Cargando…

The use of a modified Delphi technique to develop a critical appraisal tool for clinical pharmacokinetic studies

BACKGROUND: Critical appraisal aids in assessing the quality of scientific literature, which is central to the practice of evidence-based medicine. Several tools and guidelines are available for critiquing and assessing the quality of specific study types. However, limited guidance exists for critic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Soliman, Alaa Bahaa Eldeen, Pawluk, Shane Ashley, Wilby, Kyle John, Rachid, Ousama
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9393138/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35307788
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-022-01390-y
_version_ 1784771205040963584
author Soliman, Alaa Bahaa Eldeen
Pawluk, Shane Ashley
Wilby, Kyle John
Rachid, Ousama
author_facet Soliman, Alaa Bahaa Eldeen
Pawluk, Shane Ashley
Wilby, Kyle John
Rachid, Ousama
author_sort Soliman, Alaa Bahaa Eldeen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Critical appraisal aids in assessing the quality of scientific literature, which is central to the practice of evidence-based medicine. Several tools and guidelines are available for critiquing and assessing the quality of specific study types. However, limited guidance exists for critical appraisal of clinical pharmacokinetic studies. AIM: We aimed to achieve experts’ consensus regarding the quality markers for clinical pharmacokinetic studies in an attempt to develop a critical appraisal tool. METHOD: Quality markers related to clinical pharmacokinetic studies, were derived from the published literature and categorized according to manuscript reporting domains (abstract, introduction/background, methodology, results, discussion, and conclusion). Questions that aid in appraising pharmacokinetic studies were formulated from these quality markers. Experts were involved in a modified Delphi process to achieve a consensus regarding the formulated questions. The proposed tool was pilot tested on 30 recently published clinical pharmacokinetic studies. Inter-observer agreement was measured to determine the reliability of the included items. RESULTS: Twenty-five experts consented to participate. Three rounds of a modified Delphi survey were required to generate a consensus for a 21-item tool aimed at appraising the quality of clinical pharmacokinetic studies. When applied to 30 recently published clinical pharmacokinetic studies, most items scored fair to moderate levels of agreement (61.90–95.24%). CONCLUSION: The clinical pharmacokinetic critical appraisal tool (CACPK) developed in this study consisted of 21 items aimed at helping an end-user to determine the quality of a pharmacokinetic study. Further studies are warranted to reaffirm the validity and reliability of the CACPK tool. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11096-022-01390-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9393138
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93931382022-08-23 The use of a modified Delphi technique to develop a critical appraisal tool for clinical pharmacokinetic studies Soliman, Alaa Bahaa Eldeen Pawluk, Shane Ashley Wilby, Kyle John Rachid, Ousama Int J Clin Pharm Research Article BACKGROUND: Critical appraisal aids in assessing the quality of scientific literature, which is central to the practice of evidence-based medicine. Several tools and guidelines are available for critiquing and assessing the quality of specific study types. However, limited guidance exists for critical appraisal of clinical pharmacokinetic studies. AIM: We aimed to achieve experts’ consensus regarding the quality markers for clinical pharmacokinetic studies in an attempt to develop a critical appraisal tool. METHOD: Quality markers related to clinical pharmacokinetic studies, were derived from the published literature and categorized according to manuscript reporting domains (abstract, introduction/background, methodology, results, discussion, and conclusion). Questions that aid in appraising pharmacokinetic studies were formulated from these quality markers. Experts were involved in a modified Delphi process to achieve a consensus regarding the formulated questions. The proposed tool was pilot tested on 30 recently published clinical pharmacokinetic studies. Inter-observer agreement was measured to determine the reliability of the included items. RESULTS: Twenty-five experts consented to participate. Three rounds of a modified Delphi survey were required to generate a consensus for a 21-item tool aimed at appraising the quality of clinical pharmacokinetic studies. When applied to 30 recently published clinical pharmacokinetic studies, most items scored fair to moderate levels of agreement (61.90–95.24%). CONCLUSION: The clinical pharmacokinetic critical appraisal tool (CACPK) developed in this study consisted of 21 items aimed at helping an end-user to determine the quality of a pharmacokinetic study. Further studies are warranted to reaffirm the validity and reliability of the CACPK tool. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11096-022-01390-y. Springer International Publishing 2022-03-20 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9393138/ /pubmed/35307788 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-022-01390-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Article
Soliman, Alaa Bahaa Eldeen
Pawluk, Shane Ashley
Wilby, Kyle John
Rachid, Ousama
The use of a modified Delphi technique to develop a critical appraisal tool for clinical pharmacokinetic studies
title The use of a modified Delphi technique to develop a critical appraisal tool for clinical pharmacokinetic studies
title_full The use of a modified Delphi technique to develop a critical appraisal tool for clinical pharmacokinetic studies
title_fullStr The use of a modified Delphi technique to develop a critical appraisal tool for clinical pharmacokinetic studies
title_full_unstemmed The use of a modified Delphi technique to develop a critical appraisal tool for clinical pharmacokinetic studies
title_short The use of a modified Delphi technique to develop a critical appraisal tool for clinical pharmacokinetic studies
title_sort use of a modified delphi technique to develop a critical appraisal tool for clinical pharmacokinetic studies
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9393138/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35307788
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-022-01390-y
work_keys_str_mv AT solimanalaabahaaeldeen theuseofamodifieddelphitechniquetodevelopacriticalappraisaltoolforclinicalpharmacokineticstudies
AT pawlukshaneashley theuseofamodifieddelphitechniquetodevelopacriticalappraisaltoolforclinicalpharmacokineticstudies
AT wilbykylejohn theuseofamodifieddelphitechniquetodevelopacriticalappraisaltoolforclinicalpharmacokineticstudies
AT rachidousama theuseofamodifieddelphitechniquetodevelopacriticalappraisaltoolforclinicalpharmacokineticstudies
AT solimanalaabahaaeldeen useofamodifieddelphitechniquetodevelopacriticalappraisaltoolforclinicalpharmacokineticstudies
AT pawlukshaneashley useofamodifieddelphitechniquetodevelopacriticalappraisaltoolforclinicalpharmacokineticstudies
AT wilbykylejohn useofamodifieddelphitechniquetodevelopacriticalappraisaltoolforclinicalpharmacokineticstudies
AT rachidousama useofamodifieddelphitechniquetodevelopacriticalappraisaltoolforclinicalpharmacokineticstudies