Single-surface Intensive Phototherapy or Double-Surface Intensive Phototherapy in Neonatal Non-Hemolytic Hyperbilirubinemia: A Comparison of Effectiveness and Complications

Background: Severe indirect hyperbilirubinemia causes neurotoxicity, leading to potential permanent injuries to the neonatal nervous system. The present study intended to compare the effectiveness and complications of Single-Surface Intensive Phototherapy (SSIP) and Double-Surface Intensive Phototherapy (DSIP) in treating non-hemolytic hyperbilirubinemia in the neonatal ward of the Besat Hospital, Hamadan, Iran. Methods: In this prospective randomized clinical trial, 150 healthy full-term neonates born between 37-42 weeks gestation with ages <14 days old and birth weights ≥2500 gr who were affected by non-hemolytic hyperbilirubinemia with total serum bilirubin of 15-20 mg/dL were randomly allocated to two groups. Each group (n=75) underwent either SSIP or DSIP. Demographics, bilirubin level alterations, weight, platelet count, number of defecation per day, and body temperature of the patients were monitored and recorded in a specific questionnaire. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 26.0 software, with the Chi-square and independent t-test. Results: The pre-intervention levels of indirect bilirubin were 17.07±1.46 mg/dL in the SSIP group and 17.10±1.54 mg/dL in the DSIP group (P-value = 0.853). After 24 and 48 hours of treatment, the mean indirect bilirubin level of the SSIP group reduced to 13.12±1.71 mg/dL and 9.69±1.68 mg/dL, respectively. In the DSIP group, the levels were 11.85±2.17 mg/dL and 8.43±1.56 mg/dL after 24 and 48 hours of treatment, respectively. The absolute reductions of indirect bilirubin were 7.76±3.28 mg/dL for the SSIP group and 8.96±4.49 mg/dL for the DSIP group (P-value = 0.458). Therefore, the indirect bilirubin levels were significantly different between the groups after 24 and 48 hours of treatment and at the time of discharge (P<0.05). There were no significant inter-group differences in weight, platelet count, and incidence of skin rash, while the number of defecation and body temperature were higher in the DSIP group (P <0.05). However, body temperature alterations had no clinical relevance. Conclusion: Compared to the SSIP, the DSIP showed faster effectiveness and led to a shorter hospital stay, while it did not entail higher levels of complications.