Cargando…

Acquiring skills in malignant hyperthermia crisis management: comparison of high-fidelity simulation versus computer-based case study()

INTRODUCTION: The primary purpose of this study was to compare the effect of high fidelity simulation versus a computer-based case solving self-study, in skills acquisition about malignant hyperthermia on first year anesthesiology residents. METHODS: After institutional ethical committee approval, 3...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mejía, Vilma, Gonzalez, Carlos, Delfino, Alejandro E., Altermatt, Fernando R., Corvetto, Marcia A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9391818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29631880
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2018.01.009
_version_ 1784770935205658624
author Mejía, Vilma
Gonzalez, Carlos
Delfino, Alejandro E.
Altermatt, Fernando R.
Corvetto, Marcia A.
author_facet Mejía, Vilma
Gonzalez, Carlos
Delfino, Alejandro E.
Altermatt, Fernando R.
Corvetto, Marcia A.
author_sort Mejía, Vilma
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The primary purpose of this study was to compare the effect of high fidelity simulation versus a computer-based case solving self-study, in skills acquisition about malignant hyperthermia on first year anesthesiology residents. METHODS: After institutional ethical committee approval, 31 first year anesthesiology residents were enrolled in this prospective randomized single-blinded study. Participants were randomized to either a High Fidelity Simulation Scenario or a computer-based Case Study about malignant hyperthermia. After the intervention, all subjects’ performance in was assessed through a high fidelity simulation scenario using a previously validated assessment rubric. Additionally, knowledge tests and a satisfaction survey were applied. Finally, a semi-structured interview was done to assess self-perception of reasoning process and decision-making. RESULTS: 28 first year residents finished successfully the study. Resident's management skill scores were globally higher in High Fidelity Simulation versus Case Study, however they were significant in 4 of the 8 performance rubric elements: recognize signs and symptoms (p = 0.025), prioritization of initial actions of management (p = 0.003), recognize complications (p = 0.025) and communication (p = 0.025). Average scores from pre- and post-test knowledge questionnaires improved from 74% to 85% in the High Fidelity Simulation group, and decreased from 78% to 75% in the Case Study group (p = 0.032). Regarding the qualitative analysis, there was no difference in factors influencing the student's process of reasoning and decision-making with both teaching strategies. CONCLUSION: Simulation-based training with a malignant hyperthermia high-fidelity scenario was superior to computer-based case study, improving knowledge and skills in malignant hyperthermia crisis management, with a very good satisfaction level in anesthesia residents.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9391818
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93918182022-08-21 Acquiring skills in malignant hyperthermia crisis management: comparison of high-fidelity simulation versus computer-based case study() Mejía, Vilma Gonzalez, Carlos Delfino, Alejandro E. Altermatt, Fernando R. Corvetto, Marcia A. Braz J Anesthesiol Scientific Article INTRODUCTION: The primary purpose of this study was to compare the effect of high fidelity simulation versus a computer-based case solving self-study, in skills acquisition about malignant hyperthermia on first year anesthesiology residents. METHODS: After institutional ethical committee approval, 31 first year anesthesiology residents were enrolled in this prospective randomized single-blinded study. Participants were randomized to either a High Fidelity Simulation Scenario or a computer-based Case Study about malignant hyperthermia. After the intervention, all subjects’ performance in was assessed through a high fidelity simulation scenario using a previously validated assessment rubric. Additionally, knowledge tests and a satisfaction survey were applied. Finally, a semi-structured interview was done to assess self-perception of reasoning process and decision-making. RESULTS: 28 first year residents finished successfully the study. Resident's management skill scores were globally higher in High Fidelity Simulation versus Case Study, however they were significant in 4 of the 8 performance rubric elements: recognize signs and symptoms (p = 0.025), prioritization of initial actions of management (p = 0.003), recognize complications (p = 0.025) and communication (p = 0.025). Average scores from pre- and post-test knowledge questionnaires improved from 74% to 85% in the High Fidelity Simulation group, and decreased from 78% to 75% in the Case Study group (p = 0.032). Regarding the qualitative analysis, there was no difference in factors influencing the student's process of reasoning and decision-making with both teaching strategies. CONCLUSION: Simulation-based training with a malignant hyperthermia high-fidelity scenario was superior to computer-based case study, improving knowledge and skills in malignant hyperthermia crisis management, with a very good satisfaction level in anesthesia residents. Elsevier 2018-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9391818/ /pubmed/29631880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2018.01.009 Text en © 2018 Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Scientific Article
Mejía, Vilma
Gonzalez, Carlos
Delfino, Alejandro E.
Altermatt, Fernando R.
Corvetto, Marcia A.
Acquiring skills in malignant hyperthermia crisis management: comparison of high-fidelity simulation versus computer-based case study()
title Acquiring skills in malignant hyperthermia crisis management: comparison of high-fidelity simulation versus computer-based case study()
title_full Acquiring skills in malignant hyperthermia crisis management: comparison of high-fidelity simulation versus computer-based case study()
title_fullStr Acquiring skills in malignant hyperthermia crisis management: comparison of high-fidelity simulation versus computer-based case study()
title_full_unstemmed Acquiring skills in malignant hyperthermia crisis management: comparison of high-fidelity simulation versus computer-based case study()
title_short Acquiring skills in malignant hyperthermia crisis management: comparison of high-fidelity simulation versus computer-based case study()
title_sort acquiring skills in malignant hyperthermia crisis management: comparison of high-fidelity simulation versus computer-based case study()
topic Scientific Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9391818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29631880
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2018.01.009
work_keys_str_mv AT mejiavilma acquiringskillsinmalignanthyperthermiacrisismanagementcomparisonofhighfidelitysimulationversuscomputerbasedcasestudy
AT gonzalezcarlos acquiringskillsinmalignanthyperthermiacrisismanagementcomparisonofhighfidelitysimulationversuscomputerbasedcasestudy
AT delfinoalejandroe acquiringskillsinmalignanthyperthermiacrisismanagementcomparisonofhighfidelitysimulationversuscomputerbasedcasestudy
AT altermattfernandor acquiringskillsinmalignanthyperthermiacrisismanagementcomparisonofhighfidelitysimulationversuscomputerbasedcasestudy
AT corvettomarciaa acquiringskillsinmalignanthyperthermiacrisismanagementcomparisonofhighfidelitysimulationversuscomputerbasedcasestudy