Cargando…

Quantification of Liver Fat Content with the iATT Algorithm: Correlation with Controlled Attenuation Parameter

Background: The primary aim of our study was to assess the correlation between an improved version of the attenuation coefficient available on the Arietta 850 ultrasound system (iATT, Fujifilm Healthcare, Tokyo, Japan) and controlled attenuation parameter (CAP). The secondary aim was to assess wheth...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ferraioli, Giovanna, Raimondi, Ambra, Maiocchi, Laura, De Silvestri, Annalisa, Filice, Carlo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9394249/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35892497
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12081787
_version_ 1784771446352904192
author Ferraioli, Giovanna
Raimondi, Ambra
Maiocchi, Laura
De Silvestri, Annalisa
Filice, Carlo
author_facet Ferraioli, Giovanna
Raimondi, Ambra
Maiocchi, Laura
De Silvestri, Annalisa
Filice, Carlo
author_sort Ferraioli, Giovanna
collection PubMed
description Background: The primary aim of our study was to assess the correlation between an improved version of the attenuation coefficient available on the Arietta 850 ultrasound system (iATT, Fujifilm Healthcare, Tokyo, Japan) and controlled attenuation parameter (CAP). The secondary aim was to assess whether focusing only on iATT acquisition without following the strict protocol for liver stiffness measurements would affect iATT measurement. Methods: Consecutive individuals were enrolled. Pearson’s r was used to test the correlation between ATT and CAP values. The concordance between iATT and CAP was tested using Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). Results: 354 individuals (203 males, 151 females) were studied. The overall Pearson correlation between CAP and iATT values obtained following or not following the liver stiffness measurement protocol, respectively, were r = 0.73 and r = 0.71. The correlation was affected by the interquartile range/median (IQR/M) of the 10 measurements: it was r = 0.75 for IQR/M ≤ 15% and r = 0.60 for IQR/M > 15%. CCC showed that there was a moderate to good concordance between iATT and CAP values. Conclusion: iATT shows a strong correlation with CAP that does not decrease when the protocol for liver stiffness acquisition is not followed. The correlation between iATT and CAP values is higher when the IQR/M ≤ 15%.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9394249
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93942492022-08-23 Quantification of Liver Fat Content with the iATT Algorithm: Correlation with Controlled Attenuation Parameter Ferraioli, Giovanna Raimondi, Ambra Maiocchi, Laura De Silvestri, Annalisa Filice, Carlo Diagnostics (Basel) Article Background: The primary aim of our study was to assess the correlation between an improved version of the attenuation coefficient available on the Arietta 850 ultrasound system (iATT, Fujifilm Healthcare, Tokyo, Japan) and controlled attenuation parameter (CAP). The secondary aim was to assess whether focusing only on iATT acquisition without following the strict protocol for liver stiffness measurements would affect iATT measurement. Methods: Consecutive individuals were enrolled. Pearson’s r was used to test the correlation between ATT and CAP values. The concordance between iATT and CAP was tested using Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). Results: 354 individuals (203 males, 151 females) were studied. The overall Pearson correlation between CAP and iATT values obtained following or not following the liver stiffness measurement protocol, respectively, were r = 0.73 and r = 0.71. The correlation was affected by the interquartile range/median (IQR/M) of the 10 measurements: it was r = 0.75 for IQR/M ≤ 15% and r = 0.60 for IQR/M > 15%. CCC showed that there was a moderate to good concordance between iATT and CAP values. Conclusion: iATT shows a strong correlation with CAP that does not decrease when the protocol for liver stiffness acquisition is not followed. The correlation between iATT and CAP values is higher when the IQR/M ≤ 15%. MDPI 2022-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9394249/ /pubmed/35892497 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12081787 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ferraioli, Giovanna
Raimondi, Ambra
Maiocchi, Laura
De Silvestri, Annalisa
Filice, Carlo
Quantification of Liver Fat Content with the iATT Algorithm: Correlation with Controlled Attenuation Parameter
title Quantification of Liver Fat Content with the iATT Algorithm: Correlation with Controlled Attenuation Parameter
title_full Quantification of Liver Fat Content with the iATT Algorithm: Correlation with Controlled Attenuation Parameter
title_fullStr Quantification of Liver Fat Content with the iATT Algorithm: Correlation with Controlled Attenuation Parameter
title_full_unstemmed Quantification of Liver Fat Content with the iATT Algorithm: Correlation with Controlled Attenuation Parameter
title_short Quantification of Liver Fat Content with the iATT Algorithm: Correlation with Controlled Attenuation Parameter
title_sort quantification of liver fat content with the iatt algorithm: correlation with controlled attenuation parameter
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9394249/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35892497
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12081787
work_keys_str_mv AT ferraioligiovanna quantificationofliverfatcontentwiththeiattalgorithmcorrelationwithcontrolledattenuationparameter
AT raimondiambra quantificationofliverfatcontentwiththeiattalgorithmcorrelationwithcontrolledattenuationparameter
AT maiocchilaura quantificationofliverfatcontentwiththeiattalgorithmcorrelationwithcontrolledattenuationparameter
AT desilvestriannalisa quantificationofliverfatcontentwiththeiattalgorithmcorrelationwithcontrolledattenuationparameter
AT filicecarlo quantificationofliverfatcontentwiththeiattalgorithmcorrelationwithcontrolledattenuationparameter