Cargando…
Trends in Out-of-Pocket Costs for Naloxone by Drug Brand and Payer in the US, 2010-2018
IMPORTANCE: Improving access to naloxone is a critical component of the nation’s strategy to curb fatal overdoses in the opioid crisis. Standing or protocol orders, prescriptive authority laws, and immunity provisions have been passed by states to expand access, but less attention has been given to...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Medical Association
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9391964/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36200636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.2663 |
_version_ | 1784770970034110464 |
---|---|
author | Peet, Evan D. Powell, David Pacula, Rosalie Liccardo |
author_facet | Peet, Evan D. Powell, David Pacula, Rosalie Liccardo |
author_sort | Peet, Evan D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | IMPORTANCE: Improving access to naloxone is a critical component of the nation’s strategy to curb fatal overdoses in the opioid crisis. Standing or protocol orders, prescriptive authority laws, and immunity provisions have been passed by states to expand access, but less attention has been given to potential financial barriers to naloxone access. OBJECTIVE: To assess trends in out-of-pocket (OOP) costs for naloxone and examine variation in OOP costs by drug brand and payer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This observational study analyzed US naloxone claims data from Symphony Health and associated OOP costs for individuals filling naloxone prescriptions by drug brand and payer between January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2018. The data were analyzed from March 31, 2021, to April 12, 2022. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The main measures were trends in annual number of naloxone claims (overall, by payer, and by drug brand) and mean annual OOP costs per claim (overall, by payer, and by drug brand). RESULTS: Of 719 612 naloxone claims (172 894 generic naloxone, 501 568 Narcan, and 45 150 Evzio) for 2010 through 2018, the number of naloxone claims among insured patients began rapidly increasing after 2014; at the same time, the mean OOP cost of naloxone increased dramatically among the uninsured population. Comparing 2014 with 2018, the mean OOP cost of naloxone decreased by 26% among those with insurance but increased by 506% among uninsured patients. For the uninsured population, the impediment of cost was even larger for certain brands of the drug. In 2016, the mean OOP cost for Evzio among uninsured patients rose to $2136.37 (a 2429% increase relative to 2015) compared with the mean cost of generic naloxone, $72.88, and the cost of Narcan in its first year, $87.95. Throughout the period, the mean OOP costs paid by uninsured patients were higher for Evzio at $1089.17 (95% CI, $884.17-$1294.17) compared with $73.62 (95% CI, $69.24-$78.00) for Narcan and $67.99 (95% CI, $61.42-$74.56) for generic naloxone. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this observational study, the findings indicated that the OOP cost of naloxone had been an increasingly substantial barrier to naloxone access for uninsured patients, potentially limiting use among this population, which constituted approximately 20% of adults with opioid use disorder. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9391964 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | American Medical Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93919642022-09-06 Trends in Out-of-Pocket Costs for Naloxone by Drug Brand and Payer in the US, 2010-2018 Peet, Evan D. Powell, David Pacula, Rosalie Liccardo JAMA Health Forum Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: Improving access to naloxone is a critical component of the nation’s strategy to curb fatal overdoses in the opioid crisis. Standing or protocol orders, prescriptive authority laws, and immunity provisions have been passed by states to expand access, but less attention has been given to potential financial barriers to naloxone access. OBJECTIVE: To assess trends in out-of-pocket (OOP) costs for naloxone and examine variation in OOP costs by drug brand and payer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This observational study analyzed US naloxone claims data from Symphony Health and associated OOP costs for individuals filling naloxone prescriptions by drug brand and payer between January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2018. The data were analyzed from March 31, 2021, to April 12, 2022. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The main measures were trends in annual number of naloxone claims (overall, by payer, and by drug brand) and mean annual OOP costs per claim (overall, by payer, and by drug brand). RESULTS: Of 719 612 naloxone claims (172 894 generic naloxone, 501 568 Narcan, and 45 150 Evzio) for 2010 through 2018, the number of naloxone claims among insured patients began rapidly increasing after 2014; at the same time, the mean OOP cost of naloxone increased dramatically among the uninsured population. Comparing 2014 with 2018, the mean OOP cost of naloxone decreased by 26% among those with insurance but increased by 506% among uninsured patients. For the uninsured population, the impediment of cost was even larger for certain brands of the drug. In 2016, the mean OOP cost for Evzio among uninsured patients rose to $2136.37 (a 2429% increase relative to 2015) compared with the mean cost of generic naloxone, $72.88, and the cost of Narcan in its first year, $87.95. Throughout the period, the mean OOP costs paid by uninsured patients were higher for Evzio at $1089.17 (95% CI, $884.17-$1294.17) compared with $73.62 (95% CI, $69.24-$78.00) for Narcan and $67.99 (95% CI, $61.42-$74.56) for generic naloxone. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this observational study, the findings indicated that the OOP cost of naloxone had been an increasingly substantial barrier to naloxone access for uninsured patients, potentially limiting use among this population, which constituted approximately 20% of adults with opioid use disorder. American Medical Association 2022-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9391964/ /pubmed/36200636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.2663 Text en Copyright 2022 Peet ED et al. JAMA Health Forum. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. |
spellingShingle | Original Investigation Peet, Evan D. Powell, David Pacula, Rosalie Liccardo Trends in Out-of-Pocket Costs for Naloxone by Drug Brand and Payer in the US, 2010-2018 |
title | Trends in Out-of-Pocket Costs for Naloxone by Drug Brand and Payer in the US, 2010-2018 |
title_full | Trends in Out-of-Pocket Costs for Naloxone by Drug Brand and Payer in the US, 2010-2018 |
title_fullStr | Trends in Out-of-Pocket Costs for Naloxone by Drug Brand and Payer in the US, 2010-2018 |
title_full_unstemmed | Trends in Out-of-Pocket Costs for Naloxone by Drug Brand and Payer in the US, 2010-2018 |
title_short | Trends in Out-of-Pocket Costs for Naloxone by Drug Brand and Payer in the US, 2010-2018 |
title_sort | trends in out-of-pocket costs for naloxone by drug brand and payer in the us, 2010-2018 |
topic | Original Investigation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9391964/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36200636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.2663 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT peetevand trendsinoutofpocketcostsfornaloxonebydrugbrandandpayerintheus20102018 AT powelldavid trendsinoutofpocketcostsfornaloxonebydrugbrandandpayerintheus20102018 AT pacularosalieliccardo trendsinoutofpocketcostsfornaloxonebydrugbrandandpayerintheus20102018 |