Cargando…
Is it cost effective to use a 2% chlorhexidine wipes bath to reduce central-line associated blood stream infection? A quasi-experimental study
BACKGROUND: Bathing with 2% chlorhexidine (CHG) wipes is an important measure regarding infection prevention in critically ill patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of CHG wipes bath to prevent central-line associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) in critically ill patients and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9392115/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33515494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjid.2021.101538 |
_version_ | 1784771000491048960 |
---|---|
author | Feriani, Diego Souza, Ercilia Evangelista Carvalho, Larissa Gordilho Mutti Ibanes, Aline Santos Vasconcelos, Eliana Barbosa, Vera Lucia Kondo, Sandra Kiyomi Abboud, Cely S. |
author_facet | Feriani, Diego Souza, Ercilia Evangelista Carvalho, Larissa Gordilho Mutti Ibanes, Aline Santos Vasconcelos, Eliana Barbosa, Vera Lucia Kondo, Sandra Kiyomi Abboud, Cely S. |
author_sort | Feriani, Diego |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Bathing with 2% chlorhexidine (CHG) wipes is an important measure regarding infection prevention in critically ill patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of CHG wipes bath to prevent central-line associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) in critically ill patients and determine if such measure is cost-saving. METHODS: a quasi-experimental study, conducted from July 2017 to April 2019. Daily bath with 2% CHG was used in all patients at the unit in the intervention period. The following were evaluated: CLABSI incidence density in both periods, 30- day mortality, guided antimicrobials used to treat CLABSI and 2% CHG costs. RESULTS: CLABSI incidence density dropped from 8.69 to 1.83 per 1.000 central line-days (p = 0.001), mainly by Klebsiella pneumoniae Carbapenen Resistant (Kp-KPC) (p = 0.05). Costs with guided antimicrobials for the treatment in pre-intervention were US$ 46,114.36, and in the intervention period, US$ 4,177.50. The 2% CHG monthly cost was US$ 2,698.00, achieving 30% savings when comparing both periods. DISCUSSION: An expressive reduction of 79% in CLABSI incidence density was observed, mainly due to Kp-KPC infection and also a reduction in guided antimicrobial costs. CONCLUSIONS: Bathing with 2% CHG led to evident CLABSI reduction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9392115 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93921152022-08-23 Is it cost effective to use a 2% chlorhexidine wipes bath to reduce central-line associated blood stream infection? A quasi-experimental study Feriani, Diego Souza, Ercilia Evangelista Carvalho, Larissa Gordilho Mutti Ibanes, Aline Santos Vasconcelos, Eliana Barbosa, Vera Lucia Kondo, Sandra Kiyomi Abboud, Cely S. Braz J Infect Dis Original Article BACKGROUND: Bathing with 2% chlorhexidine (CHG) wipes is an important measure regarding infection prevention in critically ill patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of CHG wipes bath to prevent central-line associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) in critically ill patients and determine if such measure is cost-saving. METHODS: a quasi-experimental study, conducted from July 2017 to April 2019. Daily bath with 2% CHG was used in all patients at the unit in the intervention period. The following were evaluated: CLABSI incidence density in both periods, 30- day mortality, guided antimicrobials used to treat CLABSI and 2% CHG costs. RESULTS: CLABSI incidence density dropped from 8.69 to 1.83 per 1.000 central line-days (p = 0.001), mainly by Klebsiella pneumoniae Carbapenen Resistant (Kp-KPC) (p = 0.05). Costs with guided antimicrobials for the treatment in pre-intervention were US$ 46,114.36, and in the intervention period, US$ 4,177.50. The 2% CHG monthly cost was US$ 2,698.00, achieving 30% savings when comparing both periods. DISCUSSION: An expressive reduction of 79% in CLABSI incidence density was observed, mainly due to Kp-KPC infection and also a reduction in guided antimicrobial costs. CONCLUSIONS: Bathing with 2% CHG led to evident CLABSI reduction. Elsevier 2021-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9392115/ /pubmed/33515494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjid.2021.101538 Text en © 2021 Sociedade Brasileira de Infectologia. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Feriani, Diego Souza, Ercilia Evangelista Carvalho, Larissa Gordilho Mutti Ibanes, Aline Santos Vasconcelos, Eliana Barbosa, Vera Lucia Kondo, Sandra Kiyomi Abboud, Cely S. Is it cost effective to use a 2% chlorhexidine wipes bath to reduce central-line associated blood stream infection? A quasi-experimental study |
title | Is it cost effective to use a 2% chlorhexidine wipes bath to reduce central-line associated blood stream infection? A quasi-experimental study |
title_full | Is it cost effective to use a 2% chlorhexidine wipes bath to reduce central-line associated blood stream infection? A quasi-experimental study |
title_fullStr | Is it cost effective to use a 2% chlorhexidine wipes bath to reduce central-line associated blood stream infection? A quasi-experimental study |
title_full_unstemmed | Is it cost effective to use a 2% chlorhexidine wipes bath to reduce central-line associated blood stream infection? A quasi-experimental study |
title_short | Is it cost effective to use a 2% chlorhexidine wipes bath to reduce central-line associated blood stream infection? A quasi-experimental study |
title_sort | is it cost effective to use a 2% chlorhexidine wipes bath to reduce central-line associated blood stream infection? a quasi-experimental study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9392115/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33515494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjid.2021.101538 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ferianidiego isitcosteffectivetousea2chlorhexidinewipesbathtoreducecentrallineassociatedbloodstreaminfectionaquasiexperimentalstudy AT souzaerciliaevangelista isitcosteffectivetousea2chlorhexidinewipesbathtoreducecentrallineassociatedbloodstreaminfectionaquasiexperimentalstudy AT carvalholarissagordilhomutti isitcosteffectivetousea2chlorhexidinewipesbathtoreducecentrallineassociatedbloodstreaminfectionaquasiexperimentalstudy AT ibanesalinesantos isitcosteffectivetousea2chlorhexidinewipesbathtoreducecentrallineassociatedbloodstreaminfectionaquasiexperimentalstudy AT vasconceloseliana isitcosteffectivetousea2chlorhexidinewipesbathtoreducecentrallineassociatedbloodstreaminfectionaquasiexperimentalstudy AT barbosaveralucia isitcosteffectivetousea2chlorhexidinewipesbathtoreducecentrallineassociatedbloodstreaminfectionaquasiexperimentalstudy AT kondosandrakiyomi isitcosteffectivetousea2chlorhexidinewipesbathtoreducecentrallineassociatedbloodstreaminfectionaquasiexperimentalstudy AT abboudcelys isitcosteffectivetousea2chlorhexidinewipesbathtoreducecentrallineassociatedbloodstreaminfectionaquasiexperimentalstudy |