenges and the specific context of China, we proposed a practical research agenda and a disease list for progress on this topic, including the development of the disease list comprehensively consisting of health conditions where the productivity loss should be incorporated into economic evaluations. CONCLUSION: An increasing number of guidelines recommend the inclusion of productivity loss in the base case or additional analyses of economic evaluation. We optimistically expect that more Chinese researchers notice the importance of incorporating productivity loss in economic evaluations and anticipate guidelines that may be suitable for Chinese practitioners and decision-makers that facilitate the advancement of research on productivity loss measurement and valuation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9389102 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93891022022-09-06 Incorporating productivity loss in health economic evaluations: a review of guidelines and practices worldwide for research agenda in China Jiang, Shan Wang, Yitong Si, Lei Zang, Xiao Gu, Yuan-Yuan Jiang, Yawen Liu, Gordon G Wu, Jing BMJ Glob Health Original Research INTRODUCTION: Productivity loss may contribute to a large proportion of costs of health conditions in an economic evaluation from a societal perspective, but there is currently a lack of methodological consensus on how productivity loss should be measured and valued. Despite the research progress surrounding this issue in other countries, it has been rarely discussed in China. METHODS: We reviewed the official guidelines on economic evaluations in different countries and regions and screened the literature to summarise the extent to which productivity loss was incorporated in economic evaluations and the underlying methodological challenges. RESULTS: A total of 48 guidelines from 46 countries/regions were included. Although 32 (67%) guidelines recommend excluding productivity loss in the base case analysis, 23 (48%) guidelines recommend including productivity loss in the base case or additional analyses. Through a review of systematic reviews and the economic evaluation studies included in these reviews, we found that the average probability of incorporating productivity loss in an economic evaluation was 10.2%. Among the economic evaluations (n=478) that explicitly considered productivity loss, most (n=455) considered losses from paid work, while only a few studies (n=23) considered unpaid work losses. Recognising the existing methodological challenges and the specific context of China, we proposed a practical research agenda and a disease list for progress on this topic, including the development of the disease list comprehensively consisting of health conditions where the productivity loss should be incorporated into economic evaluations. CONCLUSION: An increasing number of guidelines recommend the inclusion of productivity loss in the base case or additional analyses of economic evaluation. We optimistically expect that more Chinese researchers notice the importance of incorporating productivity loss in economic evaluations and anticipate guidelines that may be suitable for Chinese practitioners and decision-makers that facilitate the advancement of research on productivity loss measurement and valuation. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9389102/ /pubmed/35977755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009777 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Jiang, Shan Wang, Yitong Si, Lei Zang, Xiao Gu, Yuan-Yuan Jiang, Yawen Liu, Gordon G Wu, Jing Incorporating productivity loss in health economic evaluations: a review of guidelines and practices worldwide for research agenda in China |
title | Incorporating productivity loss in health economic evaluations: a review of guidelines and practices worldwide for research agenda in China |
title_full | Incorporating productivity loss in health economic evaluations: a review of guidelines and practices worldwide for research agenda in China |
title_fullStr | Incorporating productivity loss in health economic evaluations: a review of guidelines and practices worldwide for research agenda in China |
title_full_unstemmed | Incorporating productivity loss in health economic evaluations: a review of guidelines and practices worldwide for research agenda in China |
title_short | Incorporating productivity loss in health economic evaluations: a review of guidelines and practices worldwide for research agenda in China |
title_sort | incorporating productivity loss in health economic evaluations: a review of guidelines and practices worldwide for research agenda in china |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9389102/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35977755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009777 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jiangshan incorporatingproductivitylossinhealtheconomicevaluationsareviewofguidelinesandpracticesworldwideforresearchagendainchina AT wangyitong incorporatingproductivitylossinhealtheconomicevaluationsareviewofguidelinesandpracticesworldwideforresearchagendainchina AT silei incorporatingproductivitylossinhealtheconomicevaluationsareviewofguidelinesandpracticesworldwideforresearchagendainchina AT zangxiao incorporatingproductivitylossinhealtheconomicevaluationsareviewofguidelinesandpracticesworldwideforresearchagendainchina AT guyuanyuan incorporatingproductivitylossinhealtheconomicevaluationsareviewofguidelinesandpracticesworldwideforresearchagendainchina AT jiangyawen incorporatingproductivitylossinhealtheconomicevaluationsareviewofguidelinesandpracticesworldwideforresearchagendainchina AT liugordong incorporatingproductivitylossinhealtheconomicevaluationsareviewofguidelinesandpracticesworldwideforresearchagendainchina AT wujing incorporatingproductivitylossinhealtheconomicevaluationsareviewofguidelinesandpracticesworldwideforresearchagendainchina |