Cargando…

Optimal Choice of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for HER2-Negative Breast Cancer: Clinical Insights

The neoadjuvant setting provides immense opportunities for translational research and drug development. The acceptance of pathological complete response (pCR) as a surrogate endpoint for clinical benefit has led to the widespread use of neoadjuvant treatment. Optimal neoadjuvant therapies are determ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lucas, Mairi W, Kelly, Catherine M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9393016/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35999966
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S341466
_version_ 1784771181248774144
author Lucas, Mairi W
Kelly, Catherine M
author_facet Lucas, Mairi W
Kelly, Catherine M
author_sort Lucas, Mairi W
collection PubMed
description The neoadjuvant setting provides immense opportunities for translational research and drug development. The acceptance of pathological complete response (pCR) as a surrogate endpoint for clinical benefit has led to the widespread use of neoadjuvant treatment. Optimal neoadjuvant therapies are determined based on their ability to achieve the highest rates of pCR. Predicted rates of pCR for triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) treated with sequential taxane/anthracycline regimens range from 35% to 48%. With the addition of a platinum agent pCR rates of 55% are predicted. Further increases have been observed with the addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors to this standard chemotherapy backbone. In the pivotal KEYNOTE-522 clinical trial pCR rates of 65% and 69% were reported for chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab in the overall and PD-L1-positive subgroup respectively. The role of the neoadjuvant chemotherapy is less clear in hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer. In general, HR–positive cancers have the least chance of achieving a pCR after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, especially if they are low-grade. If neoadjuvant chemotherapy is given for high-risk HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer, standard adjuvant anthracycline/taxane regimens are appropriate. Optimum endocrine therapy is the standard-of-care in the adjuvant setting regardless of pCR. There are several genomic signatures available to guide decisions regarding adjuvant chemotherapy use however these assays are not routinely used in the neoadjuvant setting. For high-risk patients meeting the criteria for the monarchE trial adjuvant abemaciclib in addition to endocrine therapy is associated with an improvement in disease free survival (DFS) at 3 years. Based on the OlympiA trial patients with germline BRCA mutations should be considered for adjuvant olaparib therapy. In this article we review neoadjuvant clinical trials that guide optimum treatment options for TNBC and HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9393016
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93930162022-08-22 Optimal Choice of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for HER2-Negative Breast Cancer: Clinical Insights Lucas, Mairi W Kelly, Catherine M Cancer Manag Res Review The neoadjuvant setting provides immense opportunities for translational research and drug development. The acceptance of pathological complete response (pCR) as a surrogate endpoint for clinical benefit has led to the widespread use of neoadjuvant treatment. Optimal neoadjuvant therapies are determined based on their ability to achieve the highest rates of pCR. Predicted rates of pCR for triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) treated with sequential taxane/anthracycline regimens range from 35% to 48%. With the addition of a platinum agent pCR rates of 55% are predicted. Further increases have been observed with the addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors to this standard chemotherapy backbone. In the pivotal KEYNOTE-522 clinical trial pCR rates of 65% and 69% were reported for chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab in the overall and PD-L1-positive subgroup respectively. The role of the neoadjuvant chemotherapy is less clear in hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer. In general, HR–positive cancers have the least chance of achieving a pCR after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, especially if they are low-grade. If neoadjuvant chemotherapy is given for high-risk HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer, standard adjuvant anthracycline/taxane regimens are appropriate. Optimum endocrine therapy is the standard-of-care in the adjuvant setting regardless of pCR. There are several genomic signatures available to guide decisions regarding adjuvant chemotherapy use however these assays are not routinely used in the neoadjuvant setting. For high-risk patients meeting the criteria for the monarchE trial adjuvant abemaciclib in addition to endocrine therapy is associated with an improvement in disease free survival (DFS) at 3 years. Based on the OlympiA trial patients with germline BRCA mutations should be considered for adjuvant olaparib therapy. In this article we review neoadjuvant clinical trials that guide optimum treatment options for TNBC and HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. Dove 2022-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9393016/ /pubmed/35999966 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S341466 Text en © 2022 Lucas and Kelly. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Review
Lucas, Mairi W
Kelly, Catherine M
Optimal Choice of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for HER2-Negative Breast Cancer: Clinical Insights
title Optimal Choice of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for HER2-Negative Breast Cancer: Clinical Insights
title_full Optimal Choice of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for HER2-Negative Breast Cancer: Clinical Insights
title_fullStr Optimal Choice of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for HER2-Negative Breast Cancer: Clinical Insights
title_full_unstemmed Optimal Choice of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for HER2-Negative Breast Cancer: Clinical Insights
title_short Optimal Choice of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for HER2-Negative Breast Cancer: Clinical Insights
title_sort optimal choice of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for her2-negative breast cancer: clinical insights
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9393016/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35999966
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S341466
work_keys_str_mv AT lucasmairiw optimalchoiceofneoadjuvantchemotherapyforher2negativebreastcancerclinicalinsights
AT kellycatherinem optimalchoiceofneoadjuvantchemotherapyforher2negativebreastcancerclinicalinsights