Cargando…

Validation of the RunScribe inertial measurement unit for walking gait measurement

INTRODUCTION: The use of portable gait measurement systems in research is appealing to collect real-world data at low-cost, low participant burden, and without requirement for dedicated lab space. Most commercially available inertial measurement units (IMU’s) designed for running only capture tempor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lewin, Max, Price, Carina, Nester, Christopher
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9394823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35994458
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273308
_version_ 1784771559950385152
author Lewin, Max
Price, Carina
Nester, Christopher
author_facet Lewin, Max
Price, Carina
Nester, Christopher
author_sort Lewin, Max
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The use of portable gait measurement systems in research is appealing to collect real-world data at low-cost, low participant burden, and without requirement for dedicated lab space. Most commercially available inertial measurement units (IMU’s) designed for running only capture temporospatial data, the ability to capture biomechanics data such as shock and motion metrics with the RunScribe IMU makes it the closest to a lab alternative. The RunScribe system has been validated in running, however, is yet to be validated for walking. METHOD: Qualisys motion capture, AMTI force plates, and Delsys Trigno accelerometers were used as gold standard lab measures for comparison against the RunScribe IMU. Twenty participants completed 10 footsteps per foot (20 total) measured by both systems simultaneously. Variables for validation included: Vertical Ground reaction force (GRF), instantaneous GRF rate, pronation excursion, pronation velocity, total shock, impact force, braking force. Interclass correlation (ICC) was used to determine agreement between the measurement systems, mean differences were used to evaluate group level accuracy. RESULTS: ICC results showed moderate agreement between measurement systems when both limbs were averaged. The greatest agreement was seen for GRF rate, pronation excursion, and pronation velocity (ICC = 0.627, 0.616, 0.539), low agreement was seen for GRF, total shock, impact shock, braking shock (ICC = 0.269, 0.351, 0.244, 0.180). However mean differences show the greatest level of accuracy for GRF, GRF rate, and impact shock. DISCUSSION: Results show mixed agreement between the RunScribe and gold standard lab measures, and varied agreement across left and right limbs. Kinematic variables showed the greatest agreement, however GRF had the lowest relative mean difference for group results. The results show acceptable levels of agreement for most variables, however further work must be done to assess the repeatability and sensitivity of the RunScribe to be applied within areas such as footwear testing and gait retraining protocols.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9394823
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93948232022-08-23 Validation of the RunScribe inertial measurement unit for walking gait measurement Lewin, Max Price, Carina Nester, Christopher PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: The use of portable gait measurement systems in research is appealing to collect real-world data at low-cost, low participant burden, and without requirement for dedicated lab space. Most commercially available inertial measurement units (IMU’s) designed for running only capture temporospatial data, the ability to capture biomechanics data such as shock and motion metrics with the RunScribe IMU makes it the closest to a lab alternative. The RunScribe system has been validated in running, however, is yet to be validated for walking. METHOD: Qualisys motion capture, AMTI force plates, and Delsys Trigno accelerometers were used as gold standard lab measures for comparison against the RunScribe IMU. Twenty participants completed 10 footsteps per foot (20 total) measured by both systems simultaneously. Variables for validation included: Vertical Ground reaction force (GRF), instantaneous GRF rate, pronation excursion, pronation velocity, total shock, impact force, braking force. Interclass correlation (ICC) was used to determine agreement between the measurement systems, mean differences were used to evaluate group level accuracy. RESULTS: ICC results showed moderate agreement between measurement systems when both limbs were averaged. The greatest agreement was seen for GRF rate, pronation excursion, and pronation velocity (ICC = 0.627, 0.616, 0.539), low agreement was seen for GRF, total shock, impact shock, braking shock (ICC = 0.269, 0.351, 0.244, 0.180). However mean differences show the greatest level of accuracy for GRF, GRF rate, and impact shock. DISCUSSION: Results show mixed agreement between the RunScribe and gold standard lab measures, and varied agreement across left and right limbs. Kinematic variables showed the greatest agreement, however GRF had the lowest relative mean difference for group results. The results show acceptable levels of agreement for most variables, however further work must be done to assess the repeatability and sensitivity of the RunScribe to be applied within areas such as footwear testing and gait retraining protocols. Public Library of Science 2022-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9394823/ /pubmed/35994458 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273308 Text en © 2022 Lewin et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lewin, Max
Price, Carina
Nester, Christopher
Validation of the RunScribe inertial measurement unit for walking gait measurement
title Validation of the RunScribe inertial measurement unit for walking gait measurement
title_full Validation of the RunScribe inertial measurement unit for walking gait measurement
title_fullStr Validation of the RunScribe inertial measurement unit for walking gait measurement
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the RunScribe inertial measurement unit for walking gait measurement
title_short Validation of the RunScribe inertial measurement unit for walking gait measurement
title_sort validation of the runscribe inertial measurement unit for walking gait measurement
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9394823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35994458
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273308
work_keys_str_mv AT lewinmax validationoftherunscribeinertialmeasurementunitforwalkinggaitmeasurement
AT pricecarina validationoftherunscribeinertialmeasurementunitforwalkinggaitmeasurement
AT nesterchristopher validationoftherunscribeinertialmeasurementunitforwalkinggaitmeasurement