Cargando…

COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among pregnant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the vaccines’ acceptance level and to find the factors influencing pregnant women’s vaccination decisions, with the goal of assisting in the development of interventions and promoting more research in t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bhattacharya, Oashe, Siddiquea, Bodrun Naher, Shetty, Aishwarya, Afroz, Afsana, Billah, Baki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9393853/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35981769
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061477
_version_ 1784771359652446208
author Bhattacharya, Oashe
Siddiquea, Bodrun Naher
Shetty, Aishwarya
Afroz, Afsana
Billah, Baki
author_facet Bhattacharya, Oashe
Siddiquea, Bodrun Naher
Shetty, Aishwarya
Afroz, Afsana
Billah, Baki
author_sort Bhattacharya, Oashe
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the vaccines’ acceptance level and to find the factors influencing pregnant women’s vaccination decisions, with the goal of assisting in the development of interventions and promoting more research in this area. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and PubMed. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies providing any kind of quantitative assessment of overall COVID-19 vaccination acceptance among pregnant women in any country or region across the globe. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: The pooled prevalence of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among pregnant women was calculated using the random-effects model. Subgroup (sensitivity) analysis was performed to determine the overall COVID-19 vaccine acceptance level to understand the sources of substantial heterogeneity. RESULTS: Out of the 375 studies identified, 17 studies from four continents assessing 25 147 participants (pregnant women) were included in this study. Among the participants, only 49% (95% CI 42% to 56%, p<0.001) had COVID-19 vaccine acceptance. High-income countries (47%; 95% CI 38% to 55%, p<0.001), participants with fewer than 12 years of education (38%; 95% CI 19% to 58%, p<0.001) and multiparous women (48%; 95% CI 31% to 66%, p<0.001) had lower COVID-19 vaccine acceptance. Overall heterogeneity was high (I(2) ≥98%), and publication bias was present (p<0.001). A very weak positive correlation between COVID-19 knowledge and COVID-19 vaccine acceptance was observed (r=0.164; 95% CI −0.946 to 0.972; p=0.8359). CONCLUSION: Overall, COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among pregnant women was low across the studies and considerably low among some specific subgroups of participants. These research findings have implications for the development of effective interventions that could increase the COVID-19 vaccine acceptance level among pregnant women to attain herd immunity. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021277754.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9393853
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93938532022-08-22 COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among pregnant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis Bhattacharya, Oashe Siddiquea, Bodrun Naher Shetty, Aishwarya Afroz, Afsana Billah, Baki BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the vaccines’ acceptance level and to find the factors influencing pregnant women’s vaccination decisions, with the goal of assisting in the development of interventions and promoting more research in this area. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and PubMed. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies providing any kind of quantitative assessment of overall COVID-19 vaccination acceptance among pregnant women in any country or region across the globe. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: The pooled prevalence of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among pregnant women was calculated using the random-effects model. Subgroup (sensitivity) analysis was performed to determine the overall COVID-19 vaccine acceptance level to understand the sources of substantial heterogeneity. RESULTS: Out of the 375 studies identified, 17 studies from four continents assessing 25 147 participants (pregnant women) were included in this study. Among the participants, only 49% (95% CI 42% to 56%, p<0.001) had COVID-19 vaccine acceptance. High-income countries (47%; 95% CI 38% to 55%, p<0.001), participants with fewer than 12 years of education (38%; 95% CI 19% to 58%, p<0.001) and multiparous women (48%; 95% CI 31% to 66%, p<0.001) had lower COVID-19 vaccine acceptance. Overall heterogeneity was high (I(2) ≥98%), and publication bias was present (p<0.001). A very weak positive correlation between COVID-19 knowledge and COVID-19 vaccine acceptance was observed (r=0.164; 95% CI −0.946 to 0.972; p=0.8359). CONCLUSION: Overall, COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among pregnant women was low across the studies and considerably low among some specific subgroups of participants. These research findings have implications for the development of effective interventions that could increase the COVID-19 vaccine acceptance level among pregnant women to attain herd immunity. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021277754. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9393853/ /pubmed/35981769 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061477 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Public Health
Bhattacharya, Oashe
Siddiquea, Bodrun Naher
Shetty, Aishwarya
Afroz, Afsana
Billah, Baki
COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among pregnant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among pregnant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among pregnant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among pregnant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among pregnant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among pregnant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort covid-19 vaccine hesitancy among pregnant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9393853/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35981769
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061477
work_keys_str_mv AT bhattacharyaoashe covid19vaccinehesitancyamongpregnantwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT siddiqueabodrunnaher covid19vaccinehesitancyamongpregnantwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shettyaishwarya covid19vaccinehesitancyamongpregnantwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT afrozafsana covid19vaccinehesitancyamongpregnantwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT billahbaki covid19vaccinehesitancyamongpregnantwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis