Cargando…

A window into eye movement dysfunction following mTBI: A scoping review of magnetic resonance imaging and eye tracking findings

Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), commonly known as concussion, is a complex neurobehavioral phenomenon affecting six in 1000 people globally each year. Symptoms last between days and years as microstructural damage to axons and neurometabolic changes result in brain network disruption. There is n...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McDonald, Matthew A., Tayebi, Maryam, McGeown, Joshua P., Kwon, Eryn E., Holdsworth, Samantha J, Danesh‐Meyer, Helen V
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9392543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35861623
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2714
_version_ 1784771085790609408
author McDonald, Matthew A.
Tayebi, Maryam
McGeown, Joshua P.
Kwon, Eryn E.
Holdsworth, Samantha J
Danesh‐Meyer, Helen V
author_facet McDonald, Matthew A.
Tayebi, Maryam
McGeown, Joshua P.
Kwon, Eryn E.
Holdsworth, Samantha J
Danesh‐Meyer, Helen V
author_sort McDonald, Matthew A.
collection PubMed
description Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), commonly known as concussion, is a complex neurobehavioral phenomenon affecting six in 1000 people globally each year. Symptoms last between days and years as microstructural damage to axons and neurometabolic changes result in brain network disruption. There is no clinically available objective biomarker to diagnose the severity of injury or monitor recovery. However, emerging evidence suggests eye movement dysfunction (e.g., saccades and smooth pursuits) in patients with mTBI. Patients with a higher symptom burden and prolonged recovery time following injury may show higher degrees of eye movement dysfunction. Likewise, recent advances in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have revealed both white matter tract damage and functional network alterations in mTBI patients, which involve areas responsible for the ocular motor control. This scoping review is presented in three sections: Section 1 explores the anatomical control of eye movements to aid the reader with interpreting the discussion in subsequent sections. Section 2 examines the relationship between abnormal MRI findings and eye tracking after mTBI based on the available evidence. Finally, Section 3 communicates gaps in our knowledge about MRI and eye tracking, which should be addressed in order to substantiate this emerging field.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9392543
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93925432022-08-24 A window into eye movement dysfunction following mTBI: A scoping review of magnetic resonance imaging and eye tracking findings McDonald, Matthew A. Tayebi, Maryam McGeown, Joshua P. Kwon, Eryn E. Holdsworth, Samantha J Danesh‐Meyer, Helen V Brain Behav Reviews Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), commonly known as concussion, is a complex neurobehavioral phenomenon affecting six in 1000 people globally each year. Symptoms last between days and years as microstructural damage to axons and neurometabolic changes result in brain network disruption. There is no clinically available objective biomarker to diagnose the severity of injury or monitor recovery. However, emerging evidence suggests eye movement dysfunction (e.g., saccades and smooth pursuits) in patients with mTBI. Patients with a higher symptom burden and prolonged recovery time following injury may show higher degrees of eye movement dysfunction. Likewise, recent advances in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have revealed both white matter tract damage and functional network alterations in mTBI patients, which involve areas responsible for the ocular motor control. This scoping review is presented in three sections: Section 1 explores the anatomical control of eye movements to aid the reader with interpreting the discussion in subsequent sections. Section 2 examines the relationship between abnormal MRI findings and eye tracking after mTBI based on the available evidence. Finally, Section 3 communicates gaps in our knowledge about MRI and eye tracking, which should be addressed in order to substantiate this emerging field. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9392543/ /pubmed/35861623 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2714 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Reviews
McDonald, Matthew A.
Tayebi, Maryam
McGeown, Joshua P.
Kwon, Eryn E.
Holdsworth, Samantha J
Danesh‐Meyer, Helen V
A window into eye movement dysfunction following mTBI: A scoping review of magnetic resonance imaging and eye tracking findings
title A window into eye movement dysfunction following mTBI: A scoping review of magnetic resonance imaging and eye tracking findings
title_full A window into eye movement dysfunction following mTBI: A scoping review of magnetic resonance imaging and eye tracking findings
title_fullStr A window into eye movement dysfunction following mTBI: A scoping review of magnetic resonance imaging and eye tracking findings
title_full_unstemmed A window into eye movement dysfunction following mTBI: A scoping review of magnetic resonance imaging and eye tracking findings
title_short A window into eye movement dysfunction following mTBI: A scoping review of magnetic resonance imaging and eye tracking findings
title_sort window into eye movement dysfunction following mtbi: a scoping review of magnetic resonance imaging and eye tracking findings
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9392543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35861623
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2714
work_keys_str_mv AT mcdonaldmatthewa awindowintoeyemovementdysfunctionfollowingmtbiascopingreviewofmagneticresonanceimagingandeyetrackingfindings
AT tayebimaryam awindowintoeyemovementdysfunctionfollowingmtbiascopingreviewofmagneticresonanceimagingandeyetrackingfindings
AT mcgeownjoshuap awindowintoeyemovementdysfunctionfollowingmtbiascopingreviewofmagneticresonanceimagingandeyetrackingfindings
AT kwoneryne awindowintoeyemovementdysfunctionfollowingmtbiascopingreviewofmagneticresonanceimagingandeyetrackingfindings
AT holdsworthsamanthaj awindowintoeyemovementdysfunctionfollowingmtbiascopingreviewofmagneticresonanceimagingandeyetrackingfindings
AT daneshmeyerhelenv awindowintoeyemovementdysfunctionfollowingmtbiascopingreviewofmagneticresonanceimagingandeyetrackingfindings
AT mcdonaldmatthewa windowintoeyemovementdysfunctionfollowingmtbiascopingreviewofmagneticresonanceimagingandeyetrackingfindings
AT tayebimaryam windowintoeyemovementdysfunctionfollowingmtbiascopingreviewofmagneticresonanceimagingandeyetrackingfindings
AT mcgeownjoshuap windowintoeyemovementdysfunctionfollowingmtbiascopingreviewofmagneticresonanceimagingandeyetrackingfindings
AT kwoneryne windowintoeyemovementdysfunctionfollowingmtbiascopingreviewofmagneticresonanceimagingandeyetrackingfindings
AT holdsworthsamanthaj windowintoeyemovementdysfunctionfollowingmtbiascopingreviewofmagneticresonanceimagingandeyetrackingfindings
AT daneshmeyerhelenv windowintoeyemovementdysfunctionfollowingmtbiascopingreviewofmagneticresonanceimagingandeyetrackingfindings