Cargando…
Single needle versus double needle celiac trunk neurolysis in abdominal malignancy pain management: a randomized controlled trial()
BACKGROUND: Computerized tomography-guided celiac plexus neurolysis has become almost a safe technique to alleviate abdominal malignancy pain. We compared the single needle technique with changing patients’ position and the double needle technique using posterior anterocrural approach. METHODS: In D...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9391868/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31080008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2019.01.001 |
_version_ | 1784770947397451776 |
---|---|
author | Abdelghaffar, Nevert A. El-Rahmawy, Ghada F. Elmaddawy, Alaa El-Badrawy, Adel |
author_facet | Abdelghaffar, Nevert A. El-Rahmawy, Ghada F. Elmaddawy, Alaa El-Badrawy, Adel |
author_sort | Abdelghaffar, Nevert A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Computerized tomography-guided celiac plexus neurolysis has become almost a safe technique to alleviate abdominal malignancy pain. We compared the single needle technique with changing patients’ position and the double needle technique using posterior anterocrural approach. METHODS: In Double Needles Celiac Neurolysis Group (n = 17), we used two needles posterior anterocrural technique injecting 12.5 mL phenol 10% on each side in prone position. In Single Needle Celiac Neurolysis Group (n = 17), we used single needle posterior anterocrural approach. 25 mL of phenol 10% was injected from left side while patients were in left lateral position then turned to right side. The monitoring parameters were failure block rate and duration of patient positioning, technique time, Visual Analog Scale, complications (hypotension, diarrhea, vomiting, hemorrhage, neurological damage and infection) and rescue analgesia. RESULTS: The failure block rate and duration of patient positioning significantly increased in double needles celiac neurolysis vs. single needle celiac neurolysis (30.8% vs. 0%; 13.8 ± 1.2 vs. 8.9 ± 1; p = 0.046, p ≤ 0.001 respectively). Also, the technique time increased significantly in double needles celiac neurolysis than single needle celiac neurolysis (24.5 ± 5.1 vs. 15.4 ± 1.8; p ≤ 0.001). No significant differences existed as regards Visual Analog Scale: double needles celiac neurolysis = 2 (0–5), 2 (0–4), 3 (0–6), 3 (2–6) and single needle celiac neurolysis = 3 (0–5), 2 (0–5), 2 (0–4), 4 (2–6) after 1 day, 1 week, 1 and 3 months respectively. However, Visual Analog Scale in each group reduced significantly compared with basal values (p ≤ 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences as regards rescue analgesia and complications (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Single needle celiac neurolysis with changing patients’ position has less failure block rate, less procedure time, shorter duration of patient positioning than double needles celiac neurolysis in abdominal malignancy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9391868 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93918682022-08-21 Single needle versus double needle celiac trunk neurolysis in abdominal malignancy pain management: a randomized controlled trial() Abdelghaffar, Nevert A. El-Rahmawy, Ghada F. Elmaddawy, Alaa El-Badrawy, Adel Braz J Anesthesiol Scientific Article BACKGROUND: Computerized tomography-guided celiac plexus neurolysis has become almost a safe technique to alleviate abdominal malignancy pain. We compared the single needle technique with changing patients’ position and the double needle technique using posterior anterocrural approach. METHODS: In Double Needles Celiac Neurolysis Group (n = 17), we used two needles posterior anterocrural technique injecting 12.5 mL phenol 10% on each side in prone position. In Single Needle Celiac Neurolysis Group (n = 17), we used single needle posterior anterocrural approach. 25 mL of phenol 10% was injected from left side while patients were in left lateral position then turned to right side. The monitoring parameters were failure block rate and duration of patient positioning, technique time, Visual Analog Scale, complications (hypotension, diarrhea, vomiting, hemorrhage, neurological damage and infection) and rescue analgesia. RESULTS: The failure block rate and duration of patient positioning significantly increased in double needles celiac neurolysis vs. single needle celiac neurolysis (30.8% vs. 0%; 13.8 ± 1.2 vs. 8.9 ± 1; p = 0.046, p ≤ 0.001 respectively). Also, the technique time increased significantly in double needles celiac neurolysis than single needle celiac neurolysis (24.5 ± 5.1 vs. 15.4 ± 1.8; p ≤ 0.001). No significant differences existed as regards Visual Analog Scale: double needles celiac neurolysis = 2 (0–5), 2 (0–4), 3 (0–6), 3 (2–6) and single needle celiac neurolysis = 3 (0–5), 2 (0–5), 2 (0–4), 4 (2–6) after 1 day, 1 week, 1 and 3 months respectively. However, Visual Analog Scale in each group reduced significantly compared with basal values (p ≤ 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences as regards rescue analgesia and complications (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Single needle celiac neurolysis with changing patients’ position has less failure block rate, less procedure time, shorter duration of patient positioning than double needles celiac neurolysis in abdominal malignancy. Elsevier 2019-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9391868/ /pubmed/31080008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2019.01.001 Text en © 2019 Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Scientific Article Abdelghaffar, Nevert A. El-Rahmawy, Ghada F. Elmaddawy, Alaa El-Badrawy, Adel Single needle versus double needle celiac trunk neurolysis in abdominal malignancy pain management: a randomized controlled trial() |
title | Single needle versus double needle celiac trunk neurolysis in abdominal malignancy pain management: a randomized controlled trial() |
title_full | Single needle versus double needle celiac trunk neurolysis in abdominal malignancy pain management: a randomized controlled trial() |
title_fullStr | Single needle versus double needle celiac trunk neurolysis in abdominal malignancy pain management: a randomized controlled trial() |
title_full_unstemmed | Single needle versus double needle celiac trunk neurolysis in abdominal malignancy pain management: a randomized controlled trial() |
title_short | Single needle versus double needle celiac trunk neurolysis in abdominal malignancy pain management: a randomized controlled trial() |
title_sort | single needle versus double needle celiac trunk neurolysis in abdominal malignancy pain management: a randomized controlled trial() |
topic | Scientific Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9391868/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31080008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2019.01.001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abdelghaffarneverta singleneedleversusdoubleneedleceliactrunkneurolysisinabdominalmalignancypainmanagementarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT elrahmawyghadaf singleneedleversusdoubleneedleceliactrunkneurolysisinabdominalmalignancypainmanagementarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT elmaddawyalaa singleneedleversusdoubleneedleceliactrunkneurolysisinabdominalmalignancypainmanagementarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT elbadrawyadel singleneedleversusdoubleneedleceliactrunkneurolysisinabdominalmalignancypainmanagementarandomizedcontrolledtrial |