Cargando…

A Review of Strategies to Improve Biomechanical Fixation in the Cervical Spine

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. OBJECTIVES: Review the surgical techniques and construct options aimed at improving the biomechanical strength of cervical constructs. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oitment, Colby, Thornley, Patrick, Koziarz, Frank, Jentzsch, Thorsten, Bhanot, Kunal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9393983/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35020520
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21925682211063855
_version_ 1784771387869626368
author Oitment, Colby
Thornley, Patrick
Koziarz, Frank
Jentzsch, Thorsten
Bhanot, Kunal
author_facet Oitment, Colby
Thornley, Patrick
Koziarz, Frank
Jentzsch, Thorsten
Bhanot, Kunal
author_sort Oitment, Colby
collection PubMed
description STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. OBJECTIVES: Review the surgical techniques and construct options aimed at improving the biomechanical strength of cervical constructs. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A search of the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was performed to identify all studies examining biomechanical strategies utilized in the osteoporotic cervical spine. Screening was performed in duplicate for all stages of the review process. RESULTS: An initial search returned 3887 articles. After deletion of duplications and review of abstracts and full text, 39 articles met inclusion criteria. Overall, the surgical techniques reviewed aimed at obtaining rigid fixation in the setting of poor bone quality, or dispersing the forces at the bone-implant interface. We identified 6 key techniques to improve biomechanical fixation. These include bicortical fixation, appropriate screw selection (size and trajectory), PMMA augmentation, load sharing techniques, consideration of ancillary fixation around the occipitocervical junction, and supplementing the construct with post-operative collar or halo. CONCLUSION: The summation of the literature highlights a framework of modalities available to surgeons to improve biomechanical fixation in the cervical spine. While these may improve construct strength in the setting of osteoporosis, there is a paucity of evidence available to make recommendations in this patient population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9393983
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93939832022-08-23 A Review of Strategies to Improve Biomechanical Fixation in the Cervical Spine Oitment, Colby Thornley, Patrick Koziarz, Frank Jentzsch, Thorsten Bhanot, Kunal Global Spine J Review Articles STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. OBJECTIVES: Review the surgical techniques and construct options aimed at improving the biomechanical strength of cervical constructs. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A search of the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was performed to identify all studies examining biomechanical strategies utilized in the osteoporotic cervical spine. Screening was performed in duplicate for all stages of the review process. RESULTS: An initial search returned 3887 articles. After deletion of duplications and review of abstracts and full text, 39 articles met inclusion criteria. Overall, the surgical techniques reviewed aimed at obtaining rigid fixation in the setting of poor bone quality, or dispersing the forces at the bone-implant interface. We identified 6 key techniques to improve biomechanical fixation. These include bicortical fixation, appropriate screw selection (size and trajectory), PMMA augmentation, load sharing techniques, consideration of ancillary fixation around the occipitocervical junction, and supplementing the construct with post-operative collar or halo. CONCLUSION: The summation of the literature highlights a framework of modalities available to surgeons to improve biomechanical fixation in the cervical spine. While these may improve construct strength in the setting of osteoporosis, there is a paucity of evidence available to make recommendations in this patient population. SAGE Publications 2022-01-12 2022-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9393983/ /pubmed/35020520 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21925682211063855 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Review Articles
Oitment, Colby
Thornley, Patrick
Koziarz, Frank
Jentzsch, Thorsten
Bhanot, Kunal
A Review of Strategies to Improve Biomechanical Fixation in the Cervical Spine
title A Review of Strategies to Improve Biomechanical Fixation in the Cervical Spine
title_full A Review of Strategies to Improve Biomechanical Fixation in the Cervical Spine
title_fullStr A Review of Strategies to Improve Biomechanical Fixation in the Cervical Spine
title_full_unstemmed A Review of Strategies to Improve Biomechanical Fixation in the Cervical Spine
title_short A Review of Strategies to Improve Biomechanical Fixation in the Cervical Spine
title_sort review of strategies to improve biomechanical fixation in the cervical spine
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9393983/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35020520
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21925682211063855
work_keys_str_mv AT oitmentcolby areviewofstrategiestoimprovebiomechanicalfixationinthecervicalspine
AT thornleypatrick areviewofstrategiestoimprovebiomechanicalfixationinthecervicalspine
AT koziarzfrank areviewofstrategiestoimprovebiomechanicalfixationinthecervicalspine
AT jentzschthorsten areviewofstrategiestoimprovebiomechanicalfixationinthecervicalspine
AT bhanotkunal areviewofstrategiestoimprovebiomechanicalfixationinthecervicalspine
AT oitmentcolby reviewofstrategiestoimprovebiomechanicalfixationinthecervicalspine
AT thornleypatrick reviewofstrategiestoimprovebiomechanicalfixationinthecervicalspine
AT koziarzfrank reviewofstrategiestoimprovebiomechanicalfixationinthecervicalspine
AT jentzschthorsten reviewofstrategiestoimprovebiomechanicalfixationinthecervicalspine
AT bhanotkunal reviewofstrategiestoimprovebiomechanicalfixationinthecervicalspine