Cargando…

The discriminant validity of single-question assessments of subjective cognitive complaints in an Asian older adult population

OBJECTIVE: To compare the discriminant validity of three different single-question assessments of subjective cognitive complaints (SCC) for dementia in a community-based older adult population in Singapore. METHODS: Eligible older adults aged ≥60 were recruited into phase I for identifying those who...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pang, Ting, Zhao, Xuhao, He, Xindi, Kan, Cheuk Ni, Venketasubramanian, Narayanaswamy, Cheng, Ching-Yu, Yuan, Changzheng, Chen, Christopher, Xu, Xin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9393535/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36004002
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2022.901592
_version_ 1784771289959890944
author Pang, Ting
Zhao, Xuhao
He, Xindi
Kan, Cheuk Ni
Venketasubramanian, Narayanaswamy
Cheng, Ching-Yu
Yuan, Changzheng
Chen, Christopher
Xu, Xin
author_facet Pang, Ting
Zhao, Xuhao
He, Xindi
Kan, Cheuk Ni
Venketasubramanian, Narayanaswamy
Cheng, Ching-Yu
Yuan, Changzheng
Chen, Christopher
Xu, Xin
author_sort Pang, Ting
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare the discriminant validity of three different single-question assessments of subjective cognitive complaints (SCC) for dementia in a community-based older adult population in Singapore. METHODS: Eligible older adults aged ≥60 were recruited into phase I for identifying those who require further assessment using the Abbreviated Mental Test (AMT) and progressive forgetfulness question (PFQ). Participants who failed either tests entered phase II and were administered various single-question assessments of SCC, such as the 8th question on the patient Ascertain Dementia 8 (AD8-8(pt)), informant AD8 (AD8-8(info)), and the 10th item on the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-10), followed by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and a formal neuropsychological battery to identify the participant’s cognitive status by a research diagnosis and DSM-IV criteria. Differences in characteristics among diagnostic groups were compared. All discriminatory indices (sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values, overall accuracy) for these single-question assessments and their combinations with the MoCA were calculated and reported to confirm their discriminant validity in identifying the existence of subjective complaints and objective impairment. RESULTS: A total of 3,780 participants were assessed at phase I, of which 957 entered and completed phase II. Of whom, 911 were dementia-free and 46 had dementia. The MoCA (13/14) displayed good sensitivity (95.6%), specificity (81.5%), and overall accuracy (82.1%) for dementia detection. The GDS-10 and AD8-8(pt) showed poor discriminant validity, while the AD8-8(info) had the highest specificity (83.2%) and the greatest overall accuracy (82.5%) for dementia. Compensatory combination of the AD8-8(info) with MoCA, the sensitivity and positive predictive values were optimized (100%), while the conjunctive combination of two tools achieved excellent specificity (96.3%) and overall accuracy (94.8%) in discriminating dementia patients. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Combining a reliable single-question SCC assessment with an objective tool can efficiently discriminate dementia patients from healthy older adults in the community.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9393535
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93935352022-08-23 The discriminant validity of single-question assessments of subjective cognitive complaints in an Asian older adult population Pang, Ting Zhao, Xuhao He, Xindi Kan, Cheuk Ni Venketasubramanian, Narayanaswamy Cheng, Ching-Yu Yuan, Changzheng Chen, Christopher Xu, Xin Front Aging Neurosci Aging Neuroscience OBJECTIVE: To compare the discriminant validity of three different single-question assessments of subjective cognitive complaints (SCC) for dementia in a community-based older adult population in Singapore. METHODS: Eligible older adults aged ≥60 were recruited into phase I for identifying those who require further assessment using the Abbreviated Mental Test (AMT) and progressive forgetfulness question (PFQ). Participants who failed either tests entered phase II and were administered various single-question assessments of SCC, such as the 8th question on the patient Ascertain Dementia 8 (AD8-8(pt)), informant AD8 (AD8-8(info)), and the 10th item on the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-10), followed by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and a formal neuropsychological battery to identify the participant’s cognitive status by a research diagnosis and DSM-IV criteria. Differences in characteristics among diagnostic groups were compared. All discriminatory indices (sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values, overall accuracy) for these single-question assessments and their combinations with the MoCA were calculated and reported to confirm their discriminant validity in identifying the existence of subjective complaints and objective impairment. RESULTS: A total of 3,780 participants were assessed at phase I, of which 957 entered and completed phase II. Of whom, 911 were dementia-free and 46 had dementia. The MoCA (13/14) displayed good sensitivity (95.6%), specificity (81.5%), and overall accuracy (82.1%) for dementia detection. The GDS-10 and AD8-8(pt) showed poor discriminant validity, while the AD8-8(info) had the highest specificity (83.2%) and the greatest overall accuracy (82.5%) for dementia. Compensatory combination of the AD8-8(info) with MoCA, the sensitivity and positive predictive values were optimized (100%), while the conjunctive combination of two tools achieved excellent specificity (96.3%) and overall accuracy (94.8%) in discriminating dementia patients. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Combining a reliable single-question SCC assessment with an objective tool can efficiently discriminate dementia patients from healthy older adults in the community. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9393535/ /pubmed/36004002 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2022.901592 Text en Copyright © 2022 Pang, Zhao, He, Kan, Venketasubramanian, Cheng, Yuan, Chen and Xu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Aging Neuroscience
Pang, Ting
Zhao, Xuhao
He, Xindi
Kan, Cheuk Ni
Venketasubramanian, Narayanaswamy
Cheng, Ching-Yu
Yuan, Changzheng
Chen, Christopher
Xu, Xin
The discriminant validity of single-question assessments of subjective cognitive complaints in an Asian older adult population
title The discriminant validity of single-question assessments of subjective cognitive complaints in an Asian older adult population
title_full The discriminant validity of single-question assessments of subjective cognitive complaints in an Asian older adult population
title_fullStr The discriminant validity of single-question assessments of subjective cognitive complaints in an Asian older adult population
title_full_unstemmed The discriminant validity of single-question assessments of subjective cognitive complaints in an Asian older adult population
title_short The discriminant validity of single-question assessments of subjective cognitive complaints in an Asian older adult population
title_sort discriminant validity of single-question assessments of subjective cognitive complaints in an asian older adult population
topic Aging Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9393535/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36004002
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2022.901592
work_keys_str_mv AT pangting thediscriminantvalidityofsinglequestionassessmentsofsubjectivecognitivecomplaintsinanasianolderadultpopulation
AT zhaoxuhao thediscriminantvalidityofsinglequestionassessmentsofsubjectivecognitivecomplaintsinanasianolderadultpopulation
AT hexindi thediscriminantvalidityofsinglequestionassessmentsofsubjectivecognitivecomplaintsinanasianolderadultpopulation
AT kancheukni thediscriminantvalidityofsinglequestionassessmentsofsubjectivecognitivecomplaintsinanasianolderadultpopulation
AT venketasubramaniannarayanaswamy thediscriminantvalidityofsinglequestionassessmentsofsubjectivecognitivecomplaintsinanasianolderadultpopulation
AT chengchingyu thediscriminantvalidityofsinglequestionassessmentsofsubjectivecognitivecomplaintsinanasianolderadultpopulation
AT yuanchangzheng thediscriminantvalidityofsinglequestionassessmentsofsubjectivecognitivecomplaintsinanasianolderadultpopulation
AT chenchristopher thediscriminantvalidityofsinglequestionassessmentsofsubjectivecognitivecomplaintsinanasianolderadultpopulation
AT xuxin thediscriminantvalidityofsinglequestionassessmentsofsubjectivecognitivecomplaintsinanasianolderadultpopulation
AT pangting discriminantvalidityofsinglequestionassessmentsofsubjectivecognitivecomplaintsinanasianolderadultpopulation
AT zhaoxuhao discriminantvalidityofsinglequestionassessmentsofsubjectivecognitivecomplaintsinanasianolderadultpopulation
AT hexindi discriminantvalidityofsinglequestionassessmentsofsubjectivecognitivecomplaintsinanasianolderadultpopulation
AT kancheukni discriminantvalidityofsinglequestionassessmentsofsubjectivecognitivecomplaintsinanasianolderadultpopulation
AT venketasubramaniannarayanaswamy discriminantvalidityofsinglequestionassessmentsofsubjectivecognitivecomplaintsinanasianolderadultpopulation
AT chengchingyu discriminantvalidityofsinglequestionassessmentsofsubjectivecognitivecomplaintsinanasianolderadultpopulation
AT yuanchangzheng discriminantvalidityofsinglequestionassessmentsofsubjectivecognitivecomplaintsinanasianolderadultpopulation
AT chenchristopher discriminantvalidityofsinglequestionassessmentsofsubjectivecognitivecomplaintsinanasianolderadultpopulation
AT xuxin discriminantvalidityofsinglequestionassessmentsofsubjectivecognitivecomplaintsinanasianolderadultpopulation