Dimensions of Proximity: An Actionable Framework to Better Understand Integrated Practices in Cancer Networks

INTRODUCTION: This study empirically explores how dimensions of proximity that support integrated care emerge from deliberate actions within a cancer network in Quebec (Canada). METHODS: We conduct a supplementary analysis of qualitative data from a primary multi-case study focused on collaborative governance and cancer care integration. Data from semi-structured interviews, documents and observation are analysed to find out how relationships take shape through actions that create different dimensions of proximity, and how these contribute to integrated practices. RESULTS: Deliberate actions at different levels within the network create dimensions of proximity. The creation of committees and communities of practice at national and local level establish geographic proximity. Relational proximity among actors emerges to different degrees in these venues. Cognitive proximity is generated by consistent promotion of the national cancer plan and person-centred care. The priority of cancer care at policy level and prescription of common standards enhance organizational proximity. Synergy between dimensions of proximity appears essential to the emergence of integrated practices. Insufficient efforts to create technological and institutional proximity contribute to inconsistent clinical and professional integration. CONCLUSION: The concept of proximity appears a promising complement to existing models of integration, especially in complex contexts such as cancer networks. HIGHLIGHTS: Deliberate actions at different levels within the cancer network create a number of dimensions of proximity. Geographic proximity, be it objective or subjective, facilitates relational, cognitive and institutional proximity. A national cancer plan sustained by shared leadership enhances organizational proximity, facilitating integrated practices. Activation of different dimensions of proximity among network actors likely underpins and sustains functional, normative and organizational integration. Insufficient efforts to create technological and institutional proximity contribute to inconsistent clinical and professional integration. The multiple dimensions of proximity appear a promising complement to existing models of integration, especially in complex contexts such as cancer networks.