Cargando…

A randomized double blind comparison of atosiban in patients with recurrent implantation failure undergoing IVF treatment

BACKGROUND: Patients with recurrent implantation failure (RIF) may have more uterine contractions. Several observational studies suggested that atosiban administration around embryo transfer resulted in higher pregnancy rates in RIF patients. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of atosiban given...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tang, Chuan Ling, Li, Qi Yue, Chen, Feng Lian, Cai, Chen Ting, Dong, Yue Yan, Wu, Yuan Yuan, Yang, Jian Zhi, Zhao, Mei, Chi, Feng Li, Hong, Ling, Ai, Ai, Chen, Miao Xin, Li, Kun Ming, Teng, Xiao Ming, Chen, Zhi Qin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9389813/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35986323
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-022-00999-y
_version_ 1784770538239950848
author Tang, Chuan Ling
Li, Qi Yue
Chen, Feng Lian
Cai, Chen Ting
Dong, Yue Yan
Wu, Yuan Yuan
Yang, Jian Zhi
Zhao, Mei
Chi, Feng Li
Hong, Ling
Ai, Ai
Chen, Miao Xin
Li, Kun Ming
Teng, Xiao Ming
Chen, Zhi Qin
author_facet Tang, Chuan Ling
Li, Qi Yue
Chen, Feng Lian
Cai, Chen Ting
Dong, Yue Yan
Wu, Yuan Yuan
Yang, Jian Zhi
Zhao, Mei
Chi, Feng Li
Hong, Ling
Ai, Ai
Chen, Miao Xin
Li, Kun Ming
Teng, Xiao Ming
Chen, Zhi Qin
author_sort Tang, Chuan Ling
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patients with recurrent implantation failure (RIF) may have more uterine contractions. Several observational studies suggested that atosiban administration around embryo transfer resulted in higher pregnancy rates in RIF patients. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of atosiban given before fresh embryo transfer on pregnancy outcomes of women with RIF. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled clinical trial was performed in IVF center of Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital. According to a computer-generated randomization list, 194 infertile women with RIF received fresh embryo transfer between July 2017 and December 2019 were randomly allocated into the atosiban (n = 97) and the placebo (n = 97) groups. Women in the treatment group received atosiban intravenously about 30 min before embryo transfer with a bolus dose of 6.75 mg over one minute. Those in the placebo group received only normal saline infusion for the same duration. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the live birth rate between the atosiban and placebo groups (42.3% vs 35.1%, P = 0.302, RR = 1.206 (0.844–1.723)). No significant differences were found between the two groups in the positive pregnancy test, clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, miscarriage, multiple pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy and implantation rates. Similar results were found when stratified by the number of embryos previously transferred, number of previous failed embryo transfers, frequency of endometrial peristalsis on embryo transfer day (≥ 3 waves/min) or serum estradiol (E(2)) on the day of hCG above the median level. And, there was no correlation between the serum E(2) level on the day of hCG and the frequency of endometrial peristalsis on embryo transfer day. The frequency of endometrial peristalsis on embryo transfer day, total FSH/HMG dosage and duration were the significant factors which independently predicted the likelihood of a live birth. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggested that atosiban treatment before fresh embryo transfer might not improve the live birth rate in RIF patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study had been approved by the Institutional Review Board of the hospital (2017 ethics No.43) and was registered under Clinicaltrials.gov with an identifier NCT02893722.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9389813
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93898132022-08-20 A randomized double blind comparison of atosiban in patients with recurrent implantation failure undergoing IVF treatment Tang, Chuan Ling Li, Qi Yue Chen, Feng Lian Cai, Chen Ting Dong, Yue Yan Wu, Yuan Yuan Yang, Jian Zhi Zhao, Mei Chi, Feng Li Hong, Ling Ai, Ai Chen, Miao Xin Li, Kun Ming Teng, Xiao Ming Chen, Zhi Qin Reprod Biol Endocrinol Research BACKGROUND: Patients with recurrent implantation failure (RIF) may have more uterine contractions. Several observational studies suggested that atosiban administration around embryo transfer resulted in higher pregnancy rates in RIF patients. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of atosiban given before fresh embryo transfer on pregnancy outcomes of women with RIF. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled clinical trial was performed in IVF center of Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital. According to a computer-generated randomization list, 194 infertile women with RIF received fresh embryo transfer between July 2017 and December 2019 were randomly allocated into the atosiban (n = 97) and the placebo (n = 97) groups. Women in the treatment group received atosiban intravenously about 30 min before embryo transfer with a bolus dose of 6.75 mg over one minute. Those in the placebo group received only normal saline infusion for the same duration. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the live birth rate between the atosiban and placebo groups (42.3% vs 35.1%, P = 0.302, RR = 1.206 (0.844–1.723)). No significant differences were found between the two groups in the positive pregnancy test, clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, miscarriage, multiple pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy and implantation rates. Similar results were found when stratified by the number of embryos previously transferred, number of previous failed embryo transfers, frequency of endometrial peristalsis on embryo transfer day (≥ 3 waves/min) or serum estradiol (E(2)) on the day of hCG above the median level. And, there was no correlation between the serum E(2) level on the day of hCG and the frequency of endometrial peristalsis on embryo transfer day. The frequency of endometrial peristalsis on embryo transfer day, total FSH/HMG dosage and duration were the significant factors which independently predicted the likelihood of a live birth. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggested that atosiban treatment before fresh embryo transfer might not improve the live birth rate in RIF patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study had been approved by the Institutional Review Board of the hospital (2017 ethics No.43) and was registered under Clinicaltrials.gov with an identifier NCT02893722. BioMed Central 2022-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9389813/ /pubmed/35986323 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-022-00999-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Tang, Chuan Ling
