Cargando…

Incorporating productivity loss in health economic evaluations: a review of guidelines and practices worldwide for research agenda in China

INTRODUCTION: Productivity loss may contribute to a large proportion of costs of health conditions in an economic evaluation from a societal perspective, but there is currently a lack of methodological consensus on how productivity loss should be measured and valued. Despite the research progress su...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jiang, Shan, Wang, Yitong, Si, Lei, Zang, Xiao, Gu, Yuan-Yuan, Jiang, Yawen, Liu, Gordon G, Wu, Jing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9389102/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35977755
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009777
_version_ 1784770365443014656
author Jiang, Shan
Wang, Yitong
Si, Lei
Zang, Xiao
Gu, Yuan-Yuan
Jiang, Yawen
Liu, Gordon G
Wu, Jing
author_facet Jiang, Shan
Wang, Yitong
Si, Lei
Zang, Xiao
Gu, Yuan-Yuan
Jiang, Yawen
Liu, Gordon G
Wu, Jing
author_sort Jiang, Shan
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Productivity loss may contribute to a large proportion of costs of health conditions in an economic evaluation from a societal perspective, but there is currently a lack of methodological consensus on how productivity loss should be measured and valued. Despite the research progress surrounding this issue in other countries, it has been rarely discussed in China. METHODS: We reviewed the official guidelines on economic evaluations in different countries and regions and screened the literature to summarise the extent to which productivity loss was incorporated in economic evaluations and the underlying methodological challenges. RESULTS: A total of 48 guidelines from 46 countries/regions were included. Although 32 (67%) guidelines recommend excluding productivity loss in the base case analysis, 23 (48%) guidelines recommend including productivity loss in the base case or additional analyses. Through a review of systematic reviews and the economic evaluation studies included in these reviews, we found that the average probability of incorporating productivity loss in an economic evaluation was 10.2%. Among the economic evaluations (n=478) that explicitly considered productivity loss, most (n=455) considered losses from paid work, while only a few studies (n=23) considered unpaid work losses. Recognising the existing methodological challenges and the specific context of China, we proposed a practical research agenda and a disease list for progress on this topic, including the development of the disease list comprehensively consisting of health conditions where the productivity loss should be incorporated into economic evaluations. CONCLUSION: An increasing number of guidelines recommend the inclusion of productivity loss in the base case or additional analyses of economic evaluation. We optimistically expect that more Chinese researchers notice the importance of incorporating productivity loss in economic evaluations and anticipate guidelines that may be suitable for Chinese practitioners and decision-makers that facilitate the advancement of research on productivity loss measurement and valuation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9389102
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93891022022-09-06 Incorporating productivity loss in health economic evaluations: a review of guidelines and practices worldwide for research agenda in China Jiang, Shan Wang, Yitong Si, Lei Zang, Xiao Gu, Yuan-Yuan Jiang, Yawen Liu, Gordon G Wu, Jing BMJ Glob Health Original Research INTRODUCTION: Productivity loss may contribute to a large proportion of costs of health conditions in an economic evaluation from a societal perspective, but there is currently a lack of methodological consensus on how productivity loss should be measured and valued. Despite the research progress surrounding this issue in other countries, it has been rarely discussed in China. METHODS: We reviewed the official guidelines on economic evaluations in different countries and regions and screened the literature to summarise the extent to which productivity loss was incorporated in economic evaluations and the underlying methodological challenges. RESULTS: A total of 48 guidelines from 46 countries/regions were included. Although 32 (67%) guidelines recommend excluding productivity loss in the base case analysis, 23 (48%) guidelines recommend including productivity loss in the base case or additional analyses. Through a review of systematic reviews and the economic evaluation studies included in these reviews, we found that the average probability of incorporating productivity loss in an economic evaluation was 10.2%. Among the economic evaluations (n=478) that explicitly considered productivity loss, most (n=455) considered losses from paid work, while only a few studies (n=23) considered unpaid work losses. Recognising the existing methodological challenges and the specific context of China, we proposed a practical research agenda and a disease list for progress on this topic, including the development of the disease list comprehensively consisting of health conditions where the productivity loss should be incorporated into economic evaluations. CONCLUSION: An increasing number of guidelines recommend the inclusion of productivity loss in the base case or additional analyses of economic evaluation. We optimistically expect that more Chinese researchers notice the importance of incorporating productivity loss in economic evaluations and anticipate guidelines that may be suitable for Chinese practitioners and decision-makers that facilitate the advancement of research on productivity loss measurement and valuation. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9389102/ /pubmed/35977755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009777 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Jiang, Shan
Wang, Yitong
Si, Lei
Zang, Xiao
Gu, Yuan-Yuan
Jiang, Yawen
Liu, Gordon G
Wu, Jing
Incorporating productivity loss in health economic evaluations: a review of guidelines and practices worldwide for research agenda in China
title Incorporating productivity loss in health economic evaluations: a review of guidelines and practices worldwide for research agenda in China
title_full Incorporating productivity loss in health economic evaluations: a review of guidelines and practices worldwide for research agenda in China
title_fullStr Incorporating productivity loss in health economic evaluations: a review of guidelines and practices worldwide for research agenda in China
title_full_unstemmed Incorporating productivity loss in health economic evaluations: a review of guidelines and practices worldwide for research agenda in China
title_short Incorporating productivity loss in health economic evaluations: a review of guidelines and practices worldwide for research agenda in China
title_sort incorporating productivity loss in health economic evaluations: a review of guidelines and practices worldwide for research agenda in china
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9389102/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35977755
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009777
work_keys_str_mv AT jiangshan incorporatingproductivitylossinhealtheconomicevaluationsareviewofguidelinesandpracticesworldwideforresearchagendainchina
AT wangyitong incorporatingproductivitylossinhealtheconomicevaluationsareviewofguidelinesandpracticesworldwideforresearchagendainchina
AT silei incorporatingproductivitylossinhealtheconomicevaluationsareviewofguidelinesandpracticesworldwideforresearchagendainchina
AT zangxiao incorporatingproductivitylossinhealtheconomicevaluationsareviewofguidelinesandpracticesworldwideforresearchagendainchina
AT guyuanyuan incorporatingproductivitylossinhealtheconomicevaluationsareviewofguidelinesandpracticesworldwideforresearchagendainchina
AT jiangyawen incorporatingproductivitylossinhealtheconomicevaluationsareviewofguidelinesandpracticesworldwideforresearchagendainchina
AT liugordong incorporatingproductivitylossinhealtheconomicevaluationsareviewofguidelinesandpracticesworldwideforresearchagendainchina
AT wujing incorporatingproductivitylossinhealtheconomicevaluationsareviewofguidelinesandpracticesworldwideforresearchagendainchina