Cargando…

The Clinical Complexity of Penile Cancer: Current Clinical-Epidemiological Data from the Database of the Free State of Saxony/Germany

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess penile cancer incidence, clinical characteristics, treatment options, transparency of clinical quality, and relative survival based on data from the clinical cancer registry. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A total of 898 patients with tumours of the penis were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boehm, Wolf-Diether U., Piontek, Daniela, Latarius, Stefanie, Schoffer, Olaf, Borkowetz, Angelika, Klug, Stefanie J., Wirth, Manfred P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: S. Karger AG 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9393839/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34700316
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000519210
_version_ 1784771356586409984
author Boehm, Wolf-Diether U.
Piontek, Daniela
Latarius, Stefanie
Schoffer, Olaf
Borkowetz, Angelika
Klug, Stefanie J.
Wirth, Manfred P.
author_facet Boehm, Wolf-Diether U.
Piontek, Daniela
Latarius, Stefanie
Schoffer, Olaf
Borkowetz, Angelika
Klug, Stefanie J.
Wirth, Manfred P.
author_sort Boehm, Wolf-Diether U.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess penile cancer incidence, clinical characteristics, treatment options, transparency of clinical quality, and relative survival based on data from the clinical cancer registry. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A total of 898 patients with tumours of the penis were diagnosed and analysed in the period from 2000 to 2018; they were documented in the 4 regional clinical cancer registries and summarized in the Command Office of these 4 registries. RESULTS: The standardized incidence rate increased from 0.86 in 2000 to 2.67 in 2018. Most tumours were located at the glans (42.9%) followed by the prepuce (19.5%) and corpus penis (6.9%); they were classified into pT1a/pT1b (20.0%/7.0%), pT2 (23.5%), pT3 (12.4%), and pT4 (0.8%). In only 32.0% of all documented cases, a stage-related lymphadenectomy (LND) was carried out. Negative surgical margins were found in only 70% and the Rx status in 15.1%. Primary metastasis was detected in pN1 (5.1%), pN2 (3.9%), pN3 (3.1%), and M1 status in 3.0%, respectively. The predominant therapy was surgery in 78.3%. The proportion of penile partial resections was significantly (p = 0.0045) regredient over the control period. Adjuvant chemotherapy was performed in 4.7%, adjuvant external-beam radiotherapy in 3.0%. The 5-year relative overall survival rate was 74.7% and ranged from 108.0% (stage 0) to 17.1% (stage IV). A total of 29 hospitals performed tumour operations. CONCLUSIONS: The multitude of clinical and epidemiological variables available in clinical cancer registries allows a safe assessment of tumour dynamics themselves, as well as good quality of transparency and broadly acceptable guideline adherence. Deviations from the accepted level of evidence were found in the grading definition, in the high quota of positive surgical margins, in the defensive indication position to the glans resurfacing/reconstruction and diagnostical LND. Based on these relevant findings in the database combined with the low frequency of the tumour in area/clinics/year, we recommended establishing SCCP reference clinics. This work is the first time that European standardized rate-based cancer registry data on penile cancer from Germany has been communicated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9393839
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher S. Karger AG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93938392022-09-23 The Clinical Complexity of Penile Cancer: Current Clinical-Epidemiological Data from the Database of the Free State of Saxony/Germany Boehm, Wolf-Diether U. Piontek, Daniela Latarius, Stefanie Schoffer, Olaf Borkowetz, Angelika Klug, Stefanie J. Wirth, Manfred P. Urol Int Research Article OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess penile cancer incidence, clinical characteristics, treatment options, transparency of clinical quality, and relative survival based on data from the clinical cancer registry. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A total of 898 patients with tumours of the penis were diagnosed and analysed in the period from 2000 to 2018; they were documented in the 4 regional clinical cancer registries and summarized in the Command Office of these 4 registries. RESULTS: The standardized incidence rate increased from 0.86 in 2000 to 2.67 in 2018. Most tumours were located at the glans (42.9%) followed by the prepuce (19.5%) and corpus penis (6.9%); they were classified into pT1a/pT1b (20.0%/7.0%), pT2 (23.5%), pT3 (12.4%), and pT4 (0.8%). In only 32.0% of all documented cases, a stage-related lymphadenectomy (LND) was carried out. Negative surgical margins were found in only 70% and the Rx status in 15.1%. Primary metastasis was detected in pN1 (5.1%), pN2 (3.9%), pN3 (3.1%), and M1 status in 3.0%, respectively. The predominant therapy was surgery in 78.3%. The proportion of penile partial resections was significantly (p = 0.0045) regredient over the control period. Adjuvant chemotherapy was performed in 4.7%, adjuvant external-beam radiotherapy in 3.0%. The 5-year relative overall survival rate was 74.7% and ranged from 108.0% (stage 0) to 17.1% (stage IV). A total of 29 hospitals performed tumour operations. CONCLUSIONS: The multitude of clinical and epidemiological variables available in clinical cancer registries allows a safe assessment of tumour dynamics themselves, as well as good quality of transparency and broadly acceptable guideline adherence. Deviations from the accepted level of evidence were found in the grading definition, in the high quota of positive surgical margins, in the defensive indication position to the glans resurfacing/reconstruction and diagnostical LND. Based on these relevant findings in the database combined with the low frequency of the tumour in area/clinics/year, we recommended establishing SCCP reference clinics. This work is the first time that European standardized rate-based cancer registry data on penile cancer from Germany has been communicated. S. Karger AG 2022-07 2021-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9393839/ /pubmed/34700316 http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000519210 Text en Copyright © 2021 by The Author(s) Published by S. Karger AG, Basel https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC). Usage and distribution for commercial purposes requires written permission. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
spellingShingle Research Article
Boehm, Wolf-Diether U.
