Cargando…

Substandard and falsified antibiotics: neglected drivers of antimicrobial resistance?

OBJECTIVES: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a significant global health threat with substandard and falsified (SF) antibiotics being neglected contributing factors. With their relationships poorly understood, more research is needed in order to determine how interventions to reduce SF antibiotics...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zabala, Guillermo A, Bellingham, Khonsavath, Vidhamaly, Vayouly, Boupha, Phonepasith, Boutsamay, Kem, Newton, Paul N, Caillet, Céline
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9394205/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35981806
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-008587
_version_ 1784771436644139008
author Zabala, Guillermo A
Bellingham, Khonsavath
Vidhamaly, Vayouly
Boupha, Phonepasith
Boutsamay, Kem
Newton, Paul N
Caillet, Céline
author_facet Zabala, Guillermo A
Bellingham, Khonsavath
Vidhamaly, Vayouly
Boupha, Phonepasith
Boutsamay, Kem
Newton, Paul N
Caillet, Céline
author_sort Zabala, Guillermo A
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a significant global health threat with substandard and falsified (SF) antibiotics being neglected contributing factors. With their relationships poorly understood, more research is needed in order to determine how interventions to reduce SF antibiotics should be ranked as priorities in national AMR action plans. We assessed the evidence available on the global prevalence of SF antibiotics, examined the quality of the evidence and discussed public health impact. MATERIALS/METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Google and Google Scholar for publications on antibiotic quality up to 31 December 2020. Publications reporting on the prevalence of SF antibiotics were evaluated for quantitative analysis and assessed using the Medicines Quality Assessment Reporting Guidelines. RESULTS: Of the 10 137 screened publications, 648 were relevant to antibiotic quality. One hundred and six (16.4%) surveys, published between 1992 and 2020 and conducted mainly in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) (89.9% (480/534) of the data points), qualified for quantitative analysis. The total number of samples tested for quality in prevalence surveys was 13 555, with a median (Q1–Q3) number of samples per survey of 47 (21–135). Of the 13 555 samples, 2357 (17.4%) failed at least one quality test and the median failure frequency (FF) per survey was 19.6% (7.6%–35.0%). Amoxicillin, sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim and ciprofloxacin were the most surveyed antibiotics, with FF of 16.1% (355/2208), 26.2% (329/1255) and 10.4% (366/3511), respectively. We identified no SF survey data for antibiotics in the WHO ‘Reserve’ group. The mean Medicine Quality Assessment Reporting Guidelines score was 11 (95% CI 10.1 to 12.2) out of 26. CONCLUSIONS: SF antibiotics are widely spread with higher prevalence in LMICs. The quality of the evidence is poor, and these data are not generalisable that 17.4% of global antibiotic supply is SF. However, the evidence we have suggests that interventions to enhance regulatory, purchasing and financial mechanisms to improve the global antibiotic supply are needed. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019124988.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9394205
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93942052022-09-06 Substandard and falsified antibiotics: neglected drivers of antimicrobial resistance? Zabala, Guillermo A Bellingham, Khonsavath Vidhamaly, Vayouly Boupha, Phonepasith Boutsamay, Kem Newton, Paul N Caillet, Céline BMJ Glob Health Original Research OBJECTIVES: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a significant global health threat with substandard and falsified (SF) antibiotics being neglected contributing factors. With their relationships poorly understood, more research is needed in order to determine how interventions to reduce SF antibiotics should be ranked as priorities in national AMR action plans. We assessed the evidence available on the global prevalence of SF antibiotics, examined the quality of the evidence and discussed public health impact. MATERIALS/METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Google and Google Scholar for publications on antibiotic quality up to 31 December 2020. Publications reporting on the prevalence of SF antibiotics were evaluated for quantitative analysis and assessed using the Medicines Quality Assessment Reporting Guidelines. RESULTS: Of the 10 137 screened publications, 648 were relevant to antibiotic quality. One hundred and six (16.4%) surveys, published between 1992 and 2020 and conducted mainly in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) (89.9% (480/534) of the data points), qualified for quantitative analysis. The total number of samples tested for quality in prevalence surveys was 13 555, with a median (Q1–Q3) number of samples per survey of 47 (21–135). Of the 13 555 samples, 2357 (17.4%) failed at least one quality test and the median failure frequency (FF) per survey was 19.6% (7.6%–35.0%). Amoxicillin, sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim and ciprofloxacin were the most surveyed antibiotics, with FF of 16.1% (355/2208), 26.2% (329/1255) and 10.4% (366/3511), respectively. We identified no SF survey data for antibiotics in the WHO ‘Reserve’ group. The mean Medicine Quality Assessment Reporting Guidelines score was 11 (95% CI 10.1 to 12.2) out of 26. CONCLUSIONS: SF antibiotics are widely spread with higher prevalence in LMICs. The quality of the evidence is poor, and these data are not generalisable that 17.4% of global antibiotic supply is SF. However, the evidence we have suggests that interventions to enhance regulatory, purchasing and financial mechanisms to improve the global antibiotic supply are needed. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019124988. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9394205/ /pubmed/35981806 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-008587 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Zabala, Guillermo A
Bellingham, Khonsavath
Vidhamaly, Vayouly
Boupha, Phonepasith
Boutsamay, Kem
Newton, Paul N
Caillet, Céline
Substandard and falsified antibiotics: neglected drivers of antimicrobial resistance?
title Substandard and falsified antibiotics: neglected drivers of antimicrobial resistance?
title_full Substandard and falsified antibiotics: neglected drivers of antimicrobial resistance?
title_fullStr Substandard and falsified antibiotics: neglected drivers of antimicrobial resistance?
title_full_unstemmed Substandard and falsified antibiotics: neglected drivers of antimicrobial resistance?
title_short Substandard and falsified antibiotics: neglected drivers of antimicrobial resistance?
title_sort substandard and falsified antibiotics: neglected drivers of antimicrobial resistance?
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9394205/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35981806
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-008587
work_keys_str_mv AT zabalaguillermoa substandardandfalsifiedantibioticsneglecteddriversofantimicrobialresistance
AT bellinghamkhonsavath substandardandfalsifiedantibioticsneglecteddriversofantimicrobialresistance
AT vidhamalyvayouly substandardandfalsifiedantibioticsneglecteddriversofantimicrobialresistance
AT bouphaphonepasith substandardandfalsifiedantibioticsneglecteddriversofantimicrobialresistance
AT boutsamaykem substandardandfalsifiedantibioticsneglecteddriversofantimicrobialresistance
AT newtonpauln substandardandfalsifiedantibioticsneglecteddriversofantimicrobialresistance
AT cailletceline substandardandfalsifiedantibioticsneglecteddriversofantimicrobialresistance