Cargando…
Reliability of predictive models to support early decision making in the emergency department for patients with confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19: the Pescara Covid Hospital score
BACKGROUND: The hospital management of patients diagnosed with COVID-19 can be hampered by heterogeneous characteristics at entry into the emergency department. We aimed to identify demographic, clinical and laboratory parameters associated with higher risks of hospitalisation, oxygen support, admis...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9390116/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35986291 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08421-4 |
_version_ | 1784770581196963840 |
---|---|
author | Polilli, Ennio Frattari, Antonella Esposito, Jessica Elisabetta D’Amato, Milena Rapacchiale, Giorgia D’Intino, Angela Albani, Alberto Di Iorio, Giancarlo Carinci, Fabrizio Parruti, Giustino |
author_facet | Polilli, Ennio Frattari, Antonella Esposito, Jessica Elisabetta D’Amato, Milena Rapacchiale, Giorgia D’Intino, Angela Albani, Alberto Di Iorio, Giancarlo Carinci, Fabrizio Parruti, Giustino |
author_sort | Polilli, Ennio |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The hospital management of patients diagnosed with COVID-19 can be hampered by heterogeneous characteristics at entry into the emergency department. We aimed to identify demographic, clinical and laboratory parameters associated with higher risks of hospitalisation, oxygen support, admission to intensive care and death, to build a risk score for clinical decision making at presentation to the emergency department. METHODS: We carried out a retrospective study using linked administrative data and laboratory parameters available in the initial phase of the pandemic at the emergency department of the regional reference hospital of Pescara, Abruzzo, Italy, March–June 2020. Logistic regression and Cox modelling were used to identify independent predictors for risk stratification. Validation was carried out collecting data from an extended timeframe covering other variants of concern, including Alpha (December 2020–January 2021) and Delta/Omicron (January–March 2022). RESULTS: Several clinical and laboratory parameters were significantly associated to the outcomes of interest, independently from age and gender. The strongest predictors were: for hospitalisation, monocyte distribution width ≥ 22 (4.09; 2.21–7.72) and diabetes (OR = 3.04; 1.09–9.84); for oxygen support: saturation < 95% (OR = 11.01; 3.75–41.14), lactate dehydrogenase≥237 U/L (OR = 5.93; 2.40–15.39) and lymphocytes< 1.2 × 10(3)/μL (OR = 4.49; 1.84–11.53); for intensive care, end stage renal disease (OR = 59.42; 2.43–2230.60), lactate dehydrogenase≥334 U/L (OR = 5.59; 2.46–13.84), D-dimer≥2.37 mg/L (OR = 5.18; 1.14–26.36), monocyte distribution width ≥ 25 (OR = 3.32; 1.39–8.50); for death, procalcitonin≥0.2 ng/mL (HR = 2.86; 1.95–4.19) and saturation < 96% (HR = 2.74; 1.76–4.28). Risk scores derived from predictive models using optimal thresholds achieved values of the area under the curve between 81 and 91%. Validation of the scoring algorithm for the evolving virus achieved accuracy between 65 and 84%. CONCLUSIONS: A set of parameters that are normally available at emergency departments of any hospital can be used to stratify patients with COVID-19 at risk of severe conditions. The method shall be calibrated to support timely clinical decision during the first hours of admission with different variants of concern. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-08421-4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9390116 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93901162022-08-21 Reliability of predictive models to support early decision making in the emergency department for patients with confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19: the Pescara Covid Hospital score Polilli, Ennio Frattari, Antonella Esposito, Jessica Elisabetta D’Amato, Milena Rapacchiale, Giorgia D’Intino, Angela Albani, Alberto Di Iorio, Giancarlo Carinci, Fabrizio Parruti, Giustino BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: The hospital management of patients diagnosed with COVID-19 can be hampered by heterogeneous characteristics at entry into the emergency department. We aimed to identify demographic, clinical and laboratory parameters associated with higher risks of hospitalisation, oxygen support, admission to intensive care and death, to build a risk score for clinical decision making at presentation to the emergency department. METHODS: We carried out a retrospective study using linked administrative data and laboratory parameters available in the initial phase of the pandemic at the emergency department of the regional reference hospital of Pescara, Abruzzo, Italy, March–June 2020. Logistic regression and Cox modelling were used to identify independent predictors for risk stratification. Validation was carried out collecting data from an extended timeframe covering other variants of concern, including Alpha (December 2020–January 2021) and Delta/Omicron (January–March 2022). RESULTS: Several clinical and laboratory