Cargando…
Commentary: Tricuspid repair—why the hesitation?
Autores principales: | Nafday, Heidi B., Grossi, Eugene A. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9390464/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36003867 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xjon.2020.06.001 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Commentary: Addition of papillary muscle septalization to tricuspid valve repair: Boom or bust?
por: Hirji, Sameer A., et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Commentary: Tricuspidization of a quadricuspid aortic valve: Different valve, same repair
por: Burkhart, Harold M., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Commentary: Subvalvular procedures offer hope for better results in tricuspid valve repair
por: Lamelas, Joseph, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Commentary: Bespoke tricuspid tailoring—bringing patient-specific valve repair to the forgotten valve
por: Shad, Rohan, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Commentary: The tricuspid valve: No longer forgotten but still unknown
por: Romano, Matthew A.
Publicado: (2020)