Cargando…

Preoperative computed tomography-guided localization for multiple pulmonary nodules: comparison of methylene blue and coil

BACKGROUND: Preoperative computed tomography (CT)-guided localization has been used to guide the video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) sublobar (wedge or segmental) resection for pulmonary nodules (PNs). We aimed to assess the relative efficacy and safety of CT-guided methylene blue (MB)- and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Sheng-Feng, Liu, Hai-Ri, Ma, Ai-Li, Li, Er-Liang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9389799/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35986299
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-022-01941-4
_version_ 1784770535026065408
author Zhang, Sheng-Feng
Liu, Hai-Ri
Ma, Ai-Li
Li, Er-Liang
author_facet Zhang, Sheng-Feng
Liu, Hai-Ri
Ma, Ai-Li
Li, Er-Liang
author_sort Zhang, Sheng-Feng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Preoperative computed tomography (CT)-guided localization has been used to guide the video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) sublobar (wedge or segmental) resection for pulmonary nodules (PNs). We aimed to assess the relative efficacy and safety of CT-guided methylene blue (MB)- and coil-based approaches to the preoperative localization of multiple PNs (MPNs). METHODS: Between January 2015 and December 2020, 31 total cases suffering from MPNs at our hospital underwent CT-guided localization and subsequent VATS resection in our hospital, of whom 15 and 16 respectively underwent MB localization (MBL) and coil localization (CL). The clinical effectiveness and complication rates were compared between 2 groups. RESULTS: The PN- and patient-based technical success rates in the MBL group were both 100%, whereas in the CL group they were 97.2% (35/36) and 93.8% (15/16), respectively, with no substantial discrepancies between groups. Patients in the MBL group illustrated a substantially shorter CT-guided localization duration compared with the CL group (18 min vs. 29.5 min, P < 0.001). Pneumothorax rates (P = 1.000) and lung hemorrhage (P = 1.000) were comparable in both groups. In the MBL and CL groups, the median interval between localization and VATS was 1 h and 15.5 h, respectively (P < 0.001). One-stage VATS sublobar resection of the target nodules was successfully performed in all patients from both groups. CONCLUSION: Both CT-guided MBL and CL can be readily and safely utilized for preoperative localization in individuals who had MPNs, with MBL being correlated with a shorter localization duration compared with CL.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9389799
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93897992022-08-20 Preoperative computed tomography-guided localization for multiple pulmonary nodules: comparison of methylene blue and coil Zhang, Sheng-Feng Liu, Hai-Ri Ma, Ai-Li Li, Er-Liang J Cardiothorac Surg Research BACKGROUND: Preoperative computed tomography (CT)-guided localization has been used to guide the video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) sublobar (wedge or segmental) resection for pulmonary nodules (PNs). We aimed to assess the relative efficacy and safety of CT-guided methylene blue (MB)- and coil-based approaches to the preoperative localization of multiple PNs (MPNs). METHODS: Between January 2015 and December 2020, 31 total cases suffering from MPNs at our hospital underwent CT-guided localization and subsequent VATS resection in our hospital, of whom 15 and 16 respectively underwent MB localization (MBL) and coil localization (CL). The clinical effectiveness and complication rates were compared between 2 groups. RESULTS: The PN- and patient-based technical success rates in the MBL group were both 100%, whereas in the CL group they were 97.2% (35/36) and 93.8% (15/16), respectively, with no substantial discrepancies between groups. Patients in the MBL group illustrated a substantially shorter CT-guided localization duration compared with the CL group (18 min vs. 29.5 min, P < 0.001). Pneumothorax rates (P = 1.000) and lung hemorrhage (P = 1.000) were comparable in both groups. In the MBL and CL groups, the median interval between localization and VATS was 1 h and 15.5 h, respectively (P < 0.001). One-stage VATS sublobar resection of the target nodules was successfully performed in all patients from both groups. CONCLUSION: Both CT-guided MBL and CL can be readily and safely utilized for preoperative localization in individuals who had MPNs, with MBL being correlated with a shorter localization duration compared with CL. BioMed Central 2022-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9389799/ /pubmed/35986299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-022-01941-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Zhang, Sheng-Feng
Liu, Hai-Ri
Ma, Ai-Li
Li, Er-Liang
Preoperative computed tomography-guided localization for multiple pulmonary nodules: comparison of methylene blue and coil
title Preoperative computed tomography-guided localization for multiple pulmonary nodules: comparison of methylene blue and coil
title_full Preoperative computed tomography-guided localization for multiple pulmonary nodules: comparison of methylene blue and coil
title_fullStr Preoperative computed tomography-guided localization for multiple pulmonary nodules: comparison of methylene blue and coil
title_full_unstemmed Preoperative computed tomography-guided localization for multiple pulmonary nodules: comparison of methylene blue and coil
title_short Preoperative computed tomography-guided localization for multiple pulmonary nodules: comparison of methylene blue and coil
title_sort preoperative computed tomography-guided localization for multiple pulmonary nodules: comparison of methylene blue and coil
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9389799/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35986299
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-022-01941-4
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangshengfeng preoperativecomputedtomographyguidedlocalizationformultiplepulmonarynodulescomparisonofmethyleneblueandcoil
AT liuhairi preoperativecomputedtomographyguidedlocalizationformultiplepulmonarynodulescomparisonofmethyleneblueandcoil
AT maaili preoperativecomputedtomographyguidedlocalizationformultiplepulmonarynodulescomparisonofmethyleneblueandcoil
AT lierliang preoperativecomputedtomographyguidedlocalizationformultiplepulmonarynodulescomparisonofmethyleneblueandcoil