Cargando…

Acceptability of multiple modalities of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among female sex workers in Tanzania: a mixed-methods study

OBJECTIVES: Modalities of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV prevention offer options to women at high risk including female sex workers (FSW). This study aimed to explore FSW’s acceptability and preferences for oral pills, long-acting (LA) injectable and vaginal ring PrEP. DESIGN: Sequential,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beckham, S Wilson, Mantsios, Andrea, Galai, Noya, Likindikoki, Samuel, Mbwambo, Jessie, Davis, Wendy, Kerrigan, Deanna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9389123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35977762
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058611
_version_ 1784770370934407168
author Beckham, S Wilson
Mantsios, Andrea
Galai, Noya
Likindikoki, Samuel
Mbwambo, Jessie
Davis, Wendy
Kerrigan, Deanna
author_facet Beckham, S Wilson
Mantsios, Andrea
Galai, Noya
Likindikoki, Samuel
Mbwambo, Jessie
Davis, Wendy
Kerrigan, Deanna
author_sort Beckham, S Wilson
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Modalities of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV prevention offer options to women at high risk including female sex workers (FSW). This study aimed to explore FSW’s acceptability and preferences for oral pills, long-acting (LA) injectable and vaginal ring PrEP. DESIGN: Sequential, explanatory, mixed methods. SETTING: Iringa, Tanzania. PARTICIPANTS: FSW aged above 18 were recruited from sex work venues using time-location sampling (n=496); HIV-uninfected (n=293) were included in this analysis. Subsequently, survey participants were recruited for in-depth interviews (n=10) and two focus group discussions (n=20). PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: (1) Acceptability of PrEP (Do you personally think it would be worth it to you to take ART if it could prevent HIV?: yes/no) and (2) preference for LA injectable versus oral pills (If you personally were going to take ART to prevent HIV infection, would you prefer to take it in the form of a daily pill or an injection once every 3 months? Injection/pill). RESULTS: Participants were (92%) unaware of PrEP but 58% thought it would be worth it to personally take PrEP. Acceptability of PrEP was significantly associated with higher social cohesion (aOR 2.12; 95% CI 1.29 to 3.50) and STI symptoms in the past 6 months (aOR 2.52; 95% CI 1.38 to 4.62). Most (88%) preferred LA vs oral PrEP. Qualitative findings revealed generally positive reactions to all types of PrEP, and they were viewed as a welcome backup to condoms. Participants had concerns about pills (burden of daily use, stigma from clients), and the vaginal ring (fear of client noticing and becoming suspicious, fear of infertility) and overall preferred LA-PrEP (less frequent use, easy to hide, belief in higher efficacy). CONCLUSIONS: Offering multiple formulations of PrEP within the context of community-driven HIV prevention interventions among FSW may facilitate increased uptake and adherence. LA injectable PrEP may be a particularly preferred formulation among FSW. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02281578.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9389123
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93891232022-09-06 Acceptability of multiple modalities of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among female sex workers in Tanzania: a mixed-methods study Beckham, S Wilson Mantsios, Andrea Galai, Noya Likindikoki, Samuel Mbwambo, Jessie Davis, Wendy Kerrigan, Deanna BMJ Open HIV/AIDS OBJECTIVES: Modalities of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV prevention offer options to women at high risk including female sex workers (FSW). This study aimed to explore FSW’s acceptability and preferences for oral pills, long-acting (LA) injectable and vaginal ring PrEP. DESIGN: Sequential, explanatory, mixed methods. SETTING: Iringa, Tanzania. PARTICIPANTS: FSW aged above 18 were recruited from sex work venues using time-location sampling (n=496); HIV-uninfected (n=293) were included in this analysis. Subsequently, survey participants were recruited for in-depth interviews (n=10) and two focus group discussions (n=20). PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: (1) Acceptability of PrEP (Do you personally think it would be worth it to you to take ART if it could prevent HIV?: yes/no) and (2) preference for LA injectable versus oral pills (If you personally were going to take ART to prevent HIV infection, would you prefer to take it in the form of a daily pill or an injection once every 3 months? Injection/pill). RESULTS: Participants were (92%) unaware of PrEP but 58% thought it would be worth it to personally take PrEP. Acceptability of PrEP was significantly associated with higher social cohesion (aOR 2.12; 95% CI 1.29 to 3.50) and STI symptoms in the past 6 months (aOR 2.52; 95% CI 1.38 to 4.62). Most (88%) preferred LA vs oral PrEP. Qualitative findings revealed generally positive reactions to all types of PrEP, and they were viewed as a welcome backup to condoms. Participants had concerns about pills (burden of daily use, stigma from clients), and the vaginal ring (fear of client noticing and becoming suspicious, fear of infertility) and overall preferred LA-PrEP (less frequent use, easy to hide, belief in higher efficacy). CONCLUSIONS: Offering multiple formulations of PrEP within the context of community-driven HIV prevention interventions among FSW may facilitate increased uptake and adherence. LA injectable PrEP may be a particularly preferred formulation among FSW. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02281578. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9389123/ /pubmed/35977762 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058611 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle HIV/AIDS
Beckham, S Wilson
Mantsios, Andrea
Galai, Noya
Likindikoki, Samuel
Mbwambo, Jessie
Davis, Wendy
Kerrigan, Deanna
Acceptability of multiple modalities of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among female sex workers in Tanzania: a mixed-methods study
title Acceptability of multiple modalities of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among female sex workers in Tanzania: a mixed-methods study
title_full Acceptability of multiple modalities of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among female sex workers in Tanzania: a mixed-methods study
title_fullStr Acceptability of multiple modalities of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among female sex workers in Tanzania: a mixed-methods study
title_full_unstemmed Acceptability of multiple modalities of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among female sex workers in Tanzania: a mixed-methods study
title_short Acceptability of multiple modalities of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among female sex workers in Tanzania: a mixed-methods study
title_sort acceptability of multiple modalities of pre-exposure prophylaxis (prep) among female sex workers in tanzania: a mixed-methods study
topic HIV/AIDS
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9389123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35977762
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058611
work_keys_str_mv AT beckhamswilson acceptabilityofmultiplemodalitiesofpreexposureprophylaxisprepamongfemalesexworkersintanzaniaamixedmethodsstudy
AT mantsiosandrea acceptabilityofmultiplemodalitiesofpreexposureprophylaxisprepamongfemalesexworkersintanzaniaamixedmethodsstudy
AT galainoya acceptabilityofmultiplemodalitiesofpreexposureprophylaxisprepamongfemalesexworkersintanzaniaamixedmethodsstudy
AT likindikokisamuel acceptabilityofmultiplemodalitiesofpreexposureprophylaxisprepamongfemalesexworkersintanzaniaamixedmethodsstudy
AT mbwambojessie acceptabilityofmultiplemodalitiesofpreexposureprophylaxisprepamongfemalesexworkersintanzaniaamixedmethodsstudy
AT daviswendy acceptabilityofmultiplemodalitiesofpreexposureprophylaxisprepamongfemalesexworkersintanzaniaamixedmethodsstudy
AT kerrigandeanna acceptabilityofmultiplemodalitiesofpreexposureprophylaxisprepamongfemalesexworkersintanzaniaamixedmethodsstudy