Li, Qi Yue
Chen, Feng Lian
Cai, Chen Ting
Dong, Yue Yan
Wu, Yuan Yuan
Yang, Jian Zhi
Zhao, Mei
Chi, Feng Li
Hong, Ling
Ai, Ai
Chen, Miao Xin
Li, Kun Ming
Teng, Xiao Ming
Chen, Zhi Qin
A randomized double blind comparison of atosiban in patients with recurrent implantation failure undergoing IVF treatment
title A randomized double blind comparison of atosiban in patients with recurrent implantation failure undergoing IVF treatment
title_full A randomized double blind comparison of atosiban in patients with recurrent implantation failure undergoing IVF treatment
title_fullStr A randomized double blind comparison of atosiban in patients with recurrent implantation failure undergoing IVF treatment
title_full_unstemmed A randomized double blind comparison of atosiban in patients with recurrent implantation failure undergoing IVF treatment
title_short A randomized double blind comparison of atosiban in patients with recurrent implantation failure undergoing IVF treatment
title_sort randomized double blind comparison of atosiban in patients with recurrent implantation failure undergoing ivf treatment
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9389813/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35986323
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-022-00999-y
work_keys_str_mv AT tangchuanling arandomizeddoubleblindcomparisonofatosibaninpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureundergoingivftreatment
AT liqiyue arandomizeddoubleblindcomparisonofatosibaninpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureundergoingivftreatment
AT chenfenglian arandomizeddoubleblindcomparisonofatosibaninpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureundergoingivftreatment
AT caichenting arandomizeddoubleblindcomparisonofatosibaninpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureundergoingivftreatment
AT dongyueyan arandomizeddoubleblindcomparisonofatosibaninpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureundergoingivftreatment
AT wuyuanyuan arandomizeddoubleblindcomparisonofatosibaninpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureundergoingivftreatment
AT yangjianzhi arandomizeddoubleblindcomparisonofatosibaninpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureundergoingivftreatment
AT zhaomei arandomizeddoubleblindcomparisonofatosibaninpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureundergoingivftreatment
AT chifengli arandomizeddoubleblindcomparisonofatosibaninpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureundergoingivftreatment
AT hongling arandomizeddoubleblindcomparisonofatosibaninpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureundergoingivftreatment
AT aiai arandomizeddoubleblindcomparisonofatosibaninpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureundergoingivftreatment
AT chenmiaoxin arandomizeddoubleblindcomparisonofatosibaninpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureundergoingivftreatment
AT likunming arandomizeddoubleblindcomparisonofatosibaninpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureundergoingivftreatment
AT tengxiaoming arandomizeddoubleblindcomparisonofatosibaninpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureundergoingivftreatment
AT chenzhiqin arandomizeddoubleblindcomparisonofatosibaninpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureundergoingivftreatment
AT tangchuanling randomizeddoubleblindcomparisonofatosibaninpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureundergoingivftreatment
AT liqiyue randomizeddoubleblindcomparisonofatosibaninpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureundergoingivftreatment
AT chenfenglian randomizeddoubleblindcomparisonofatosibaninpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureundergoingivftreatment
AT caichenting randomizeddoubleblindcomparisonofatosibaninpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureundergoingivftreatment
AT dongyueyan randomizeddoubleblindcomparisonofatosibaninpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureundergoingivftreatment
AT wuyuanyuan randomizeddoubleblindcomparisonofatosibaninpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureundergoingivftreatment
AT yangjianzhi randomizeddoubleblindcomparisonofatosibaninpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureundergoingivftreatment
AT zhaomei randomizeddoubleblindcomparisonofatosibaninpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureundergoingivftreatment
AT chifengli randomizeddoubleblindcomparisonofatosibaninpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureundergoingivftreatment
AT hongling randomizeddoubleblindcomparisonofatosibaninpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureundergoingivftreatment
AT aiai randomizeddoubleblindcomparisonofatosibaninpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureundergoingivftreatment
AT chenmiaoxin randomizeddoubleblindcomparisonofatosibaninpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureundergoingivftreatment
AT likunming randomizeddoubleblindcomparisonofatosibaninpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureundergoingivftreatment
AT tengxiaoming randomizeddoubleblindcomparisonofatosibaninpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureundergoingivftreatment
AT chenzhiqin randomizeddoubleblindcomparisonofatosibaninpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureundergoingivftreatment