Cargando…

Poison Ivy Dermatitis Treatment Patterns and Utilization: A Retrospective Claims-based Analysis

INTRODUCTION: Poison ivy (toxicodendron) dermatitis (TD) resulting from contact with poison ivy, oak, or sumac is a common form of allergic contact dermatitis that impacts millions of people in the United State every year and results in an estimated 43,000 emergency department (ED) visits annually....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Butt, Melissa, Flamm, Avram, Marks, James G., Flamm, Alexandra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9391006/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35980412
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2022.March.55516
_version_ 1784770774014361600
author Butt, Melissa
Flamm, Avram
Marks, James G.
Flamm, Alexandra
author_facet Butt, Melissa
Flamm, Avram
Marks, James G.
Flamm, Alexandra
author_sort Butt, Melissa
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Poison ivy (toxicodendron) dermatitis (TD) resulting from contact with poison ivy, oak, or sumac is a common form of allergic contact dermatitis that impacts millions of people in the United State every year and results in an estimated 43,000 emergency department (ED) visits annually. Our objective in this study was to evaluate whether healthcare utilization outcomes are impacted by prescription practices of systemic corticosteroids. METHODS: We used a health claims database from 2017–2018 of those treated for TD. Descriptive statistics and logistics regression models were used to characterize trends. RESULTS: We included in this analysis 115,885 claims from 108,111 unique individuals (93.29%) with 7,774 (6.71%) return claims within 28 days. Of the return claims, 470 (6.05%) were to the ED. Emergency clinicians offered no oral corticosteroid prescription 5.27% (n = 3,194) of the time; 3276 (86.26%) prescriptions were for a duration of 1–13 days, 410 (10.80%) were for 14–20 days, and 112 (2.95%) were for >21 days. Further, we found that shorter duration oral corticosteroids (odds ratio [OR] 1.30; 95% confidence interval 1.17–1.44; P <0.001) and initial treatment for TD at the ED compared to primary care clinicians (OR 0.87 [0.80, 0.96]; P <0.001) and other non-dermatologists (OR 0.89 [0.80, 0.98]; P = 0.01) places patients at an increased risk for return visits with healthcare clinicians when controlling for drug group, duration of treatment, and initial treatment location. CONCLUSION: Despite recommendations to treat TD with oral steroids for at least 14 days, most emergency clinicians offered this treatment for shorter durations and was associated with return visits. Emergency clinicians should consider treatment of two to three weeks when providing systemic steroid coverage when there are no limiting contraindications, especially as patients who present to the ED may do so with more severe disease. Additional education may be needed on appropriate treatment pathways for TD to reduce healthcare utilization associated with undertreatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9391006
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93910062022-08-22 Poison Ivy Dermatitis Treatment Patterns and Utilization: A Retrospective Claims-based Analysis Butt, Melissa Flamm, Avram Marks, James G. Flamm, Alexandra West J Emerg Med Clinical Practice INTRODUCTION: Poison ivy (toxicodendron) dermatitis (TD) resulting from contact with poison ivy, oak, or sumac is a common form of allergic contact dermatitis that impacts millions of people in the United State every year and results in an estimated 43,000 emergency department (ED) visits annually. Our objective in this study was to evaluate whether healthcare utilization outcomes are impacted by prescription practices of systemic corticosteroids. METHODS: We used a health claims database from 2017–2018 of those treated for TD. Descriptive statistics and logistics regression models were used to characterize trends. RESULTS: We included in this analysis 115,885 claims from 108,111 unique individuals (93.29%) with 7,774 (6.71%) return claims within 28 days. Of the return claims, 470 (6.05%) were to the ED. Emergency clinicians offered no oral corticosteroid prescription 5.27% (n = 3,194) of the time; 3276 (86.26%) prescriptions were for a duration of 1–13 days, 410 (10.80%) were for 14–20 days, and 112 (2.95%) were for >21 days. Further, we found that shorter duration oral corticosteroids (odds ratio [OR] 1.30; 95% confidence interval 1.17–1.44; P <0.001) and initial treatment for TD at the ED compared to primary care clinicians (OR 0.87 [0.80, 0.96]; P <0.001) and other non-dermatologists (OR 0.89 [0.80, 0.98]; P = 0.01) places patients at an increased risk for return visits with healthcare clinicians when controlling for drug group, duration of treatment, and initial treatment location. CONCLUSION: Despite recommendations to treat TD with oral steroids for at least 14 days, most emergency clinicians offered this treatment for shorter durations and was associated with return visits. Emergency clinicians should consider treatment of two to three weeks when providing systemic steroid coverage when there are no limiting contraindications, especially as patients who present to the ED may do so with more severe disease. Additional education may be needed on appropriate treatment pathways for TD to reduce healthcare utilization associated with undertreatment. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2022-07 2022-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9391006/ /pubmed/35980412 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2022.March.55516 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Butt et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle Clinical Practice
Butt, Melissa
Flamm, Avram
Marks, James G.
Flamm, Alexandra
Poison Ivy Dermatitis Treatment Patterns and Utilization: A Retrospective Claims-based Analysis
title Poison Ivy Dermatitis Treatment Patterns and Utilization: A Retrospective Claims-based Analysis
title_full Poison Ivy Dermatitis Treatment Patterns and Utilization: A Retrospective Claims-based Analysis
title_fullStr Poison Ivy Dermatitis Treatment Patterns and Utilization: A Retrospective Claims-based Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Poison Ivy Dermatitis Treatment Patterns and Utilization: A Retrospective Claims-based Analysis
title_short Poison Ivy Dermatitis Treatment Patterns and Utilization: A Retrospective Claims-based Analysis
title_sort poison ivy dermatitis treatment patterns and utilization: a retrospective claims-based analysis
topic Clinical Practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9391006/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35980412
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2022.March.55516
work_keys_str_mv AT buttmelissa poisonivydermatitistreatmentpatternsandutilizationaretrospectiveclaimsbasedanalysis
AT flammavram poisonivydermatitistreatmentpatternsandutilizationaretrospectiveclaimsbasedanalysis
AT marksjamesg poisonivydermatitistreatmentpatternsandutilizationaretrospectiveclaimsbasedanalysis
AT flammalexandra poisonivydermatitistreatmentpatternsandutilizationaretrospectiveclaimsbasedanalysis