Cargando…

Machine learning-based prediction of fainting during blood donations using donor properties and weather data as features

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Fainting is a well-known side effect of blood donation. Such adverse experiences can diminish the return rate for further blood donations. Identifying factors associated with fainting could help prevent adverse incidents during blood donation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Suessner, Susanne, Niklas, Norbert, Bodenhofer, Ulrich, Meier, Jens
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9392313/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35987636
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-022-01971-x
_version_ 1784771035737882624
author Suessner, Susanne
Niklas, Norbert
Bodenhofer, Ulrich
Meier, Jens
author_facet Suessner, Susanne
Niklas, Norbert
Bodenhofer, Ulrich
Meier, Jens
author_sort Suessner, Susanne
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Fainting is a well-known side effect of blood donation. Such adverse experiences can diminish the return rate for further blood donations. Identifying factors associated with fainting could help prevent adverse incidents during blood donation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data of 85,040 blood donations from whole blood and apheresis donors within four consecutive years were included in this retrospective study. Seven different machine learning models (random forests, artificial neural networks, XGradient Boosting, AdaBoost, logistic regression, K nearest neighbors, and support vector machines) for predicting fainting during blood donation were established. The used features derived from the data obtained from the questionnaire every donor has to fill in before the donation and weather data of the day of the donation. RESULTS: One thousand seven hundred fifteen fainting reactions were observed in 228 846 blood donations from 88,003 donors over a study period of 48 months. Similar values for all machine learning algorithms investigated for NPV, PPV, AUC, and F1-score were obtained. In general, NPV was above 0.996, whereas PPV was below 0.03. AUC and F1-score were close to 0.9 for all models. Essential features predicting fainting during blood donation were systolic and diastolic blood pressure and ambient temperature, humidity, and barometric pressure. CONCLUSION: Machine-learning algorithms can establish prediction models of fainting in blood donors. These new tools can reduce adverse reactions during blood donation and improve donor safety and minimize negative associations relating to blood donation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9392313
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93923132022-08-21 Machine learning-based prediction of fainting during blood donations using donor properties and weather data as features Suessner, Susanne Niklas, Norbert Bodenhofer, Ulrich Meier, Jens BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Fainting is a well-known side effect of blood donation. Such adverse experiences can diminish the return rate for further blood donations. Identifying factors associated with fainting could help prevent adverse incidents during blood donation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data of 85,040 blood donations from whole blood and apheresis donors within four consecutive years were included in this retrospective study. Seven different machine learning models (random forests, artificial neural networks, XGradient Boosting, AdaBoost, logistic regression, K nearest neighbors, and support vector machines) for predicting fainting during blood donation were established. The used features derived from the data obtained from the questionnaire every donor has to fill in before the donation and weather data of the day of the donation. RESULTS: One thousand seven hundred fifteen fainting reactions were observed in 228 846 blood donations from 88,003 donors over a study period of 48 months. Similar values for all machine learning algorithms investigated for NPV, PPV, AUC, and F1-score were obtained. In general, NPV was above 0.996, whereas PPV was below 0.03. AUC and F1-score were close to 0.9 for all models. Essential features predicting fainting during blood donation were systolic and diastolic blood pressure and ambient temperature, humidity, and barometric pressure. CONCLUSION: Machine-learning algorithms can establish prediction models of fainting in blood donors. These new tools can reduce adverse reactions during blood donation and improve donor safety and minimize negative associations relating to blood donation. BioMed Central 2022-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9392313/ /pubmed/35987636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-022-01971-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Suessner, Susanne
Niklas, Norbert
Bodenhofer, Ulrich
Meier, Jens
Machine learning-based prediction of fainting during blood donations using donor properties and weather data as features
title Machine learning-based prediction of fainting during blood donations using donor properties and weather data as features
title_full Machine learning-based prediction of fainting during blood donations using donor properties and weather data as features
title_fullStr Machine learning-based prediction of fainting during blood donations using donor properties and weather data as features
title_full_unstemmed Machine learning-based prediction of fainting during blood donations using donor properties and weather data as features
title_short Machine learning-based prediction of fainting during blood donations using donor properties and weather data as features
title_sort machine learning-based prediction of fainting during blood donations using donor properties and weather data as features
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9392313/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35987636
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-022-01971-x
work_keys_str_mv AT suessnersusanne machinelearningbasedpredictionoffaintingduringblooddonationsusingdonorpropertiesandweatherdataasfeatures
AT niklasnorbert machinelearningbasedpredictionoffaintingduringblooddonationsusingdonorpropertiesandweatherdataasfeatures
AT bodenhoferulrich machinelearningbasedpredictionoffaintingduringblooddonationsusingdonorpropertiesandweatherdataasfeatures
AT meierjens machinelearningbasedpredictionoffaintingduringblooddonationsusingdonorpropertiesandweatherdataasfeatures