Cargando…

Comparing KTP and CO(2) laser excision for recurrent respiratory papillomatosis: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE: The CO(2) laser and 532 nm potassium titanyl phosphate (KTP) laser have been applied to treat recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (RRP). This systematic review sought to compare outcome differences between these two methods. DATA SOURCES: Embase, Web of Science, PubMed, and the Cochrane...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Jimin, Xie, Zhongcheng, Seyler, Barnabas C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9392380/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36000042
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.871
_version_ 1784771048838791168
author Yang, Jimin
Xie, Zhongcheng
Seyler, Barnabas C.
author_facet Yang, Jimin
Xie, Zhongcheng
Seyler, Barnabas C.
author_sort Yang, Jimin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The CO(2) laser and 532 nm potassium titanyl phosphate (KTP) laser have been applied to treat recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (RRP). This systematic review sought to compare outcome differences between these two methods. DATA SOURCES: Embase, Web of Science, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library. REVIEW METHODS: CO(2) laser and KTP laser studies were obtained by keyword searches of four authoritative medical databases. Articles were screened and retained when conforming to inclusion criteria. The primary outcome was cure rate; the secondary outcomes were recurrence, death, remission, clearance, and human papillomavirus (HPV)‐detected rates, as well as laser effectiveness rates. Postoperative complications rate was the safety outcome measure. All outcomes were summarized within the CO(2) and KTP groups, with results statistically compared (p < .05). RESULTS: Overall, the cure rates were 87.25% (KTP group) and 75.98% (CO(2) group; p < .05). Complication rates significantly differed between the KTP (2.32%) and CO(2) (17.71%) groups (p < .0001). There was a relatively higher but not significant difference in the recurrence rates between the CO(2) (18.6%) and KTP (10.87%) groups (p = .1595). The CO(2) group remission rate was considerably lower (38.9%) than the KTP group (88.46%, p < .0001). HPV‐detected and clearance rates were only reported for the CO(2) group. The bias risks were 13.1 ± 1.45 (CO(2)) and 13.6 ± 1.52 (KTP) for the two groups, indicating evidence was of fair quality. CONCLUSION: Overall, KTP laser excision showed significantly better postoperative clinical outcomes than the CO(2) laser, with a lower failure rate. Available fair‐quality evidence suggests KTP laser excision might be better for treating RRP. Nevertheless, more high‐quality randomized controlled studies are needed to compare these two surgical techniques, particularly in terms of reporting functional data such as vocal outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9392380
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93923802022-08-22 Comparing KTP and CO(2) laser excision for recurrent respiratory papillomatosis: A systematic review Yang, Jimin Xie, Zhongcheng Seyler, Barnabas C. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol Comprehensive (General) Otolaryngology OBJECTIVE: The CO(2) laser and 532 nm potassium titanyl phosphate (KTP) laser have been applied to treat recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (RRP). This systematic review sought to compare outcome differences between these two methods. DATA SOURCES: Embase, Web of Science, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library. REVIEW METHODS: CO(2) laser and KTP laser studies were obtained by keyword searches of four authoritative medical databases. Articles were screened and retained when conforming to inclusion criteria. The primary outcome was cure rate; the secondary outcomes were recurrence, death, remission, clearance, and human papillomavirus (HPV)‐detected rates, as well as laser effectiveness rates. Postoperative complications rate was the safety outcome measure. All outcomes were summarized within the CO(2) and KTP groups, with results statistically compared (p < .05). RESULTS: Overall, the cure rates were 87.25% (KTP group) and 75.98% (CO(2) group; p < .05). Complication rates significantly differed between the KTP (2.32%) and CO(2) (17.71%) groups (p < .0001). There was a relatively higher but not significant difference in the recurrence rates between the CO(2) (18.6%) and KTP (10.87%) groups (p = .1595). The CO(2) group remission rate was considerably lower (38.9%) than the KTP group (88.46%, p < .0001). HPV‐detected and clearance rates were only reported for the CO(2) group. The bias risks were 13.1 ± 1.45 (CO(2)) and 13.6 ± 1.52 (KTP) for the two groups, indicating evidence was of fair quality. CONCLUSION: Overall, KTP laser excision showed significantly better postoperative clinical outcomes than the CO(2) laser, with a lower failure rate. Available fair‐quality evidence suggests KTP laser excision might be better for treating RRP. Nevertheless, more high‐quality randomized controlled studies are needed to compare these two surgical techniques, particularly in terms of reporting functional data such as vocal outcomes. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9392380/ /pubmed/36000042 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.871 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Triological Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Comprehensive (General) Otolaryngology
Yang, Jimin
Xie, Zhongcheng
Seyler, Barnabas C.
Comparing KTP and CO(2) laser excision for recurrent respiratory papillomatosis: A systematic review
title Comparing KTP and CO(2) laser excision for recurrent respiratory papillomatosis: A systematic review
title_full Comparing KTP and CO(2) laser excision for recurrent respiratory papillomatosis: A systematic review
title_fullStr Comparing KTP and CO(2) laser excision for recurrent respiratory papillomatosis: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Comparing KTP and CO(2) laser excision for recurrent respiratory papillomatosis: A systematic review
title_short Comparing KTP and CO(2) laser excision for recurrent respiratory papillomatosis: A systematic review
title_sort comparing ktp and co(2) laser excision for recurrent respiratory papillomatosis: a systematic review
topic Comprehensive (General) Otolaryngology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9392380/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36000042
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.871
work_keys_str_mv AT yangjimin comparingktpandco2laserexcisionforrecurrentrespiratorypapillomatosisasystematicreview
AT xiezhongcheng comparingktpandco2laserexcisionforrecurrentrespiratorypapillomatosisasystematicreview
AT seylerbarnabasc comparingktpandco2laserexcisionforrecurrentrespiratorypapillomatosisasystematicreview