Cargando…

Physical habitat in conterminous US streams and Rivers, part 2: A quantitative assessment of habitat condition

Rigorous assessments of the ecological condition of water resources and the effect of human activities on those waters require quantitative physical, chemical, and biological data. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s river and stream surveys quantify river and stream bed particle size and sta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaufmann, Philip R., Hughes, Robert M., Paulsen, Steven G., Peck, David V., Seeliger, Curt W., Kincaid, Tom, Mitchell, Richard M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9389467/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35991318
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109047
_version_ 1784770451739770880
author Kaufmann, Philip R.
Hughes, Robert M.
Paulsen, Steven G.
Peck, David V.
Seeliger, Curt W.
Kincaid, Tom
Mitchell, Richard M.
author_facet Kaufmann, Philip R.
Hughes, Robert M.
Paulsen, Steven G.
Peck, David V.
Seeliger, Curt W.
Kincaid, Tom
Mitchell, Richard M.
author_sort Kaufmann, Philip R.
collection PubMed
description Rigorous assessments of the ecological condition of water resources and the effect of human activities on those waters require quantitative physical, chemical, and biological data. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s river and stream surveys quantify river and stream bed particle size and stability, instream habitat complexity and cover, riparian vegetation cover and structure, and anthropogenic disturbance activities. Physical habitat is strongly controlled by natural geoclimatic factors that co-vary with human activities. We expressed the anthropogenic alteration of physical habitat as O/E ratios of observed habitat metric values divided by values expected under least-disturbed reference conditions, where site-specific expected values vary given their geoclimatic and geomorphic context. We set criteria for good, fair, and poor condition based on the distribution of O/E values in regional least-disturbed reference sites. Poor conditions existed in 22–24% of the 1.2 million km of streams and rivers in the conterminous U.S. for riparian human disturbance, streambed sediment and riparian vegetation cover, versus 14% for instream habitat complexity. Based on the same four indicators, the percentage of stream length in poor condition within 9 separate U.S. ecoregions ranged from 4% to 42%. Associations of our physical habitat indices with anthropogenic pressures demonstrate the scope of anthropogenic habitat alteration; habitat condition was negatively related to the level of anthropogenic disturbance nationally and in nearly all ecoregions. Relative risk estimates showed that streams and rivers with poor sediment, riparian cover complexity, or instream habitat cover conditions were 1.4 to 2.6 times as likely to also have fish or macroinvertebrate assemblages in poor condition. Our physical habitat condition indicators help explain deviations in biological conditions from those observed among least-disturbed sites and inform management actions for rehabilitating impaired waters and mitigating further ecological degradation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9389467
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93894672023-08-01 Physical habitat in conterminous US streams and Rivers, part 2: A quantitative assessment of habitat condition Kaufmann, Philip R. Hughes, Robert M. Paulsen, Steven G. Peck, David V. Seeliger, Curt W. Kincaid, Tom Mitchell, Richard M. Ecol Indic Article Rigorous assessments of the ecological condition of water resources and the effect of human activities on those waters require quantitative physical, chemical, and biological data. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s river and stream surveys quantify river and stream bed particle size and stability, instream habitat complexity and cover, riparian vegetation cover and structure, and anthropogenic disturbance activities. Physical habitat is strongly controlled by natural geoclimatic factors that co-vary with human activities. We expressed the anthropogenic alteration of physical habitat as O/E ratios of observed habitat metric values divided by values expected under least-disturbed reference conditions, where site-specific expected values vary given their geoclimatic and geomorphic context. We set criteria for good, fair, and poor condition based on the distribution of O/E values in regional least-disturbed reference sites. Poor conditions existed in 22–24% of the 1.2 million km of streams and rivers in the conterminous U.S. for riparian human disturbance, streambed sediment and riparian vegetation cover, versus 14% for instream habitat complexity. Based on the same four indicators, the percentage of stream length in poor condition within 9 separate U.S. ecoregions ranged from 4% to 42%. Associations of our physical habitat indices with anthropogenic pressures demonstrate the scope of anthropogenic habitat alteration; habitat condition was negatively related to the level of anthropogenic disturbance nationally and in nearly all ecoregions. Relative risk estimates showed that streams and rivers with poor sediment, riparian cover complexity, or instream habitat cover conditions were 1.4 to 2.6 times as likely to also have fish or macroinvertebrate assemblages in poor condition. Our physical habitat condition indicators help explain deviations in biological conditions from those observed among least-disturbed sites and inform management actions for rehabilitating impaired waters and mitigating further ecological degradation. 2022-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9389467/ /pubmed/35991318 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109047 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Article
Kaufmann, Philip R.
Hughes, Robert M.
Paulsen, Steven G.
Peck, David V.
Seeliger, Curt W.
Kincaid, Tom
Mitchell, Richard M.
Physical habitat in conterminous US streams and Rivers, part 2: A quantitative assessment of habitat condition
title Physical habitat in conterminous US streams and Rivers, part 2: A quantitative assessment of habitat condition
title_full Physical habitat in conterminous US streams and Rivers, part 2: A quantitative assessment of habitat condition
title_fullStr Physical habitat in conterminous US streams and Rivers, part 2: A quantitative assessment of habitat condition
title_full_unstemmed Physical habitat in conterminous US streams and Rivers, part 2: A quantitative assessment of habitat condition
title_short Physical habitat in conterminous US streams and Rivers, part 2: A quantitative assessment of habitat condition
title_sort physical habitat in conterminous us streams and rivers, part 2: a quantitative assessment of habitat condition
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9389467/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35991318
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109047
work_keys_str_mv AT kaufmannphilipr physicalhabitatinconterminoususstreamsandriverspart2aquantitativeassessmentofhabitatcondition
AT hughesrobertm physicalhabitatinconterminoususstreamsandriverspart2aquantitativeassessmentofhabitatcondition
AT paulsensteveng physicalhabitatinconterminoususstreamsandriverspart2aquantitativeassessmentofhabitatcondition
AT peckdavidv physicalhabitatinconterminoususstreamsandriverspart2aquantitativeassessmentofhabitatcondition
AT seeligercurtw physicalhabitatinconterminoususstreamsandriverspart2aquantitativeassessmentofhabitatcondition
AT kincaidtom physicalhabitatinconterminoususstreamsandriverspart2aquantitativeassessmentofhabitatcondition
AT mitchellrichardm physicalhabitatinconterminoususstreamsandriverspart2aquantitativeassessmentofhabitatcondition