Cargando…
Diagnostic accuracy of Raman spectroscopy in oral squamous cell carcinoma
BACKGROUND: Raman spectroscopy (RS) has shown great potential in the diagnosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Although many single-central original studies have been carried out, it is difficult to use RS in real clinical settings based on the current limited evidence. Herein, we conducted...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9389172/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35992884 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.925032 |
_version_ | 1784770382591426560 |
---|---|
author | Han, Ruiying Lin, Nan Huang, Juan Ma, Xuelei |
author_facet | Han, Ruiying Lin, Nan Huang, Juan Ma, Xuelei |
author_sort | Han, Ruiying |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Raman spectroscopy (RS) has shown great potential in the diagnosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Although many single-central original studies have been carried out, it is difficult to use RS in real clinical settings based on the current limited evidence. Herein, we conducted this meta-analysis of diagnostic studies to evaluate the overall performance of RS in OSCC diagnosis. METHODS: We systematically searched databases including Medline, Embase, and Web of Science for studies from January 2000 to March 2022. Data of true positives, true negatives, false positives, and false negatives were extracted from the included studies to calculate the pooled sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative likelihood ratios (LRs), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) with 95% confidence intervals, then we plotted the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve and the area under the curve (AUC) to evaluate the overall performance of RS. Quality assessments and publication bias were evaluated by Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) checklist in Review Manager 5.3. The statistical parameters were calculated with StataSE version 12 and MetaDiSc 1.4. RESULTS: In total, 13 studies were included in our meta-analysis. The pooled diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of RS in OSCC were 0.89 (95% CI, 0.85–0.92) and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.78–0.89). The AUC of SROC curve was 0.93 (95% CI, 0.91–0.95). CONCLUSIONS: RS is a non-invasive diagnostic technology with high specificity and sensitivity for detecting OSCC and has the potential to be applied clinically. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9389172 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93891722022-08-20 Diagnostic accuracy of Raman spectroscopy in oral squamous cell carcinoma Han, Ruiying Lin, Nan Huang, Juan Ma, Xuelei Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: Raman spectroscopy (RS) has shown great potential in the diagnosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Although many single-central original studies have been carried out, it is difficult to use RS in real clinical settings based on the current limited evidence. Herein, we conducted this meta-analysis of diagnostic studies to evaluate the overall performance of RS in OSCC diagnosis. METHODS: We systematically searched databases including Medline, Embase, and Web of Science for studies from January 2000 to March 2022. Data of true positives, true negatives, false positives, and false negatives were extracted from the included studies to calculate the pooled sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative likelihood ratios (LRs), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) with 95% confidence intervals, then we plotted the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve and the area under the curve (AUC) to evaluate the overall performance of RS. Quality assessments and publication bias were evaluated by Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) checklist in Review Manager 5.3. The statistical parameters were calculated with StataSE version 12 and MetaDiSc 1.4. RESULTS: In total, 13 studies were included in our meta-analysis. The pooled diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of RS in OSCC were 0.89 (95% CI, 0.85–0.92) and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.78–0.89). The AUC of SROC curve was 0.93 (95% CI, 0.91–0.95). CONCLUSIONS: RS is a non-invasive diagnostic technology with high specificity and sensitivity for detecting OSCC and has the potential to be applied clinically. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9389172/ /pubmed/35992884 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.925032 Text en Copyright © 2022 Han, Lin, Huang and Ma https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Han, Ruiying Lin, Nan Huang, Juan Ma, Xuelei Diagnostic accuracy of Raman spectroscopy in oral squamous cell carcinoma |
title | Diagnostic accuracy of Raman spectroscopy in oral squamous cell carcinoma |
title_full | Diagnostic accuracy of Raman spectroscopy in oral squamous cell carcinoma |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic accuracy of Raman spectroscopy in oral squamous cell carcinoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic accuracy of Raman spectroscopy in oral squamous cell carcinoma |
title_short | Diagnostic accuracy of Raman spectroscopy in oral squamous cell carcinoma |
title_sort | diagnostic accuracy of raman spectroscopy in oral squamous cell carcinoma |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9389172/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35992884 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.925032 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hanruiying diagnosticaccuracyoframanspectroscopyinoralsquamouscellcarcinoma AT linnan diagnosticaccuracyoframanspectroscopyinoralsquamouscellcarcinoma AT huangjuan diagnosticaccuracyoframanspectroscopyinoralsquamouscellcarcinoma AT maxuelei diagnosticaccuracyoframanspectroscopyinoralsquamouscellcarcinoma |