Cargando…

Two-point Compression Ultrasound Technique Risks Missing Isolated Femoral Vein DVTs

BACKGROUND: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a common vascular problem seen in the emergency department (ED) and is commonly identified using ultrasound performed by a vascular lab, the radiology department, or at the point of care. Previous studies have assessed the utility of a two-point vs sequentia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tabbut, Matthew, Ebersole, Nate, Icken, Lauren, Jones, Robert, Gramer, Diane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9391002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35980403
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2022.2.53830
_version_ 1784770773050720256
author Tabbut, Matthew
Ebersole, Nate
Icken, Lauren
Jones, Robert
Gramer, Diane
author_facet Tabbut, Matthew
Ebersole, Nate
Icken, Lauren
Jones, Robert
Gramer, Diane
author_sort Tabbut, Matthew
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a common vascular problem seen in the emergency department (ED) and is commonly identified using ultrasound performed by a vascular lab, the radiology department, or at the point of care. Previous studies have assessed the utility of a two-point vs sequential technique to identify the presence of a thrombus. One particular study reported a concerning rate of isolated femoral vein thrombi that would be missed by a two-point technique. OBJECTIVES: In this study we sought to determine whether the two-point technique misses isolated femoral vein thrombi. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients who had a new diagnosis of DVT in the ED diagnosed with vascular lab, radiology, or point-of-care ultrasound to assess for the presence and rate of thrombi that would be missed using a two-point scanning technique. RESULTS: We included in our study 356 patients with a diagnosis of new DVT. In our population, 21 (5.9%; 0.95 confidence interval: 3.7%, 8.9%) patients were identified with thrombi isolated to the femoral vein. CONCLUSION: The two-point technique for lower extremity vascular ultrasound is insufficient for ruling out proximal DVTs in ED patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9391002
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93910022022-08-22 Two-point Compression Ultrasound Technique Risks Missing Isolated Femoral Vein DVTs Tabbut, Matthew Ebersole, Nate Icken, Lauren Jones, Robert Gramer, Diane West J Emerg Med Technology BACKGROUND: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a common vascular problem seen in the emergency department (ED) and is commonly identified using ultrasound performed by a vascular lab, the radiology department, or at the point of care. Previous studies have assessed the utility of a two-point vs sequential technique to identify the presence of a thrombus. One particular study reported a concerning rate of isolated femoral vein thrombi that would be missed by a two-point technique. OBJECTIVES: In this study we sought to determine whether the two-point technique misses isolated femoral vein thrombi. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients who had a new diagnosis of DVT in the ED diagnosed with vascular lab, radiology, or point-of-care ultrasound to assess for the presence and rate of thrombi that would be missed using a two-point scanning technique. RESULTS: We included in our study 356 patients with a diagnosis of new DVT. In our population, 21 (5.9%; 0.95 confidence interval: 3.7%, 8.9%) patients were identified with thrombi isolated to the femoral vein. CONCLUSION: The two-point technique for lower extremity vascular ultrasound is insufficient for ruling out proximal DVTs in ED patients. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2022-07 2022-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9391002/ /pubmed/35980403 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2022.2.53830 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Tabbut et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle Technology
Tabbut, Matthew
Ebersole, Nate
Icken, Lauren
Jones, Robert
Gramer, Diane
Two-point Compression Ultrasound Technique Risks Missing Isolated Femoral Vein DVTs
title Two-point Compression Ultrasound Technique Risks Missing Isolated Femoral Vein DVTs
title_full Two-point Compression Ultrasound Technique Risks Missing Isolated Femoral Vein DVTs
title_fullStr Two-point Compression Ultrasound Technique Risks Missing Isolated Femoral Vein DVTs
title_full_unstemmed Two-point Compression Ultrasound Technique Risks Missing Isolated Femoral Vein DVTs
title_short Two-point Compression Ultrasound Technique Risks Missing Isolated Femoral Vein DVTs
title_sort two-point compression ultrasound technique risks missing isolated femoral vein dvts
topic Technology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9391002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35980403
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2022.2.53830
work_keys_str_mv AT tabbutmatthew twopointcompressionultrasoundtechniquerisksmissingisolatedfemoralveindvts
AT ebersolenate twopointcompressionultrasoundtechniquerisksmissingisolatedfemoralveindvts
AT ickenlauren twopointcompressionultrasoundtechniquerisksmissingisolatedfemoralveindvts
AT jonesrobert twopointcompressionultrasoundtechniquerisksmissingisolatedfemoralveindvts
AT gramerdiane twopointcompressionultrasoundtechniquerisksmissingisolatedfemoralveindvts