Cargando…

Comparison of transverse short-axis classic and oblique long-axis “Syringe-Free” approaches for internal jugular venous catheterization under ultrasound guidance

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There are different ultrasound probe positions used for internal jugular venous catheter placement. Also, in-plane or out of plane needle approach may be used for catheterization. Transverse short-axis classic approach is the most popular performed approach in literature....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ince, Ilker, Arı, Muhammet Ali, Sulak, Muhammet Mustafa, Aksoy, Mehmet
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9391733/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29478705
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2017.12.002
_version_ 1784770914724872192
author Ince, Ilker
Arı, Muhammet Ali
Sulak, Muhammet Mustafa
Aksoy, Mehmet
author_facet Ince, Ilker
Arı, Muhammet Ali
Sulak, Muhammet Mustafa
Aksoy, Mehmet
author_sort Ince, Ilker
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There are different ultrasound probe positions used for internal jugular venous catheter placement. Also, in-plane or out of plane needle approach may be used for catheterization. Transverse short-axis classic approach is the most popular performed approach in literature. “Syringe-Free” is a new described technique that is performed with oblique long-axis approach. We aimed to compare performance of these two approaches. METHODS: This study was conducted as a prospective and randomized study. 80 patients were included the study and allocated into two groups that were named Group C (transverse short-axis classic approach) and Group SF (oblique long-axis syringe-free approach) by a computer-generated randomization. The primary outcome was mean time that guidewire is seen in the Internal jugular vein (performing time). The secondary outcomes were to compare number of needle pass, number of skin puncture and complications between two groups. RESULTS: Demographic and hemodynamic data were not significantly different. The mean performing time was 54.9 ± 19.1 s in Group C and 43.9 ± 15.8 s in Group SF. Significant differences were found between the groups (p = 0.006). Mean number of needle pass was 3.2 (± 2.1) in Group C and 2.1 (± 1.6) in Group SF. There were statistically significant differences between two groups (p = 0.002). The number of skin puncture was 1.6 (± 0.8) and 1.2 (± 0.5) in Group C and SF, respectively (p = 0.027). CONCLUSION: “Syringe-Free” technique has lower performing time, number of needle pass and skin puncture. Also, it allows to follow progress of guide-wire under continuous ultrasound visualization and the procedure does not need assistance during catheter insertion. Namely, “Syringe-Free” is effective, safe and fast technique that may be used to place internal jugular venous catheter.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9391733
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93917332022-08-21 Comparison of transverse short-axis classic and oblique long-axis “Syringe-Free” approaches for internal jugular venous catheterization under ultrasound guidance Ince, Ilker Arı, Muhammet Ali Sulak, Muhammet Mustafa Aksoy, Mehmet Braz J Anesthesiol Scientific Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There are different ultrasound probe positions used for internal jugular venous catheter placement. Also, in-plane or out of plane needle approach may be used for catheterization. Transverse short-axis classic approach is the most popular performed approach in literature. “Syringe-Free” is a new described technique that is performed with oblique long-axis approach. We aimed to compare performance of these two approaches. METHODS: This study was conducted as a prospective and randomized study. 80 patients were included the study and allocated into two groups that were named Group C (transverse short-axis classic approach) and Group SF (oblique long-axis syringe-free approach) by a computer-generated randomization. The primary outcome was mean time that guidewire is seen in the Internal jugular vein (performing time). The secondary outcomes were to compare number of needle pass, number of skin puncture and complications between two groups. RESULTS: Demographic and hemodynamic data were not significantly different. The mean performing time was 54.9 ± 19.1 s in Group C and 43.9 ± 15.8 s in Group SF. Significant differences were found between the groups (p = 0.006). Mean number of needle pass was 3.2 (± 2.1) in Group C and 2.1 (± 1.6) in Group SF. There were statistically significant differences between two groups (p = 0.002). The number of skin puncture was 1.6 (± 0.8) and 1.2 (± 0.5) in Group C and SF, respectively (p = 0.027). CONCLUSION: “Syringe-Free” technique has lower performing time, number of needle pass and skin puncture. Also, it allows to follow progress of guide-wire under continuous ultrasound visualization and the procedure does not need assistance during catheter insertion. Namely, “Syringe-Free” is effective, safe and fast technique that may be used to place internal jugular venous catheter. Elsevier 2018-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9391733/ /pubmed/29478705 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2017.12.002 Text en © 2017 Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Scientific Article
Ince, Ilker
Arı, Muhammet Ali
Sulak, Muhammet Mustafa
Aksoy, Mehmet
Comparison of transverse short-axis classic and oblique long-axis “Syringe-Free” approaches for internal jugular venous catheterization under ultrasound guidance
title Comparison of transverse short-axis classic and oblique long-axis “Syringe-Free” approaches for internal jugular venous catheterization under ultrasound guidance
title_full Comparison of transverse short-axis classic and oblique long-axis “Syringe-Free” approaches for internal jugular venous catheterization under ultrasound guidance
title_fullStr Comparison of transverse short-axis classic and oblique long-axis “Syringe-Free” approaches for internal jugular venous catheterization under ultrasound guidance
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of transverse short-axis classic and oblique long-axis “Syringe-Free” approaches for internal jugular venous catheterization under ultrasound guidance
title_short Comparison of transverse short-axis classic and oblique long-axis “Syringe-Free” approaches for internal jugular venous catheterization under ultrasound guidance
title_sort comparison of transverse short-axis classic and oblique long-axis “syringe-free” approaches for internal jugular venous catheterization under ultrasound guidance
topic Scientific Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9391733/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29478705
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2017.12.002
work_keys_str_mv AT inceilker comparisonoftransverseshortaxisclassicandobliquelongaxissyringefreeapproachesforinternaljugularvenouscatheterizationunderultrasoundguidance
AT arımuhammetali comparisonoftransverseshortaxisclassicandobliquelongaxissyringefreeapproachesforinternaljugularvenouscatheterizationunderultrasoundguidance
AT sulakmuhammetmustafa comparisonoftransverseshortaxisclassicandobliquelongaxissyringefreeapproachesforinternaljugularvenouscatheterizationunderultrasoundguidance
AT aksoymehmet comparisonoftransverseshortaxisclassicandobliquelongaxissyringefreeapproachesforinternaljugularvenouscatheterizationunderultrasoundguidance