Cargando…
A randomized double blind comparison of atosiban in patients with recurrent implantation failure undergoing IVF treatment
BACKGROUND: Patients with recurrent implantation failure (RIF) may have more uterine contractions. Several observational studies suggested that atosiban administration around embryo transfer resulted in higher pregnancy rates in RIF patients. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of atosiban given...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9389813/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35986323 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-022-00999-y |
_version_ | 1784770538239950848 |
---|---|
author | Tang, Chuan Ling Li, Qi Yue Chen, Feng Lian Cai, Chen Ting Dong, Yue Yan Wu, Yuan Yuan Yang, Jian Zhi Zhao, Mei Chi, Feng Li Hong, Ling Ai, Ai Chen, Miao Xin Li, Kun Ming Teng, Xiao Ming Chen, Zhi Qin |
author_facet | Tang, Chuan Ling Li, Qi Yue Chen, Feng Lian Cai, Chen Ting Dong, Yue Yan Wu, Yuan Yuan Yang, Jian Zhi Zhao, Mei Chi, Feng Li Hong, Ling Ai, Ai Chen, Miao Xin Li, Kun Ming Teng, Xiao Ming Chen, Zhi Qin |
author_sort | Tang, Chuan Ling |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Patients with recurrent implantation failure (RIF) may have more uterine contractions. Several observational studies suggested that atosiban administration around embryo transfer resulted in higher pregnancy rates in RIF patients. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of atosiban given before fresh embryo transfer on pregnancy outcomes of women with RIF. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled clinical trial was performed in IVF center of Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital. According to a computer-generated randomization list, 194 infertile women with RIF received fresh embryo transfer between July 2017 and December 2019 were randomly allocated into the atosiban (n = 97) and the placebo (n = 97) groups. Women in the treatment group received atosiban intravenously about 30 min before embryo transfer with a bolus dose of 6.75 mg over one minute. Those in the placebo group received only normal saline infusion for the same duration. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the live birth rate between the atosiban and placebo groups (42.3% vs 35.1%, P = 0.302, RR = 1.206 (0.844–1.723)). No significant differences were found between the two groups in the positive pregnancy test, clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, miscarriage, multiple pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy and implantation rates. Similar results were found when stratified by the number of embryos previously transferred, number of previous failed embryo transfers, frequency of endometrial peristalsis on embryo transfer day (≥ 3 waves/min) or serum estradiol (E(2)) on the day of hCG above the median level. And, there was no correlation between the serum E(2) level on the day of hCG and the frequency of endometrial peristalsis on embryo transfer day. The frequency of endometrial peristalsis on embryo transfer day, total FSH/HMG dosage and duration were the significant factors which independently predicted the likelihood of a live birth. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggested that atosiban treatment before fresh embryo transfer might not improve the live birth rate in RIF patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study had been approved by the Institutional Review Board of the hospital (2017 ethics No.43) and was registered under Clinicaltrials.gov with an identifier NCT02893722. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9389813 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93898132022-08-20 A randomized double blind comparison of atosiban in patients with recurrent implantation failure undergoing IVF treatment Tang, Chuan Ling Li, Qi Yue Chen, Feng Lian Cai, Chen Ting Dong, Yue Yan Wu, Yuan Yuan Yang, Jian Zhi Zhao, Mei Chi, Feng Li Hong, Ling Ai, Ai Chen, Miao Xin Li, Kun Ming Teng, Xiao Ming Chen, Zhi Qin Reprod Biol Endocrinol Research BACKGROUND: Patients with recurrent implantation failure (RIF) may have more uterine contractions. Several observational studies suggested that atosiban administration around embryo transfer resulted in higher pregnancy rates in RIF patients. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of atosiban given before fresh embryo transfer on pregnancy outcomes of women with RIF. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled clinical trial was performed in IVF center of Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital. According to a computer-generated randomization list, 194 infertile women with RIF received fresh embryo transfer between July 2017 and December 2019 were randomly allocated into the atosiban (n = 97) and the placebo (n = 97) groups. Women in the treatment group received atosiban intravenously about 30 min before embryo transfer with a bolus dose of 6.75 mg over one minute. Those in the placebo group received only normal saline infusion for the same duration. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the live birth rate between the atosiban and placebo groups (42.3% vs 35.1%, P = 0.302, RR = 1.206 (0.844–1.723)). No significant differences were found between the two groups in the positive pregnancy test, clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, miscarriage, multiple pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy and implantation rates. Similar results were found when stratified by the number of embryos previously transferred, number of previous failed embryo transfers, frequency of endometrial peristalsis on embryo transfer day (≥ 3 waves/min) or serum estradiol (E(2)) on the day of hCG above the median level. And, there was no correlation between the serum E(2) level on the day of hCG and the frequency of endometrial peristalsis on embryo transfer day. The frequency of endometrial peristalsis on embryo transfer day, total FSH/HMG dosage and duration were the significant factors which independently predicted the likelihood of a live birth. