Cargando…
Machine learning-based prediction of fainting during blood donations using donor properties and weather data as features
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Fainting is a well-known side effect of blood donation. Such adverse experiences can diminish the return rate for further blood donations. Identifying factors associated with fainting could help prevent adverse incidents during blood donation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data o...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9392313/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35987636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-022-01971-x |
_version_ | 1784771035737882624 |
---|---|
author | Suessner, Susanne Niklas, Norbert Bodenhofer, Ulrich Meier, Jens |
author_facet | Suessner, Susanne Niklas, Norbert Bodenhofer, Ulrich Meier, Jens |
author_sort | Suessner, Susanne |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Fainting is a well-known side effect of blood donation. Such adverse experiences can diminish the return rate for further blood donations. Identifying factors associated with fainting could help prevent adverse incidents during blood donation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data of 85,040 blood donations from whole blood and apheresis donors within four consecutive years were included in this retrospective study. Seven different machine learning models (random forests, artificial neural networks, XGradient Boosting, AdaBoost, logistic regression, K nearest neighbors, and support vector machines) for predicting fainting during blood donation were established. The used features derived from the data obtained from the questionnaire every donor has to fill in before the donation and weather data of the day of the donation. RESULTS: One thousand seven hundred fifteen fainting reactions were observed in 228 846 blood donations from 88,003 donors over a study period of 48 months. Similar values for all machine learning algorithms investigated for NPV, PPV, AUC, and F1-score were obtained. In general, NPV was above 0.996, whereas PPV was below 0.03. AUC and F1-score were close to 0.9 for all models. Essential features predicting fainting during blood donation were systolic and diastolic blood pressure and ambient temperature, humidity, and barometric pressure. CONCLUSION: Machine-learning algorithms can establish prediction models of fainting in blood donors. These new tools can reduce adverse reactions during blood donation and improve donor safety and minimize negative associations relating to blood donation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9392313 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93923132022-08-21 Machine learning-based prediction of fainting during blood donations using donor properties and weather data as features Suessner, Susanne Niklas, Norbert Bodenhofer, Ulrich Meier, Jens BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Fainting is a well-known side effect of blood donation. Such adverse experiences can diminish the return rate for further blood donations. Identifying factors associated with fainting could help prevent adverse incidents during blood donation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data of 85,040 blood donations from whole blood and apheresis donors within four consecutive years were included in this retrospective study. Seven different machine learning models (random forests, artificial neural networks, XGradient Boosting, AdaBoost, logistic regression, K nearest neighbors, and support vector machines) for predicting fainting during blood donation were established. The used features derived from the data obtained from the questionnaire every donor has to fill in before the donation and weather data of the day of the donation. RESULTS: One thousand seven hundred fifteen fainting reactions were observed in 228 846 blood donations from 88,003 donors over a study period of 48 months. Similar values for all machine learning algorithms investigated for NPV, PPV, AUC, and F1-score were obtained. In general, NPV was above 0.996, whereas PPV was below 0.03. AUC and F1-score were close to 0.9 for all models. Essential features predicting fainting during blood donation were systolic and diastolic blood pressure and ambient temperature, humidity, and barometric pressure. CONCLUSION: Machine-learning algorithms can establish prediction models of fainting in blood donors. These new tools can reduce adverse reactions during blood donation and improve donor safety and minimize negative associations relating to blood donation. BioMed Central 2022-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9392313/ /pubmed/35987636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-022-01971-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Suessner, Susanne Niklas, Norbert Bodenhofer, Ulrich Meier, Jens Machine learning-based prediction of fainting during blood donations using donor properties and weather data as features |
title | Machine learning-based prediction of fainting during blood donations using donor properties and weather data as features |
title_full | Machine learning-based prediction of fainting during blood donations using donor properties and weather data as features |
title_fullStr | Machine learning-based prediction of fainting during blood donations using donor properties and weather data as features |
title_full_unstemmed | Machine learning-based prediction of fainting during blood donations using donor properties and weather data as features |
title_short | Machine learning-based prediction of fainting during blood donations using donor properties and weather data as features |
title_sort | machine learning-based prediction of fainting during blood donations using donor properties and weather data as features |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9392313/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35987636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-022-01971-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT suessnersusanne machinelearningbasedpredictionoffaintingduringblooddonationsusingdonorpropertiesandweatherdataasfeatures AT niklasnorbert machinelearningbasedpredictionoffaintingduringblooddonationsusingdonorpropertiesandweatherdataasfeatures AT bodenhoferulrich machinelearningbasedpredictionoffaintingduringblooddonationsusingdonorpropertiesandweatherdataasfeatures AT meierjens machinelearningbasedpredictionoffaintingduringblooddonationsusingdonorpropertiesandweatherdataasfeatures |