Cargando…
Reasoning on conflicting information: An empirical study of Formal Argumentation
According to the Argumentative Theory, human reasoning has an argumentative function, which consists of devising and evaluating arguments for and against various claims. It is however unclear how humans handle conflicting claims they face in everyday life (i.e., “Bob is telling me that Alice is at t...
Autores principales: | Guillaume, Mathieu, Cramer, Marcos, van der Torre, Leendert, Schiltz, Christine |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9390901/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35984811 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273225 |
Ejemplares similares
-
An argumentation semantics for rational human evaluation of arguments
por: Cramer, Marcos, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Reason and argument /
por: Feldman, Richard, 1948-
Publicado: (1993) -
Reason and argument /
por: Feldman, Richard, 1948-
Publicado: (1999) -
Improving analytical reasoning and argument understanding: a quasi-experimental field study of argument visualization
por: Cullen, Simon, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Neural-Symbolic Argumentation Mining: An Argument in Favor of Deep Learning and Reasoning
por: Galassi, Andrea, et al.
Publicado: (2020)