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggested that atosiban treatment before fresh embryo transfer might not improve the live birth rate in RIF patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study had been approved by the Institutional Review Board of the hospital (2017 ethics No.43) and was registered under Clinicaltrials.gov with an identifier NCT02893722. BioMed Central 2022-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9389813/ /pubmed/35986323 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-022-00999-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Tang, Chuan Ling Li, Qi Yue Chen, Feng Lian Cai, Chen Ting Dong, Yue Yan Wu, Yuan Yuan Yang, Jian Zhi Zhao, Mei Chi, Feng Li Hong, Ling Ai, Ai Chen, Miao Xin Li, Kun Ming Teng, Xiao Ming Chen, Zhi Qin A randomized double blind comparison of atosiban in patients with recurrent implantation failure undergoing IVF treatment |
title | A randomized double blind comparison of atosiban in patients with recurrent implantation failure undergoing IVF treatment |
title_full | A randomized double blind comparison of atosiban in patients with recurrent implantation failure undergoing IVF treatment |
title_fullStr | A randomized double blind comparison of atosiban in patients with recurrent implantation failure undergoing IVF treatment |
title_full_unstemmed | A randomized double blind comparison of atosiban in patients with recurrent implantation failure undergoing IVF treatment |
title_short | A randomized double blind comparison of atosiban in patients with recurrent implantation failure undergoing IVF treatment |
title_sort | randomized double blind comparison of atosiban in patients with recurrent implantation failure undergoing ivf treatment |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9389813/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35986323 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-022-00999-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tangchuanling arandomizeddoubleblindcomparisonofatosibaninpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureundergoingivftreatment AT liqiyue arandomizeddoubleblindcomparisonofatosibaninpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureundergoingivftreatment AT chenfenglian arandomizeddoubleblindcomparisonofatosibaninpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureundergoingivftreatment AT caichenting arandomizeddoubleblindcomparisonofatosibaninpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureundergoingivftreatment AT dongyueyan arandomizeddoubleblindcomparisonofatosibaninpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureundergoingivftreatment AT wuyuanyuan arandomizeddoubleblindcomparisonofatosibaninpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureundergoingivftreatment AT yangjianzhi arandomizeddoubleblindcomparisonofatosibaninpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureundergoingivftreatment AT zhaomei arandomizeddoubleblindcomparisonofatosibaninpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureundergoingivftreatment AT chifengli arandomizeddoubleblindcomparisonofatosibaninpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureundergoingivftreatment AT hongling arandomizeddoubleblindcomparisonofatosibaninpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureundergoingivftreatment AT aiai arandomizeddoubleblindcomparisonofatosibaninpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureundergoingivftreatment AT chenmiaoxin arandomizeddoubleblindcomparisonofatosibaninpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureundergoingivftreatment AT likunming arandomizeddoubleblindcomparisonofatosibaninpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureundergoingivftreatment AT tengxiaoming arandomizeddoubleblindcomparisonofatosibaninpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureundergoingivftreatment AT chenzhiqin arandomizeddoubleblindcomparisonofatosibaninpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureundergoingivftreatment AT tangchuanling randomizeddoubleblindcomparisonofatosibaninpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureundergoingivftreatment AT liqiyue randomizeddoubleblindcomparisonofatosibaninpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureundergoingivftreatment AT chenfenglian randomizeddoubleblindcomparisonofatosibaninpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureundergoingivftreatment AT caichenting randomizeddoubleblindcomparisonofatosibaninpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureundergoingivftreatment AT dongyueyan randomizeddoubleblindcomparisonofatosibaninpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureundergoingivftreatment AT wuyuanyuan randomizeddoubleblindcomparisonofatosibaninpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureundergoingivftreatment AT yangjianzhi randomizeddoubleblindcomparisonofatosibaninpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureundergoingivftreatment AT zhaomei randomizeddoubleblindcomparisonofatosibaninpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureundergoingivftreatment AT chifengli randomizeddoubleblindcomparisonofatosibaninpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureundergoingivftreatment AT hongling randomizeddoubleblindcomparisonofatosibaninpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureundergoingivftreatment AT aiai randomizeddoubleblindcomparisonofatosibaninpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureundergoingivftreatment AT chenmiaoxin randomizeddoubleblindcomparisonofatosibaninpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureundergoingivftreatment AT likunming randomizeddoubleblindcomparisonofatosibaninpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureundergoingivftreatment AT tengxiaoming randomizeddoubleblindcomparisonofatosibaninpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureundergoingivftreatment AT chenzhiqin randomizeddoubleblindcomparisonofatosibaninpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureundergoingivftreatment |