Cargando…

Analysis of influencing factors of shear wave elastography of the superficial tissue: A phantom study

Shear wave elastography (SWE) is widely used in clinical work. But there is no standard protocol and operation specification for SWE acquisition methods, which impacts the diagnosis and clinical staging. This study aimed to investigate the influence factors of diameter, depth, and stiffness on SWE u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Qiyang, Shi, Baixue, Zheng, Yang, Hu, Xiangdong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9393305/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36004380
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.943844
_version_ 1784771243382145024
author Chen, Qiyang
Shi, Baixue
Zheng, Yang
Hu, Xiangdong
author_facet Chen, Qiyang
Shi, Baixue
Zheng, Yang
Hu, Xiangdong
author_sort Chen, Qiyang
collection PubMed
description Shear wave elastography (SWE) is widely used in clinical work. But there is no standard protocol and operation specification for SWE acquisition methods, which impacts the diagnosis and clinical staging. This study aimed to investigate the influence factors of diameter, depth, and stiffness on SWE using different probes at superficial depths and discuss SWE differences with two machines at superficial depths. We performed SWE on two elastic phantoms that each phantom contained six subjects with two stiffness (41.06 ± 4.62 kpa and 57.30 ± 4.31 kpa), three diameters (10, 15, and 18 mm), and two depths (15 and 25 mm). A total of 240 measurements were obtained by using two ultrasound machines (SuperSonic Imagine Aixplorer and Mindray Resona 7) and 4 probes (SL15-4 and SL10-2, L11-3, and L14-5). The measurements were compared among 4 probes, 3 diameters, and 2 depths. There was no significant difference in SWE measurements among the probes from the same machine. The SWE measurements were affected by diameter, and the degree of influence was related to the stiffness. The SWE measurements were unaffected at a 15–25 mm depth range.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9393305
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93933052022-08-23 Analysis of influencing factors of shear wave elastography of the superficial tissue: A phantom study Chen, Qiyang Shi, Baixue Zheng, Yang Hu, Xiangdong Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine Shear wave elastography (SWE) is widely used in clinical work. But there is no standard protocol and operation specification for SWE acquisition methods, which impacts the diagnosis and clinical staging. This study aimed to investigate the influence factors of diameter, depth, and stiffness on SWE using different probes at superficial depths and discuss SWE differences with two machines at superficial depths. We performed SWE on two elastic phantoms that each phantom contained six subjects with two stiffness (41.06 ± 4.62 kpa and 57.30 ± 4.31 kpa), three diameters (10, 15, and 18 mm), and two depths (15 and 25 mm). A total of 240 measurements were obtained by using two ultrasound machines (SuperSonic Imagine Aixplorer and Mindray Resona 7) and 4 probes (SL15-4 and SL10-2, L11-3, and L14-5). The measurements were compared among 4 probes, 3 diameters, and 2 depths. There was no significant difference in SWE measurements among the probes from the same machine. The SWE measurements were affected by diameter, and the degree of influence was related to the stiffness. The SWE measurements were unaffected at a 15–25 mm depth range. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9393305/ /pubmed/36004380 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.943844 Text en Copyright © 2022 Chen, Shi, Zheng and Hu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Chen, Qiyang
Shi, Baixue
Zheng, Yang
Hu, Xiangdong
Analysis of influencing factors of shear wave elastography of the superficial tissue: A phantom study
title Analysis of influencing factors of shear wave elastography of the superficial tissue: A phantom study
title_full Analysis of influencing factors of shear wave elastography of the superficial tissue: A phantom study
title_fullStr Analysis of influencing factors of shear wave elastography of the superficial tissue: A phantom study
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of influencing factors of shear wave elastography of the superficial tissue: A phantom study
title_short Analysis of influencing factors of shear wave elastography of the superficial tissue: A phantom study
title_sort analysis of influencing factors of shear wave elastography of the superficial tissue: a phantom study
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9393305/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36004380
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.943844
work_keys_str_mv AT chenqiyang analysisofinfluencingfactorsofshearwaveelastographyofthesuperficialtissueaphantomstudy
AT shibaixue analysisofinfluencingfactorsofshearwaveelastographyofthesuperficialtissueaphantomstudy
AT zhengyang analysisofinfluencingfactorsofshearwaveelastographyofthesuperficialtissueaphantomstudy
AT huxiangdong analysisofinfluencingfactorsofshearwaveelastographyofthesuperficialtissueaphantomstudy