Cargando…
A Review of Strategies to Improve Biomechanical Fixation in the Cervical Spine
STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. OBJECTIVES: Review the surgical techniques and construct options aimed at improving the biomechanical strength of cervical constructs. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9393983/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35020520 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21925682211063855 |
_version_ | 1784771387869626368 |
---|---|
author | Oitment, Colby Thornley, Patrick Koziarz, Frank Jentzsch, Thorsten Bhanot, Kunal |
author_facet | Oitment, Colby Thornley, Patrick Koziarz, Frank Jentzsch, Thorsten Bhanot, Kunal |
author_sort | Oitment, Colby |
collection | PubMed |
description | STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. OBJECTIVES: Review the surgical techniques and construct options aimed at improving the biomechanical strength of cervical constructs. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A search of the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was performed to identify all studies examining biomechanical strategies utilized in the osteoporotic cervical spine. Screening was performed in duplicate for all stages of the review process. RESULTS: An initial search returned 3887 articles. After deletion of duplications and review of abstracts and full text, 39 articles met inclusion criteria. Overall, the surgical techniques reviewed aimed at obtaining rigid fixation in the setting of poor bone quality, or dispersing the forces at the bone-implant interface. We identified 6 key techniques to improve biomechanical fixation. These include bicortical fixation, appropriate screw selection (size and trajectory), PMMA augmentation, load sharing techniques, consideration of ancillary fixation around the occipitocervical junction, and supplementing the construct with post-operative collar or halo. CONCLUSION: The summation of the literature highlights a framework of modalities available to surgeons to improve biomechanical fixation in the cervical spine. While these may improve construct strength in the setting of osteoporosis, there is a paucity of evidence available to make recommendations in this patient population. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9393983 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93939832022-08-23 A Review of Strategies to Improve Biomechanical Fixation in the Cervical Spine Oitment, Colby Thornley, Patrick Koziarz, Frank Jentzsch, Thorsten Bhanot, Kunal Global Spine J Review Articles STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. OBJECTIVES: Review the surgical techniques and construct options aimed at improving the biomechanical strength of cervical constructs. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A search of the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was performed to identify all studies examining biomechanical strategies utilized in the osteoporotic cervical spine. Screening was performed in duplicate for all stages of the review process. RESULTS: An initial search returned 3887 articles. After deletion of duplications and review of abstracts and full text, 39 articles met inclusion criteria. Overall, the surgical techniques reviewed aimed at obtaining rigid fixation in the setting of poor bone quality, or dispersing the forces at the bone-implant interface. We identified 6 key techniques to improve biomechanical fixation. These include bicortical fixation, appropriate screw selection (size and trajectory), PMMA augmentation, load sharing techniques, consideration of ancillary fixation around the occipitocervical junction, and supplementing the construct with post-operative collar or halo. CONCLUSION: The summation of the literature highlights a framework of modalities available to surgeons to improve biomechanical fixation in the cervical spine. While these may improve construct strength in the setting of osteoporosis, there is a paucity of evidence available to make recommendations in this patient population. SAGE Publications 2022-01-12 2022-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9393983/ /pubmed/35020520 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21925682211063855 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Review Articles Oitment, Colby Thornley, Patrick Koziarz, Frank Jentzsch, Thorsten Bhanot, Kunal A Review of Strategies to Improve Biomechanical Fixation in the Cervical Spine |
title | A Review of Strategies to Improve Biomechanical Fixation in the Cervical Spine |
title_full | A Review of Strategies to Improve Biomechanical Fixation in the Cervical Spine |
title_fullStr | A Review of Strategies to Improve Biomechanical Fixation in the Cervical Spine |
title_full_unstemmed | A Review of Strategies to Improve Biomechanical Fixation in the Cervical Spine |
title_short | A Review of Strategies to Improve Biomechanical Fixation in the Cervical Spine |
title_sort | review of strategies to improve biomechanical fixation in the cervical spine |
topic | Review Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9393983/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35020520 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21925682211063855 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oitmentcolby areviewofstrategiestoimprovebiomechanicalfixationinthecervicalspine AT thornleypatrick areviewofstrategiestoimprovebiomechanicalfixationinthecervicalspine AT koziarzfrank areviewofstrategiestoimprovebiomechanicalfixationinthecervicalspine AT jentzschthorsten areviewofstrategiestoimprovebiomechanicalfixationinthecervicalspine AT bhanotkunal areviewofstrategiestoimprovebiomechanicalfixationinthecervicalspine AT oitmentcolby reviewofstrategiestoimprovebiomechanicalfixationinthecervicalspine AT thornleypatrick reviewofstrategiestoimprovebiomechanicalfixationinthecervicalspine AT koziarzfrank reviewofstrategiestoimprovebiomechanicalfixationinthecervicalspine AT jentzschthorsten reviewofstrategiestoimprovebiomechanicalfixationinthecervicalspine AT bhanotkunal reviewofstrategiestoimprovebiomechanicalfixationinthecervicalspine |