Cargando…

Artificial Learning and Machine Learning Applications in Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES: This current systematic review sought to identify and evaluate all current research-based spine surgery applications of AI/ML in optimizing preoperative patient selection, as well as predicting and managing postoperative outcomes and complications. METHODS: A comprehensive search of publ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lopez, Cesar D., Boddapati, Venkat, Lombardi, Joseph M., Lee, Nathan J., Mathew, Justin, Danford, Nicholas C., Iyer, Rajiv R., Dyrszka, Marc D., Sardar, Zeeshan M., Lenke, Lawrence G., Lehman, Ronald A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9393994/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35227128
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21925682211049164
_version_ 1784771390521475072
author Lopez, Cesar D.
Boddapati, Venkat
Lombardi, Joseph M.
Lee, Nathan J.
Mathew, Justin
Danford, Nicholas C.
Iyer, Rajiv R.
Dyrszka, Marc D.
Sardar, Zeeshan M.
Lenke, Lawrence G.
Lehman, Ronald A.
author_facet Lopez, Cesar D.
Boddapati, Venkat
Lombardi, Joseph M.
Lee, Nathan J.
Mathew, Justin
Danford, Nicholas C.
Iyer, Rajiv R.
Dyrszka, Marc D.
Sardar, Zeeshan M.
Lenke, Lawrence G.
Lehman, Ronald A.
author_sort Lopez, Cesar D.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This current systematic review sought to identify and evaluate all current research-based spine surgery applications of AI/ML in optimizing preoperative patient selection, as well as predicting and managing postoperative outcomes and complications. METHODS: A comprehensive search of publications was conducted through the EMBASE, Medline, and PubMed databases using relevant keywords to maximize the sensitivity of the search. No limits were placed on level of evidence or timing of the study. Findings were reported according to the PRISMA guidelines RESULTS: After application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 41 studies were included in this review. Bayesian networks had the highest average AUC (.80), and neural networks had the best accuracy (83.0%), sensitivity (81.5%), and specificity (71.8%). Preoperative planning/cost prediction models (.89,82.2%) and discharge/length of stay models (.80,78.0%) each reported significantly higher average AUC and accuracy compared to readmissions/reoperation prediction models (.67,70.2%) (P < .001, P = .005, respectively). Model performance also significantly varied across postoperative management applications for average AUC and accuracy values (P < .001, P < .027, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Generally, authors of the reviewed studies concluded that AI/ML offers a potentially beneficial tool for providers to optimize patient care and improve cost-efficiency. More specifically, AI/ML models performed best, on average, when optimizing preoperative patient selection and planning and predicting costs, hospital discharge, and length of stay. However, models were not as accurate in predicting postoperative complications, adverse events, and readmissions and reoperations. An understanding of AI/ML-based applications is becoming increasingly important, particularly in spine surgery, as the volume of reported literature, technology accessibility, and clinical applications continue to rapidly expand.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9393994
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93939942022-08-23 Artificial Learning and Machine Learning Applications in Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review Lopez, Cesar D. Boddapati, Venkat Lombardi, Joseph M. Lee, Nathan J. Mathew, Justin Danford, Nicholas C. Iyer, Rajiv R. Dyrszka, Marc D. Sardar, Zeeshan M. Lenke, Lawrence G. Lehman, Ronald A. Global Spine J Review Articles OBJECTIVES: This current systematic review sought to identify and evaluate all current research-based spine surgery applications of AI/ML in optimizing preoperative patient selection, as well as predicting and managing postoperative outcomes and complications. METHODS: A comprehensive search of publications was conducted through the EMBASE, Medline, and PubMed databases using relevant keywords to maximize the sensitivity of the search. No limits were placed on level of evidence or timing of the study. Findings were reported according to the PRISMA guidelines RESULTS: After application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 41 studies were included in this review. Bayesian networks had the highest average AUC (.80), and neural networks had the best accuracy (83.0%), sensitivity (81.5%), and specificity (71.8%). Preoperative planning/cost prediction models (.89,82.2%) and discharge/length of stay models (.80,78.0%) each reported significantly higher average AUC and accuracy compared to readmissions/reoperation prediction models (.67,70.2%) (P < .001, P = .005, respectively). Model performance also significantly varied across postoperative management applications for average AUC and accuracy values (P < .001, P < .027, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Generally, authors of the reviewed studies concluded that AI/ML offers a potentially beneficial tool for providers to optimize patient care and improve cost-efficiency. More specifically, AI/ML models performed best, on average, when optimizing preoperative patient selection and planning and predicting costs, hospital discharge, and length of stay. However, models were not as accurate in predicting postoperative complications, adverse events, and readmissions and reoperations. An understanding of AI/ML-based applications is becoming increasingly important, particularly in spine surgery, as the volume of reported literature, technology accessibility, and clinical applications continue to rapidly expand. SAGE Publications 2022-02-28 2022-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9393994/ /pubmed/35227128 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21925682211049164 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Review Articles
Lopez, Cesar D.
Boddapati, Venkat
Lombardi, Joseph M.
Lee, Nathan J.
Mathew, Justin
Danford, Nicholas C.
Iyer, Rajiv R.
Dyrszka, Marc D.
Sardar, Zeeshan M.
Lenke, Lawrence G.
Lehman, Ronald A.
Artificial Learning and Machine Learning Applications in Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review
title Artificial Learning and Machine Learning Applications in Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review
title_full Artificial Learning and Machine Learning Applications in Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Artificial Learning and Machine Learning Applications in Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Artificial Learning and Machine Learning Applications in Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review
title_short Artificial Learning and Machine Learning Applications in Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review
title_sort artificial learning and machine learning applications in spine surgery: a systematic review
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9393994/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35227128
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21925682211049164
work_keys_str_mv AT lopezcesard artificiallearningandmachinelearningapplicationsinspinesurgeryasystematicreview
AT boddapativenkat artificiallearningandmachinelearningapplicationsinspinesurgeryasystematicreview
AT lombardijosephm artificiallearningandmachinelearningapplicationsinspinesurgeryasystematicreview
AT leenathanj artificiallearningandmachinelearningapplicationsinspinesurgeryasystematicreview
AT mathewjustin artificiallearningandmachinelearningapplicationsinspinesurgeryasystematicreview
AT danfordnicholasc artificiallearningandmachinelearningapplicationsinspinesurgeryasystematicreview
AT iyerrajivr artificiallearningandmachinelearningapplicationsinspinesurgeryasystematicreview
AT dyrszkamarcd artificiallearningandmachinelearningapplicationsinspinesurgeryasystematicreview
AT sardarzeeshanm artificiallearningandmachinelearningapplicationsinspinesurgeryasystematicreview
AT lenkelawrenceg artificiallearningandmachinelearningapplicationsinspinesurgeryasystematicreview
AT lehmanronalda artificiallearningandmachinelearningapplicationsinspinesurgeryasystematicreview