Cargando…

Development of the Manchester framework for the evaluation of emergency department pharmacy services

BACKGROUND: Many countries, including the United Kingdom, have established Emergency Department (ED) pharmacy services where some ED pharmacists now work as practitioners. They provide both traditional pharmaceutical care and novel practitioner care i.e. clinical examination, yet their impact on qua...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Greenwood, D, Tully, MP, Martin, S, Steinke, D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9393142/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35449350
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-022-01403-w
_version_ 1784771206008799232
author Greenwood, D
Tully, MP
Martin, S
Steinke, D
author_facet Greenwood, D
Tully, MP
Martin, S
Steinke, D
author_sort Greenwood, D
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Many countries, including the United Kingdom, have established Emergency Department (ED) pharmacy services where some ED pharmacists now work as practitioners. They provide both traditional pharmaceutical care and novel practitioner care i.e. clinical examination, yet their impact on quality of care is unknown. AIM: To develop a framework of structures, processes and potential outcome indicators to support evaluation of the quality of ED pharmacy services in future studies. METHOD: Framework components (structures, processes and potential outcome indicators) were identified in three ways: from a narrative review of relevant international literature, and separate panel meetings with ED pharmacists and then other ED healthcare professionals. Structures and processes were collated into categories developed iteratively throughout data collection, with outcome indicators collated into six domains of quality as proposed by the Institute of Medicine. These raw data were then processed e.g. outcome indicators screened for clarity i.e. those which explicitly stated what would be measured were included in the framework. RESULTS: A total of 190 structures, 533 processes, and 503 outcome indicators were identified. Through data processing a total of 153 outcome indicators were included in the final framework divided into the domains safe (32), effective (50), patient centred (18), timely (24), efficient (20) and equitable (9). CONCLUSION: The first framework specific to the quality evaluation ED pharmacy services, service evaluators should validate potential outcome indicators prior to their use. The minimum expected of a high-quality service should also be defined to enable interpretation of relevant measurements. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11096-022-01403-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9393142
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93931422022-08-23 Development of the Manchester framework for the evaluation of emergency department pharmacy services Greenwood, D Tully, MP Martin, S Steinke, D Int J Clin Pharm Research Article BACKGROUND: Many countries, including the United Kingdom, have established Emergency Department (ED) pharmacy services where some ED pharmacists now work as practitioners. They provide both traditional pharmaceutical care and novel practitioner care i.e. clinical examination, yet their impact on quality of care is unknown. AIM: To develop a framework of structures, processes and potential outcome indicators to support evaluation of the quality of ED pharmacy services in future studies. METHOD: Framework components (structures, processes and potential outcome indicators) were identified in three ways: from a narrative review of relevant international literature, and separate panel meetings with ED pharmacists and then other ED healthcare professionals. Structures and processes were collated into categories developed iteratively throughout data collection, with outcome indicators collated into six domains of quality as proposed by the Institute of Medicine. These raw data were then processed e.g. outcome indicators screened for clarity i.e. those which explicitly stated what would be measured were included in the framework. RESULTS: A total of 190 structures, 533 processes, and 503 outcome indicators were identified. Through data processing a total of 153 outcome indicators were included in the final framework divided into the domains safe (32), effective (50), patient centred (18), timely (24), efficient (20) and equitable (9). CONCLUSION: The first framework specific to the quality evaluation ED pharmacy services, service evaluators should validate potential outcome indicators prior to their use. The minimum expected of a high-quality service should also be defined to enable interpretation of relevant measurements. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11096-022-01403-w. Springer International Publishing 2022-04-21 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9393142/ /pubmed/35449350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-022-01403-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Article
Greenwood, D
Tully, MP
Martin, S
Steinke, D
Development of the Manchester framework for the evaluation of emergency department pharmacy services
title Development of the Manchester framework for the evaluation of emergency department pharmacy services
title_full Development of the Manchester framework for the evaluation of emergency department pharmacy services
title_fullStr Development of the Manchester framework for the evaluation of emergency department pharmacy services
title_full_unstemmed Development of the Manchester framework for the evaluation of emergency department pharmacy services
title_short Development of the Manchester framework for the evaluation of emergency department pharmacy services
title_sort development of the manchester framework for the evaluation of emergency department pharmacy services
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9393142/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35449350
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-022-01403-w
work_keys_str_mv AT greenwoodd developmentofthemanchesterframeworkfortheevaluationofemergencydepartmentpharmacyservices
AT tullymp developmentofthemanchesterframeworkfortheevaluationofemergencydepartmentpharmacyservices
AT martins developmentofthemanchesterframeworkfortheevaluationofemergencydepartmentpharmacyservices
AT steinked developmentofthemanchesterframeworkfortheevaluationofemergencydepartmentpharmacyservices