parameters were significantly associated to the outcomes of interest, independently from age and gender. The strongest predictors were: for hospitalisation, monocyte distribution width ≥ 22 (4.09; 2.21–7.72) and diabetes (OR = 3.04; 1.09–9.84); for oxygen support: saturation < 95% (OR = 11.01; 3.75–41.14), lactate dehydrogenase≥237 U/L (OR = 5.93; 2.40–15.39) and lymphocytes< 1.2 × 10(3)/μL (OR = 4.49; 1.84–11.53); for intensive care, end stage renal disease (OR = 59.42; 2.43–2230.60), lactate dehydrogenase≥334 U/L (OR = 5.59; 2.46–13.84), D-dimer≥2.37 mg/L (OR = 5.18; 1.14–26.36), monocyte distribution width ≥ 25 (OR = 3.32; 1.39–8.50); for death, procalcitonin≥0.2 ng/mL (HR = 2.86; 1.95–4.19) and saturation < 96% (HR = 2.74; 1.76–4.28). Risk scores derived from predictive models using optimal thresholds achieved values of the area under the curve between 81 and 91%. Validation of the scoring algorithm for the evolving virus achieved accuracy between 65 and 84%. CONCLUSIONS: A set of parameters that are normally available at emergency departments of any hospital can be used to stratify patients with COVID-19 at risk of severe conditions. The method shall be calibrated to support timely clinical decision during the first hours of admission with different variants of concern. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-08421-4. BioMed Central 2022-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9390116/ /pubmed/35986291 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08421-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Polilli, Ennio Frattari, Antonella Esposito, Jessica Elisabetta D’Amato, Milena Rapacchiale, Giorgia D’Intino, Angela Albani, Alberto Di Iorio, Giancarlo Carinci, Fabrizio Parruti, Giustino Reliability of predictive models to support early decision making in the emergency department for patients with confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19: the Pescara Covid Hospital score |
title | Reliability of predictive models to support early decision making in the emergency department for patients with confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19: the Pescara Covid Hospital score |
title_full | Reliability of predictive models to support early decision making in the emergency department for patients with confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19: the Pescara Covid Hospital score |
title_fullStr | Reliability of predictive models to support early decision making in the emergency department for patients with confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19: the Pescara Covid Hospital score |
title_full_unstemmed | Reliability of predictive models to support early decision making in the emergency department for patients with confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19: the Pescara Covid Hospital score |
title_short | Reliability of predictive models to support early decision making in the emergency department for patients with confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19: the Pescara Covid Hospital score |
title_sort | reliability of predictive models to support early decision making in the emergency department for patients with confirmed diagnosis of covid-19: the pescara covid hospital score |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9390116/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35986291 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08421-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT polilliennio reliabilityofpredictivemodelstosupportearlydecisionmakingintheemergencydepartmentforpatientswithconfirmeddiagnosisofcovid19thepescaracovidhospitalscore AT frattariantonella reliabilityofpredictivemodelstosupportearlydecisionmakingintheemergencydepartmentforpatientswithconfirmeddiagnosisofcovid19thepescaracovidhospitalscore AT espositojessicaelisabetta reliabilityofpredictivemodelstosupportearlydecisionmakingintheemergencydepartmentforpatientswithconfirmeddiagnosisofcovid19thepescaracovidhospitalscore AT damatomilena reliabilityofpredictivemodelstosupportearlydecisionmakingintheemergencydepartmentforpatientswithconfirmeddiagnosisofcovid19thepescaracovidhospitalscore AT rapacchialegiorgia reliabilityofpredictivemodelstosupportearlydecisionmakingintheemergencydepartmentforpatientswithconfirmeddiagnosisofcovid19thepescaracovidhospitalscore AT dintinoangela reliabilityofpredictivemodelstosupportearlydecisionmakingintheemergencydepartmentforpatientswithconfirmeddiagnosisofcovid19thepescaracovidhospitalscore AT albanialberto reliabilityofpredictivemodelstosupportearlydecisionmakingintheemergencydepartmentforpatientswithconfirmeddiagnosisofcovid19thepescaracovidhospitalscore AT diioriogiancarlo reliabilityofpredictivemodelstosupportearlydecisionmakingintheemergencydepartmentforpatientswithconfirmeddiagnosisofcovid19thepescaracovidhospitalscore AT carincifabrizio reliabilityofpredictivemodelstosupportearlydecisionmakingintheemergencydepartmentforpatientswithconfirmeddiagnosisofcovid19thepescaracovidhospitalscore AT parrutigiustino reliabilityofpredictivemodelstosupportearlydecisionmakingintheemergencydepartmentforpatientswithconfirmeddiagnosisofcovid19thepescaracovidhospitalscore |