Cargando…

Stroke survivor perceptions of using an exoskeleton during acute gait rehabilitation

Robotic-assisted gait training (RAGT) devices allow intensive high repetition of the gait cycle in individuals with locomotor disability, with reduced therapist effort. In addition to usual rehabilitation, RAGT post-stroke improves the likelihood of regaining independent walking, with maximum effica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McDonald, Caitlin, Fingleton, Caitriona, Murphy, Sean, Lennon, Olive
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9391354/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35986162
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-18188-7
_version_ 1784770840288559104
author McDonald, Caitlin
Fingleton, Caitriona
Murphy, Sean
Lennon, Olive
author_facet McDonald, Caitlin
Fingleton, Caitriona
Murphy, Sean
Lennon, Olive
author_sort McDonald, Caitlin
collection PubMed
description Robotic-assisted gait training (RAGT) devices allow intensive high repetition of the gait cycle in individuals with locomotor disability, with reduced therapist effort. In addition to usual rehabilitation, RAGT post-stroke improves the likelihood of regaining independent walking, with maximum efficacy identified in the acute and subacute phases of stroke. This study explores the usability and acceptance of RAGT among persons with stroke in an acute hospital setting and examines users’ perceptions of two different modes of robotic assistance provided during rehabilitation. A mixed-methods approach comprised semi-structed interviews of end-user perspectives of RAGT in an acute hospital setting following stroke and two 10-point Likert scales rating how comfortable and how natural robotic gait felt using different assistance modes. Content analysis of qualitative data was undertaken with results synthesised by common meaning units. Quantitative data were reported using summary statistics, with Spearmann’s correlation co-efficient examining the relationship between Likert scale ratings and measures of participants’ stroke related disability. Ten individuals (6 men; 4 women; mean age of 64.5. ± 13 years) were recruited in an acute hospital setting following admission with a stroke diagnosis. Content analysis of interview transcripts identified discussion units centring around positive aspects of how helpful the device was, negative aspects related to set-up time, weight of the device and multiple instructions delivered during use. Initially participants identified that the device could look intimidating, and they feared falling in the device but they subsequently identified the correct mindset for using the device is to trust the technology and not be afraid. Mean ratings for device comfort (7.94 ± 1.4) and how natural walking felt (7.05 ± 1.9) were favourable. Interestingly, a strong relationship was identified, whereby the higher the level of disability, the more natural participants rated walking in the device during maximal assistance mode (rho = 0.62; p = 0.138). This study suggests individuals in the early phases of stroke perceive RAGT to be acceptable and helpful in the main, with some associated negative aspects. Walking in the device was rated as comfortable and natural. Those with greater disability rated the assisted walking as more natural.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9391354
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93913542022-08-21 Stroke survivor perceptions of using an exoskeleton during acute gait rehabilitation McDonald, Caitlin Fingleton, Caitriona Murphy, Sean Lennon, Olive Sci Rep Article Robotic-assisted gait training (RAGT) devices allow intensive high repetition of the gait cycle in individuals with locomotor disability, with reduced therapist effort. In addition to usual rehabilitation, RAGT post-stroke improves the likelihood of regaining independent walking, with maximum efficacy identified in the acute and subacute phases of stroke. This study explores the usability and acceptance of RAGT among persons with stroke in an acute hospital setting and examines users’ perceptions of two different modes of robotic assistance provided during rehabilitation. A mixed-methods approach comprised semi-structed interviews of end-user perspectives of RAGT in an acute hospital setting following stroke and two 10-point Likert scales rating how comfortable and how natural robotic gait felt using different assistance modes. Content analysis of qualitative data was undertaken with results synthesised by common meaning units. Quantitative data were reported using summary statistics, with Spearmann’s correlation co-efficient examining the relationship between Likert scale ratings and measures of participants’ stroke related disability. Ten individuals (6 men; 4 women; mean age of 64.5. ± 13 years) were recruited in an acute hospital setting following admission with a stroke diagnosis. Content analysis of interview transcripts identified discussion units centring around positive aspects of how helpful the device was, negative aspects related to set-up time, weight of the device and multiple instructions delivered during use. Initially participants identified that the device could look intimidating, and they feared falling in the device but they subsequently identified the correct mindset for using the device is to trust the technology and not be afraid. Mean ratings for device comfort (7.94 ± 1.4) and how natural walking felt (7.05 ± 1.9) were favourable. Interestingly, a strong relationship was identified, whereby the higher the level of disability, the more natural participants rated walking in the device during maximal assistance mode (rho = 0.62; p = 0.138). This study suggests individuals in the early phases of stroke perceive RAGT to be acceptable and helpful in the main, with some associated negative aspects. Walking in the device was rated as comfortable and natural. Those with greater disability rated the assisted walking as more natural. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9391354/ /pubmed/35986162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-18188-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
McDonald, Caitlin
Fingleton, Caitriona
Murphy, Sean
Lennon, Olive
Stroke survivor perceptions of using an exoskeleton during acute gait rehabilitation
title Stroke survivor perceptions of using an exoskeleton during acute gait rehabilitation
title_full Stroke survivor perceptions of using an exoskeleton during acute gait rehabilitation
title_fullStr Stroke survivor perceptions of using an exoskeleton during acute gait rehabilitation
title_full_unstemmed Stroke survivor perceptions of using an exoskeleton during acute gait rehabilitation
title_short Stroke survivor perceptions of using an exoskeleton during acute gait rehabilitation
title_sort stroke survivor perceptions of using an exoskeleton during acute gait rehabilitation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9391354/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35986162
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-18188-7
work_keys_str_mv AT mcdonaldcaitlin strokesurvivorperceptionsofusinganexoskeletonduringacutegaitrehabilitation
AT fingletoncaitriona strokesurvivorperceptionsofusinganexoskeletonduringacutegaitrehabilitation
AT murphysean strokesurvivorperceptionsofusinganexoskeletonduringacutegaitrehabilitation
AT lennonolive strokesurvivorperceptionsofusinganexoskeletonduringacutegaitrehabilitation