Cargando…

Comparison of Locking Plate Osteosynthesis versus Coracoclavicular Stabilization for Neer Type IIB Lateral Clavicle Fractures

BACKGROUND: The best option for the treatment of Neer type IIB lateral clavicle fractures remains controversial. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes and complications between pre-contoured locking plate osteosynthesis (PLPO) and coracoclavicular stabilization (CCS) using a TightRope for th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Beom-Soo, Kim, Du-Han, Choi, Byung-Chan, Cho, Chul-Hyun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Orthopaedic Association 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9393275/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36061845
http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios22080
_version_ 1784771236100833280
author Kim, Beom-Soo
Kim, Du-Han
Choi, Byung-Chan
Cho, Chul-Hyun
author_facet Kim, Beom-Soo
Kim, Du-Han
Choi, Byung-Chan
Cho, Chul-Hyun
author_sort Kim, Beom-Soo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The best option for the treatment of Neer type IIB lateral clavicle fractures remains controversial. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes and complications between pre-contoured locking plate osteosynthesis (PLPO) and coracoclavicular stabilization (CCS) using a TightRope for the treatment of type IIB fractures. METHODS: Forty-six consecutive type IIB fractures were treated with PLPO (17 cases) or CCS (29 cases). The mean follow-up period was 33.7 months (range, 12–144 months). Radiographic outcomes were evaluated using serial plain radiographs. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) score, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and subjective shoulder value (SSV). RESULTS: Of the 46 cases, complete bony union within 6 months after surgery was achieved in 42 cases (91.3%). The union rate was 100% (17/17) in the PLPO group and 86.2% (25/29) in the CCS group, showing a statistically significant difference (p = 0.043). No significant differences in terms of UCLA score (32.8 vs. 32.1), ASES score (93.2 vs. 90.8), or SSV (89.1% vs. 90.3%) were observed between the PLPO and CCS groups. The complication rates were 17.6% (3/17; 2 cases of screw breakage and 1 case of stiffness) in the PLPO group and 37.9% (11/29; 4 cases of nonunion, 3 cases of stiffness, 2 cases of skin irritation, 1 case of superficial infection, and 1 case of coracoid button migration) in the CCS group, showing no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05). Four cases with nonunion after CCS did not require reoperation because they had good to excellent clinical outcomes without radiographic progression. CONCLUSIONS: Although a higher nonunion rate was observed in the CCS group compared with the PLPO group, satisfactory clinical outcomes were obtained for both groups. Both techniques can be regarded as useful options for the treatment of Neer type IIB lateral clavicle fractures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9393275
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Korean Orthopaedic Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93932752022-09-01 Comparison of Locking Plate Osteosynthesis versus Coracoclavicular Stabilization for Neer Type IIB Lateral Clavicle Fractures Kim, Beom-Soo Kim, Du-Han Choi, Byung-Chan Cho, Chul-Hyun Clin Orthop Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: The best option for the treatment of Neer type IIB lateral clavicle fractures remains controversial. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes and complications between pre-contoured locking plate osteosynthesis (PLPO) and coracoclavicular stabilization (CCS) using a TightRope for the treatment of type IIB fractures. METHODS: Forty-six consecutive type IIB fractures were treated with PLPO (17 cases) or CCS (29 cases). The mean follow-up period was 33.7 months (range, 12–144 months). Radiographic outcomes were evaluated using serial plain radiographs. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) score, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and subjective shoulder value (SSV). RESULTS: Of the 46 cases, complete bony union within 6 months after surgery was achieved in 42 cases (91.3%). The union rate was 100% (17/17) in the PLPO group and 86.2% (25/29) in the CCS group, showing a statistically significant difference (p = 0.043). No significant differences in terms of UCLA score (32.8 vs. 32.1), ASES score (93.2 vs. 90.8), or SSV (89.1% vs. 90.3%) were observed between the PLPO and CCS groups. The complication rates were 17.6% (3/17; 2 cases of screw breakage and 1 case of stiffness) in the PLPO group and 37.9% (11/29; 4 cases of nonunion, 3 cases of stiffness, 2 cases of skin irritation, 1 case of superficial infection, and 1 case of coracoid button migration) in the CCS group, showing no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05). Four cases with nonunion after CCS did not require reoperation because they had good to excellent clinical outcomes without radiographic progression. CONCLUSIONS: Although a higher nonunion rate was observed in the CCS group compared with the PLPO group, satisfactory clinical outcomes were obtained for both groups. Both techniques can be regarded as useful options for the treatment of Neer type IIB lateral clavicle fractures. The Korean Orthopaedic Association 2022-09 2022-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9393275/ /pubmed/36061845 http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios22080 Text en Copyright © 2022 by The Korean Orthopaedic Association https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Beom-Soo
Kim, Du-Han
Choi, Byung-Chan
Cho, Chul-Hyun
Comparison of Locking Plate Osteosynthesis versus Coracoclavicular Stabilization for Neer Type IIB Lateral Clavicle Fractures
title Comparison of Locking Plate Osteosynthesis versus Coracoclavicular Stabilization for Neer Type IIB Lateral Clavicle Fractures
title_full Comparison of Locking Plate Osteosynthesis versus Coracoclavicular Stabilization for Neer Type IIB Lateral Clavicle Fractures
title_fullStr Comparison of Locking Plate Osteosynthesis versus Coracoclavicular Stabilization for Neer Type IIB Lateral Clavicle Fractures
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Locking Plate Osteosynthesis versus Coracoclavicular Stabilization for Neer Type IIB Lateral Clavicle Fractures
title_short Comparison of Locking Plate Osteosynthesis versus Coracoclavicular Stabilization for Neer Type IIB Lateral Clavicle Fractures
title_sort comparison of locking plate osteosynthesis versus coracoclavicular stabilization for neer type iib lateral clavicle fractures
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9393275/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36061845
http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios22080
work_keys_str_mv AT kimbeomsoo comparisonoflockingplateosteosynthesisversuscoracoclavicularstabilizationforneertypeiiblateralclaviclefractures
AT kimduhan comparisonoflockingplateosteosynthesisversuscoracoclavicularstabilizationforneertypeiiblateralclaviclefractures
AT choibyungchan comparisonoflockingplateosteosynthesisversuscoracoclavicularstabilizationforneertypeiiblateralclaviclefractures
AT chochulhyun comparisonoflockingplateosteosynthesisversuscoracoclavicularstabilizationforneertypeiiblateralclaviclefractures