Cargando…

Lidocaine spray 10% prior to intravenous catheterisation in dogs

A common and to some degree painful procedure in veterinary practice is to insert an intra-venous catheter. In both human and veterinary medicine, a topical mixture of lidocaine and prilocaine (EMLA cream) has shown to reduce the pain, however a period of 60 min between application and initiation of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hoeberg, Emma, Loken Kolstad, Tonje, Moller, Liisa Martine, Rosvold, Silje Kristine, Heggernes Softeland, Maren, Haga, Henning Andreas, Lervik, Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9392236/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35987686
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13028-022-00639-w
_version_ 1784771018725785600
author Hoeberg, Emma
Loken Kolstad, Tonje
Moller, Liisa Martine
Rosvold, Silje Kristine
Heggernes Softeland, Maren
Haga, Henning Andreas
Lervik, Andreas
author_facet Hoeberg, Emma
Loken Kolstad, Tonje
Moller, Liisa Martine
Rosvold, Silje Kristine
Heggernes Softeland, Maren
Haga, Henning Andreas
Lervik, Andreas
author_sort Hoeberg, Emma
collection PubMed
description A common and to some degree painful procedure in veterinary practice is to insert an intra-venous catheter. In both human and veterinary medicine, a topical mixture of lidocaine and prilocaine (EMLA cream) has shown to reduce the pain, however a period of 60 min between application and initiation of the procedure is recommended. This time lapse is not always suitable for clinical practise and a shorter time before anaesthetic effect is therefore desirable. Lidocaine has a shorter time lapse (1–3 min) when used on mucus membrane; however, the effect of lidocaine for desensitization of skin has shown variable results in humans. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of topical lidocaine spray 10% on the response to placement of venous catheters in dogs. Topical lidocaine spray 10% or NaCl 0.9% was administered prior to placing an intravenous catheter in the cephalic vein. A cross-over of treatment with 2 h wash out period was used before placing a catheter in the opposite cephalic vein. The procedure was video recorded and the dogs’ responses were later scored by three persons blinded to treatment using a visual analogue scale. The VAS scores were normalised and the mean difference between treatments were compared using Wilcox signed-rank test. This study could not find a statistical difference between the treatments (P = 0.1763) and could conclude that no significant difference in response to intravenous catheterisation was found between application of NaCl 0.9% or lidocaine 10% prior to the procedure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9392236
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93922362022-08-21 Lidocaine spray 10% prior to intravenous catheterisation in dogs Hoeberg, Emma Loken Kolstad, Tonje Moller, Liisa Martine Rosvold, Silje Kristine Heggernes Softeland, Maren Haga, Henning Andreas Lervik, Andreas Acta Vet Scand Brief Communication A common and to some degree painful procedure in veterinary practice is to insert an intra-venous catheter. In both human and veterinary medicine, a topical mixture of lidocaine and prilocaine (EMLA cream) has shown to reduce the pain, however a period of 60 min between application and initiation of the procedure is recommended. This time lapse is not always suitable for clinical practise and a shorter time before anaesthetic effect is therefore desirable. Lidocaine has a shorter time lapse (1–3 min) when used on mucus membrane; however, the effect of lidocaine for desensitization of skin has shown variable results in humans. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of topical lidocaine spray 10% on the response to placement of venous catheters in dogs. Topical lidocaine spray 10% or NaCl 0.9% was administered prior to placing an intravenous catheter in the cephalic vein. A cross-over of treatment with 2 h wash out period was used before placing a catheter in the opposite cephalic vein. The procedure was video recorded and the dogs’ responses were later scored by three persons blinded to treatment using a visual analogue scale. The VAS scores were normalised and the mean difference between treatments were compared using Wilcox signed-rank test. This study could not find a statistical difference between the treatments (P = 0.1763) and could conclude that no significant difference in response to intravenous catheterisation was found between application of NaCl 0.9% or lidocaine 10% prior to the procedure. BioMed Central 2022-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9392236/ /pubmed/35987686 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13028-022-00639-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Brief Communication
Hoeberg, Emma
Loken Kolstad, Tonje
Moller, Liisa Martine
Rosvold, Silje Kristine
Heggernes Softeland, Maren
Haga, Henning Andreas
Lervik, Andreas
Lidocaine spray 10% prior to intravenous catheterisation in dogs
title Lidocaine spray 10% prior to intravenous catheterisation in dogs
title_full Lidocaine spray 10% prior to intravenous catheterisation in dogs
title_fullStr Lidocaine spray 10% prior to intravenous catheterisation in dogs
title_full_unstemmed Lidocaine spray 10% prior to intravenous catheterisation in dogs
title_short Lidocaine spray 10% prior to intravenous catheterisation in dogs
title_sort lidocaine spray 10% prior to intravenous catheterisation in dogs
topic Brief Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9392236/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35987686
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13028-022-00639-w
work_keys_str_mv AT hoebergemma lidocainespray10priortointravenouscatheterisationindogs
AT lokenkolstadtonje lidocainespray10priortointravenouscatheterisationindogs
AT mollerliisamartine lidocainespray10priortointravenouscatheterisationindogs
AT rosvoldsiljekristine lidocainespray10priortointravenouscatheterisationindogs
AT heggernessoftelandmaren lidocainespray10priortointravenouscatheterisationindogs
AT hagahenningandreas lidocainespray10priortointravenouscatheterisationindogs
AT lervikandreas lidocainespray10priortointravenouscatheterisationindogs