Piontek, Daniela
Latarius, Stefanie
Schoffer, Olaf
Borkowetz, Angelika
Klug, Stefanie J.
Wirth, Manfred P.
The Clinical Complexity of Penile Cancer: Current Clinical-Epidemiological Data from the Database of the Free State of Saxony/Germany
title The Clinical Complexity of Penile Cancer: Current Clinical-Epidemiological Data from the Database of the Free State of Saxony/Germany
title_full The Clinical Complexity of Penile Cancer: Current Clinical-Epidemiological Data from the Database of the Free State of Saxony/Germany
title_fullStr The Clinical Complexity of Penile Cancer: Current Clinical-Epidemiological Data from the Database of the Free State of Saxony/Germany
title_full_unstemmed The Clinical Complexity of Penile Cancer: Current Clinical-Epidemiological Data from the Database of the Free State of Saxony/Germany
title_short The Clinical Complexity of Penile Cancer: Current Clinical-Epidemiological Data from the Database of the Free State of Saxony/Germany
title_sort clinical complexity of penile cancer: current clinical-epidemiological data from the database of the free state of saxony/germany
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9393839/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34700316
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000519210
work_keys_str_mv AT boehmwolfdietheru theclinicalcomplexityofpenilecancercurrentclinicalepidemiologicaldatafromthedatabaseofthefreestateofsaxonygermany
AT piontekdaniela theclinicalcomplexityofpenilecancercurrentclinicalepidemiologicaldatafromthedatabaseofthefreestateofsaxonygermany
AT latariusstefanie theclinicalcomplexityofpenilecancercurrentclinicalepidemiologicaldatafromthedatabaseofthefreestateofsaxonygermany
AT schofferolaf theclinicalcomplexityofpenilecancercurrentclinicalepidemiologicaldatafromthedatabaseofthefreestateofsaxonygermany
AT borkowetzangelika theclinicalcomplexityofpenilecancercurrentclinicalepidemiologicaldatafromthedatabaseofthefreestateofsaxonygermany
AT klugstefaniej theclinicalcomplexityofpenilecancercurrentclinicalepidemiologicaldatafromthedatabaseofthefreestateofsaxonygermany
AT wirthmanfredp theclinicalcomplexityofpenilecancercurrentclinicalepidemiologicaldatafromthedatabaseofthefreestateofsaxonygermany
AT boehmwolfdietheru clinicalcomplexityofpenilecancercurrentclinicalepidemiologicaldatafromthedatabaseofthefreestateofsaxonygermany
AT piontekdaniela clinicalcomplexityofpenilecancercurrentclinicalepidemiologicaldatafromthedatabaseofthefreestateofsaxonygermany
AT latariusstefanie clinicalcomplexityofpenilecancercurrentclinicalepidemiologicaldatafromthedatabaseofthefreestateofsaxonygermany
AT schofferolaf clinicalcomplexityofpenilecancercurrentclinicalepidemiologicaldatafromthedatabaseofthefreestateofsaxonygermany
AT borkowetzangelika clinicalcomplexityofpenilecancercurrentclinicalepidemiologicaldatafromthedatabaseofthefreestateofsaxonygermany
AT klugstefaniej clinicalcomplexityofpenilecancercurrentclinicalepidemiologicaldatafromthedatabaseofthefreestateofsaxonygermany
AT wirthmanfredp clinicalcomplexityofpenilecancercurrentclinicalepidemiologicaldatafromthedatabaseofthefreestateofsaxonygermany