Cargando…

Single needle versus double needle celiac trunk neurolysis in abdominal malignancy pain management: a randomized controlled trial()

BACKGROUND: Computerized tomography-guided celiac plexus neurolysis has become almost a safe technique to alleviate abdominal malignancy pain. We compared the single needle technique with changing patients’ position and the double needle technique using posterior anterocrural approach. METHODS: In D...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abdelghaffar, Nevert A., El-Rahmawy, Ghada F., Elmaddawy, Alaa, El-Badrawy, Adel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9391868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31080008
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2019.01.001
_version_ 1784770947397451776
author Abdelghaffar, Nevert A.
El-Rahmawy, Ghada F.
Elmaddawy, Alaa
El-Badrawy, Adel
author_facet Abdelghaffar, Nevert A.
El-Rahmawy, Ghada F.
Elmaddawy, Alaa
El-Badrawy, Adel
author_sort Abdelghaffar, Nevert A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Computerized tomography-guided celiac plexus neurolysis has become almost a safe technique to alleviate abdominal malignancy pain. We compared the single needle technique with changing patients’ position and the double needle technique using posterior anterocrural approach. METHODS: In Double Needles Celiac Neurolysis Group (n = 17), we used two needles posterior anterocrural technique injecting 12.5 mL phenol 10% on each side in prone position. In Single Needle Celiac Neurolysis Group (n = 17), we used single needle posterior anterocrural approach. 25 mL of phenol 10% was injected from left side while patients were in left lateral position then turned to right side. The monitoring parameters were failure block rate and duration of patient positioning, technique time, Visual Analog Scale, complications (hypotension, diarrhea, vomiting, hemorrhage, neurological damage and infection) and rescue analgesia. RESULTS: The failure block rate and duration of patient positioning significantly increased in double needles celiac neurolysis vs. single needle celiac neurolysis (30.8% vs. 0%; 13.8 ± 1.2 vs. 8.9 ± 1; p = 0.046, p ≤ 0.001 respectively). Also, the technique time increased significantly in double needles celiac neurolysis than single needle celiac neurolysis (24.5 ± 5.1 vs. 15.4 ± 1.8; p ≤ 0.001). No significant differences existed as regards Visual Analog Scale: double needles celiac neurolysis = 2  (0–5), 2 (0–4), 3 (0–6), 3 (2–6) and single needle celiac neurolysis = 3 (0–5), 2 (0–5), 2 (0–4), 4 (2–6) after 1 day, 1 week, 1 and 3 months respectively. However, Visual Analog Scale in each group reduced significantly compared with basal values (p ≤ 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences as regards rescue analgesia and complications (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Single needle celiac neurolysis with changing patients’ position has less failure block rate, less procedure time, shorter duration of patient positioning than double needles celiac neurolysis in abdominal malignancy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9391868
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93918682022-08-21 Single needle versus double needle celiac trunk neurolysis in abdominal malignancy pain management: a randomized controlled trial() Abdelghaffar, Nevert A. El-Rahmawy, Ghada F. Elmaddawy, Alaa El-Badrawy, Adel Braz J Anesthesiol Scientific Article BACKGROUND: Computerized tomography-guided celiac plexus neurolysis has become almost a safe technique to alleviate abdominal malignancy pain. We compared the single needle technique with changing patients’ position and the double needle technique using posterior anterocrural approach. METHODS: In Double Needles Celiac Neurolysis Group (n = 17), we used two needles posterior anterocrural technique injecting 12.5 mL phenol 10% on each side in prone position. In Single Needle Celiac Neurolysis Group (n = 17), we used single needle posterior anterocrural approach. 25 mL of phenol 10% was injected from left side while patients were in left lateral position then turned to right side. The monitoring parameters were failure block rate and duration of patient positioning, technique time, Visual Analog Scale, complications (hypotension, diarrhea, vomiting, hemorrhage, neurological damage and infection) and rescue analgesia. RESULTS: The failure block rate and duration of patient positioning significantly increased in double needles celiac neurolysis vs. single needle celiac neurolysis (30.8% vs. 0%; 13.8 ± 1.2 vs. 8.9 ± 1; p = 0.046, p ≤ 0.001 respectively). Also, the technique time increased significantly in double needles celiac neurolysis than single needle celiac neurolysis (24.5 ± 5.1 vs. 15.4 ± 1.8; p ≤ 0.001). No significant differences existed as regards Visual Analog Scale: double needles celiac neurolysis = 2  (0–5), 2 (0–4), 3 (0–6), 3 (2–6) and single needle celiac neurolysis = 3 (0–5), 2 (0–5), 2 (0–4), 4 (2–6) after 1 day, 1 week, 1 and 3 months respectively. However, Visual Analog Scale in each group reduced significantly compared with basal values (p ≤ 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences as regards rescue analgesia and complications (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Single needle celiac neurolysis with changing patients’ position has less failure block rate, less procedure time, shorter duration of patient positioning than double needles celiac neurolysis in abdominal malignancy. Elsevier 2019-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9391868/ /pubmed/31080008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2019.01.001 Text en © 2019 Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Scientific Article
Abdelghaffar, Nevert A.
El-Rahmawy, Ghada F.
Elmaddawy, Alaa
El-Badrawy, Adel
Single needle versus double needle celiac trunk neurolysis in abdominal malignancy pain management: a randomized controlled trial()
title Single needle versus double needle celiac trunk neurolysis in abdominal malignancy pain management: a randomized controlled trial()
title_full Single needle versus double needle celiac trunk neurolysis in abdominal malignancy pain management: a randomized controlled trial()
title_fullStr Single needle versus double needle celiac trunk neurolysis in abdominal malignancy pain management: a randomized controlled trial()
title_full_unstemmed Single needle versus double needle celiac trunk neurolysis in abdominal malignancy pain management: a randomized controlled trial()
title_short Single needle versus double needle celiac trunk neurolysis in abdominal malignancy pain management: a randomized controlled trial()
title_sort single needle versus double needle celiac trunk neurolysis in abdominal malignancy pain management: a randomized controlled trial()
topic Scientific Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9391868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31080008
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2019.01.001
work_keys_str_mv AT abdelghaffarneverta singleneedleversusdoubleneedleceliactrunkneurolysisinabdominalmalignancypainmanagementarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT elrahmawyghadaf singleneedleversusdoubleneedleceliactrunkneurolysisinabdominalmalignancypainmanagementarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT elmaddawyalaa singleneedleversusdoubleneedleceliactrunkneurolysisinabdominalmalignancypainmanagementarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT elbadrawyadel singleneedleversusdoubleneedleceliactrunkneurolysisinabdominalmalignancypainmanagementarandomizedcontrolledtrial