Cargando…
Fixed-Effect vs Random-Effects Models for Meta-Analysis: 3 Points to Consider
| Autores principales: | , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
| Lenguaje: | English |
| Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9393987/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35723546 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21925682221110527 |
| _version_ | 1784771388846899200 |
|---|---|
| author | Dettori, Joseph R. Norvell, Daniel C. Chapman, Jens R. |
| author_facet | Dettori, Joseph R. Norvell, Daniel C. Chapman, Jens R. |
| author_sort | Dettori, Joseph R. |
| collection | PubMed |
| description | |
| format | Online Article Text |
| id | pubmed-9393987 |
| institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2022 |
| publisher | SAGE Publications |
| record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
| spelling | pubmed-93939872022-08-23 Fixed-Effect vs Random-Effects Models for Meta-Analysis: 3 Points to Consider Dettori, Joseph R. Norvell, Daniel C. Chapman, Jens R. Global Spine J EBSJ - Science in Spine SAGE Publications 2022-06-20 2022-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9393987/ /pubmed/35723546 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21925682221110527 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
| spellingShingle | EBSJ - Science in Spine Dettori, Joseph R. Norvell, Daniel C. Chapman, Jens R. Fixed-Effect vs Random-Effects Models for Meta-Analysis: 3 Points to Consider |
| title | Fixed-Effect vs Random-Effects Models for Meta-Analysis: 3 Points to Consider |
| title_full | Fixed-Effect vs Random-Effects Models for Meta-Analysis: 3 Points to Consider |
| title_fullStr | Fixed-Effect vs Random-Effects Models for Meta-Analysis: 3 Points to Consider |
| title_full_unstemmed | Fixed-Effect vs Random-Effects Models for Meta-Analysis: 3 Points to Consider |
| title_short | Fixed-Effect vs Random-Effects Models for Meta-Analysis: 3 Points to Consider |
| title_sort | fixed-effect vs random-effects models for meta-analysis: 3 points to consider |
| topic | EBSJ - Science in Spine |
| url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9393987/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35723546 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21925682221110527 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT dettorijosephr fixedeffectvsrandomeffectsmodelsformetaanalysis3pointstoconsider AT norvelldanielc fixedeffectvsrandomeffectsmodelsformetaanalysis3pointstoconsider AT chapmanjensr fixedeffectvsrandomeffectsmodelsformetaanalysis3pointstoconsider |