Cargando…
Facilitators of Multisector Collaboration for Delivering Cancer Control Interventions in Rural Communities: A Descriptive Qualitative Study
PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES: Multisector collaboration is a widely promoted strategy to increase equitable availability, access, and use of healthy foods, safe places for physical activity, social supports, and preventive health care services. Yet fewer studies and resources exist for collaboration among...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9390795/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35951440 http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd19.210450 |
_version_ | 1784770733355827200 |
---|---|
author | Allen, Peg Walsh-Bailey, Callie Hunleth, Jean Carothers, Bobbi J. Brownson, Ross C. |
author_facet | Allen, Peg Walsh-Bailey, Callie Hunleth, Jean Carothers, Bobbi J. Brownson, Ross C. |
author_sort | Allen, Peg |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES: Multisector collaboration is a widely promoted strategy to increase equitable availability, access, and use of healthy foods, safe places for physical activity, social supports, and preventive health care services. Yet fewer studies and resources exist for collaboration among governmental and nongovernmental agencies to address public problems in rural areas, despite an excess burden of risk factors for cancer morbidity and mortality. We aimed to learn about cancer prevention activities and collaboration facilitators among rural informal interagency networks. EVALUATION METHODS: In 2020, researchers conducted semistructured interviews with staff from rural public health and social services agencies, community health centers, and extension offices. Agency staff were from 5 service areas across 27 rural counties in Missouri and Illinois with high poverty rates and excess cancer risks and mortality. We conducted a thematic analysis to code interview transcripts and identify key themes. RESULTS: Exchanging information, cohosting annual or one-time events, and promoting other agencies’ services and programs were the most commonly described collaborative activities among the 32 participants interviewed. Participants indicated a desire to improve collaborations by writing more grants together to codevelop ongoing prevention programs and further share resources. Participants expressed needs to increase community outreach, improve referral systems, and expand screenings. We identified 5 facilitator themes: commitment to address community needs, mutual willingness to collaborate, long-standing relationships, smaller community structures, and necessity of leveraging limited resources. Challenges included lack of funding and time, long travel distances, competing priorities, difficulty replacing staff in remote communities, and jurisdictional boundaries. Although the COVID-19 pandemic further limited staff availability for collaboration, participants noted benefits of remote collaborative meetings. IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC HEALTH: Rural areas need consistent funding and other resources to support health-improving multisector initiatives. Existing strengths found in the rural underresourced areas can facilitate multisector collaborations for cancer prevention, including long-standing relationships, small community structures, and the need to leverage limited resources. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9390795 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Centers for Disease Control and Prevention |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93907952022-09-06 Facilitators of Multisector Collaboration for Delivering Cancer Control Interventions in Rural Communities: A Descriptive Qualitative Study Allen, Peg Walsh-Bailey, Callie Hunleth, Jean Carothers, Bobbi J. Brownson, Ross C. Prev Chronic Dis Implementation Evaluation PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES: Multisector collaboration is a widely promoted strategy to increase equitable availability, access, and use of healthy foods, safe places for physical activity, social supports, and preventive health care services. Yet fewer studies and resources exist for collaboration among governmental and nongovernmental agencies to address public problems in rural areas, despite an excess burden of risk factors for cancer morbidity and mortality. We aimed to learn about cancer prevention activities and collaboration facilitators among rural informal interagency networks. EVALUATION METHODS: In 2020, researchers conducted semistructured interviews with staff from rural public health and social services agencies, community health centers, and extension offices. Agency staff were from 5 service areas across 27 rural counties in Missouri and Illinois with high poverty rates and excess cancer risks and mortality. We conducted a thematic analysis to code interview transcripts and identify key themes. RESULTS: Exchanging information, cohosting annual or one-time events, and promoting other agencies’ services and programs were the most commonly described collaborative activities among the 32 participants interviewed. Participants indicated a desire to improve collaborations by writing more grants together to codevelop ongoing prevention programs and further share resources. Participants expressed needs to increase community outreach, improve referral systems, and expand screenings. We identified 5 facilitator themes: commitment to address community needs, mutual willingness to collaborate, long-standing relationships, smaller community structures, and necessity of leveraging limited resources. Challenges included lack of funding and time, long travel distances, competing priorities, difficulty replacing staff in remote communities, and jurisdictional boundaries. Although the COVID-19 pandemic further limited staff availability for collaboration, participants noted benefits of remote collaborative meetings. IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC HEALTH: Rural areas need consistent funding and other resources to support health-improving multisector initiatives. Existing strengths found in the rural underresourced areas can facilitate multisector collaborations for cancer prevention, including long-standing relationships, small community structures, and the need to leverage limited resources. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2022-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9390795/ /pubmed/35951440 http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd19.210450 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Preventing Chronic Disease is a publication of the U.S. Government. This publication is in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from this work may be reprinted freely. Use of these materials should be properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Implementation Evaluation Allen, Peg Walsh-Bailey, Callie Hunleth, Jean Carothers, Bobbi J. Brownson, Ross C. Facilitators of Multisector Collaboration for Delivering Cancer Control Interventions in Rural Communities: A Descriptive Qualitative Study |
title | Facilitators of Multisector Collaboration for Delivering Cancer Control Interventions in Rural Communities: A Descriptive Qualitative Study |
title_full | Facilitators of Multisector Collaboration for Delivering Cancer Control Interventions in Rural Communities: A Descriptive Qualitative Study |
title_fullStr | Facilitators of Multisector Collaboration for Delivering Cancer Control Interventions in Rural Communities: A Descriptive Qualitative Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Facilitators of Multisector Collaboration for Delivering Cancer Control Interventions in Rural Communities: A Descriptive Qualitative Study |
title_short | Facilitators of Multisector Collaboration for Delivering Cancer Control Interventions in Rural Communities: A Descriptive Qualitative Study |
title_sort | facilitators of multisector collaboration for delivering cancer control interventions in rural communities: a descriptive qualitative study |
topic | Implementation Evaluation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9390795/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35951440 http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd19.210450 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT allenpeg facilitatorsofmultisectorcollaborationfordeliveringcancercontrolinterventionsinruralcommunitiesadescriptivequalitativestudy AT walshbaileycallie facilitatorsofmultisectorcollaborationfordeliveringcancercontrolinterventionsinruralcommunitiesadescriptivequalitativestudy AT hunlethjean facilitatorsofmultisectorcollaborationfordeliveringcancercontrolinterventionsinruralcommunitiesadescriptivequalitativestudy AT carothersbobbij facilitatorsofmultisectorcollaborationfordeliveringcancercontrolinterventionsinruralcommunitiesadescriptivequalitativestudy AT brownsonrossc facilitatorsofmultisectorcollaborationfordeliveringcancercontrolinterventionsinruralcommunitiesadescriptivequalitativestudy |