Cargando…
Two-point Compression Ultrasound Technique Risks Missing Isolated Femoral Vein DVTs
BACKGROUND: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a common vascular problem seen in the emergency department (ED) and is commonly identified using ultrasound performed by a vascular lab, the radiology department, or at the point of care. Previous studies have assessed the utility of a two-point vs sequentia...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9391002/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35980403 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2022.2.53830 |
_version_ | 1784770773050720256 |
---|---|
author | Tabbut, Matthew Ebersole, Nate Icken, Lauren Jones, Robert Gramer, Diane |
author_facet | Tabbut, Matthew Ebersole, Nate Icken, Lauren Jones, Robert Gramer, Diane |
author_sort | Tabbut, Matthew |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a common vascular problem seen in the emergency department (ED) and is commonly identified using ultrasound performed by a vascular lab, the radiology department, or at the point of care. Previous studies have assessed the utility of a two-point vs sequential technique to identify the presence of a thrombus. One particular study reported a concerning rate of isolated femoral vein thrombi that would be missed by a two-point technique. OBJECTIVES: In this study we sought to determine whether the two-point technique misses isolated femoral vein thrombi. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients who had a new diagnosis of DVT in the ED diagnosed with vascular lab, radiology, or point-of-care ultrasound to assess for the presence and rate of thrombi that would be missed using a two-point scanning technique. RESULTS: We included in our study 356 patients with a diagnosis of new DVT. In our population, 21 (5.9%; 0.95 confidence interval: 3.7%, 8.9%) patients were identified with thrombi isolated to the femoral vein. CONCLUSION: The two-point technique for lower extremity vascular ultrasound is insufficient for ruling out proximal DVTs in ED patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9391002 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93910022022-08-22 Two-point Compression Ultrasound Technique Risks Missing Isolated Femoral Vein DVTs Tabbut, Matthew Ebersole, Nate Icken, Lauren Jones, Robert Gramer, Diane West J Emerg Med Technology BACKGROUND: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a common vascular problem seen in the emergency department (ED) and is commonly identified using ultrasound performed by a vascular lab, the radiology department, or at the point of care. Previous studies have assessed the utility of a two-point vs sequential technique to identify the presence of a thrombus. One particular study reported a concerning rate of isolated femoral vein thrombi that would be missed by a two-point technique. OBJECTIVES: In this study we sought to determine whether the two-point technique misses isolated femoral vein thrombi. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients who had a new diagnosis of DVT in the ED diagnosed with vascular lab, radiology, or point-of-care ultrasound to assess for the presence and rate of thrombi that would be missed using a two-point scanning technique. RESULTS: We included in our study 356 patients with a diagnosis of new DVT. In our population, 21 (5.9%; 0.95 confidence interval: 3.7%, 8.9%) patients were identified with thrombi isolated to the femoral vein. CONCLUSION: The two-point technique for lower extremity vascular ultrasound is insufficient for ruling out proximal DVTs in ED patients. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2022-07 2022-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9391002/ /pubmed/35980403 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2022.2.53830 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Tabbut et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | Technology Tabbut, Matthew Ebersole, Nate Icken, Lauren Jones, Robert Gramer, Diane Two-point Compression Ultrasound Technique Risks Missing Isolated Femoral Vein DVTs |
title | Two-point Compression Ultrasound Technique Risks Missing Isolated Femoral Vein DVTs |
title_full | Two-point Compression Ultrasound Technique Risks Missing Isolated Femoral Vein DVTs |
title_fullStr | Two-point Compression Ultrasound Technique Risks Missing Isolated Femoral Vein DVTs |
title_full_unstemmed | Two-point Compression Ultrasound Technique Risks Missing Isolated Femoral Vein DVTs |
title_short | Two-point Compression Ultrasound Technique Risks Missing Isolated Femoral Vein DVTs |
title_sort | two-point compression ultrasound technique risks missing isolated femoral vein dvts |
topic | Technology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9391002/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35980403 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2022.2.53830 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tabbutmatthew twopointcompressionultrasoundtechniquerisksmissingisolatedfemoralveindvts AT ebersolenate twopointcompressionultrasoundtechniquerisksmissingisolatedfemoralveindvts AT ickenlauren twopointcompressionultrasoundtechniquerisksmissingisolatedfemoralveindvts AT jonesrobert twopointcompressionultrasoundtechniquerisksmissingisolatedfemoralveindvts AT gramerdiane twopointcompressionultrasoundtechniquerisksmissingisolatedfemoralveindvts |